The AppStore app itself is fine, but the install times can be aages. Over WiFi, can be an hour+. Now I'm assuming that the download & install can continue in background, as I'm generally doing other stuff on the phone once the download has kicked off.
The AppStore app itself is fine, but the install times can be aages. Over WiFi, can be an hour+. Now I'm assuming that the download & install can continue in background, as I'm generally doing other stuff on the phone once the download has kicked off.
When you press the home button the OS suspends the application and unloads it from memory so I can't see how one application can effect another?
There's one mighty unchuffed editorial in The Guardian about Apple's MobileMe service:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/31/apple.email?gusrc=rss&feed=technologyfull
There's one mighty unchuffed editorial in The Guardian about Apple's MobileMe service:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/31/apple.email?gusrc=rss&feed=technologyfull
My god that really is a truly terrible story of human suffering.There's one mighty unchuffed editorial in The Guardian about Apple's MobileMe service:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/31/apple.email?gusrc=rss&feed=technologyfull
Yeah, they really dropped the ball on this one.
Imagine the cheek of that "whiney" woman daring to complain that something she's forked out a lot of money for doesn't work as advertised and - worst of all - she's had the audacity to share her experiences online!Who...? Apple for not doing enough testing, or the Guardian, for paying for that travesty of a column...?
Imagine the cheek of that "whiney" woman daring to complain that something she's forked out a lot of money for doesn't work as advertised and - worst of all - she's had the audacity to share her experiences online!
I'd be happy to run my business off Gmail which is free.Running your business from a £60 a year mobile mail forwarder?
You described it as a "travesty." In what way was it a "comedy characterized by broad satire and improbable situations", exactly?I've got no problem with people complaining about a service they've paid for. However, I thought that the way the column was written was way below the Guardians usual standard.
Perhaps that's why it was under the "Comment Is Free" banner. Funnily enough, I can see readers agreeing with her comments on that page too, so I would have thought that other MobileMe users might find that useful.It was more of a blog winge than fact finding researched news article on public customer satisfaction.
I'd be happy to run my business off Gmail which is free.
You described it as a "travesty." In what way was it a "comedy characterized by broad satire and improbable situations", exactly?
Perhaps that's why it was under the "Comment Is Free" banner. Funnily enough, I can see readers agreeing with her comments on that page too, so I would have thought that other MobileMe users might find that useful.
My 2G phone has started doing this. It wasn't doing it before.
My theory is that something has fucked up and is using up RAM or processor time or something.
My solution was to try a factory reset. I've been syncing all my data to get ready to try it. Now my 3G is here i'm not going to bother.
Going to sync my 3G and see what happens when i try and download something then. If I get the same problem then its going to be a step by step of adding apps one at a time to see which one is the guilty party.
Palringo doesn't unload from memory.
Plus programs with push elements must still be active somehow.
Plus Safari goes straight back to the last page visited when loading again.
Home button is not a total wipe.
But she tried to find solutions from the very people who had taken her money and promised a service.It would be handy if she posted any solutions, stuff she tried, etc... If I was her I'd look at the Apple Discussions forum. Handy stuff there...
Sorry, that appears to have nothing to do with this whatsoever. Could you please explain its relevance?Remember the numpty off to find himself thanks to the Guardian and the job obtained with Daddies help...?
But she tried to find solutions from the very people who had taken her money and promised a service.
It's not her fault if Apple's service was shit and she has every right to complain, whether you like it or not. Why shouldn't she complain?
Sorry, that appears to have nothing to do with this whatsoever. Could you please explain its relevance?
My understanding is that the Native Apps can run in background (Safari clearly shows this) and that selected ones (e.g. email) do network stuff too. However non native apps cannot run in background, until Apple release the notification server thingy (I forget it's name) to allow push type stuff to be managed in a way that doesn't create a risk of resource overload.
Possible indeed that the app image remains in memory, but frozen - that's the model used in Android.
You've just completely contradicted yourself. A minute ago you were complaining about the fact that she didn't offer any 'solutions' or log onto Apple's support forums etc, but now you're saying it's the style of her complaint you don't like.See post # 1067 : "I've got no problem with people complaining about a service they've paid for. However, I thought that the way the column was written was way below the Guardians usual standard."
And that's a really piss weak argument.It was also in CiF section, and indicates ( IMO ) the general lack of quality in this section of the Guardian...
You've just completely contradicted yourself. A minute ago you were complaining about the fact that she didn't offer any 'solutions' or log onto Apple's support forums etc, but now you're saying it's the style of her complaint you don't like.
But here's a thought. Instead of attacking the messenger, why don't you think about discussing the issues?
I know they had a big messup with some email servers when transitioning to MobileMe, its been a nightmare, not exactly unusual to have such a launch go pearshaped, but deserving of reporting nonetheless.
I do wonder if part of it comes down to the premium costs of Apple. Does this make some purchasers of their stuff far more sensitive about their failings, requiring them to build walls of defense to preserve the brand they have invested in?