Vintage Paw
dead stare and computer glare
I thought Jobs was rather quiet on the hardware issue. I honestly think they'll be working on possible hardware modifications leading up to this 30th Sept bumper cut-off/reassessment date.
lol I think not. Sure it is a very easy and obvious response to Apples paintful spin about smartphones and poor reception in general, but its hardly some cunning bait left by Apple to ensnare others, its just a really crappy excuse for the mistakes they have made with the iphone 4 phone. These other companies only have something to lose by getting into this if it turns out the reception on their handsets sucks, but even then its Apples flaw that has all the media & public attention right now and just as other manufacturers were not treated to such attention in the media as Apple when things go well, they will probably get less scrutiny over flaws.
The nature of Apples brand, marketing and communication style has long lead to concern or bemusement over their, and especially Steve Jobs, ability to employ a reality distortion field. It usually serves them well but it does mean that they have inherent weaknesses when trying to deal with a situation like this, their instinct to deny engineering faults etc can backfire.
I'll be interested to see what happens going forwards. I expect them to still try to make the iphone 4 better via software or hardware changes, but if its a hardware change they might try to keep quiet about it and we may get another backlash from existing users at some point, dunno.
I thought Jobs was rather quiet on the hardware issue. I honestly think they'll be working on possible hardware modifications leading up to this 30th Sept bumper cut-off/reassessment date.
What would it look like better implemented?
I don't ask to be confrontational, I ask simply because I have no other experience of multitasking on a phone, so this MT in iOS4 is my only frame of reference (and seeing as though I know no different, it works fine for me).
Hilarious the way they spend $100 million on testing rooms then use what looks like a rubber band dropped by a postie to secure the phone.That reception testing room they showed was something else, never imagine things like that would look so futuristic, reminded me of Cerebo from the Xmen films.
What would it look like better implemented?
I don't ask to be confrontational, I ask simply because I have no other experience of multitasking on a phone, so this MT in iOS4 is my only frame of reference (and seeing as though I know no different, it works fine for me).
It would actually multi task, i.e several applications running at once rather than freezing them on the switch its an important distinction.
Android does it fine.
It would actually multi task, i.e several applications running at once rather than freezing them on the switch its an important distinction.
Android does it fine.
What benefits would that bring?
It would actually multi task, i.e several applications running at once rather than freezing them on the switch its an important distinction.
Android does it fine.
Loads. With the Palm I could have a music streaming website open and playing music, have several active IM windows open, take a call in the middle of a game and go straight back (or receive mail/text notification within the game and keep on playing), have websites open and updating, Twitter updates etc etc.
I would make running applications icons a different shape like round or star like with the cross to kill them off. Wave goodbye to the task bar.
The iPhone's multi tasking is seriously limited compared to the webOS:Isn't the point of iOS4's MT that you can do that too?
You show up your lack of knowledge in operating system design. NT is a purely event driven system. When a process has nothing to do the scheduler will never schedule it, not one of its instructions will get executed. If this situation persists it will get removed from memory, all that will be left is the process handle and its stack.
What Apple have done is make this process less transparent to the Application.
Unrestricted MT would leave the battery life open to destruction by 3rd party. I refer you to the problems MS had with NT4 over NT3.51. My last job had a 3.51 box and that ran for 11 years straight without the need to reboot. For performance reasons they moved the graphics card drivers into ring 0 of the OS in NT 4. This meant that dodgy graphics card drivers could crash the OS. Of course that is exactly what they did.
Who got the blame?
I would make running applications icons a different shape like round or star like with the cross to kill them off. Wave goodbye to the task bar.
The iPhone's multi tasking is seriously limited compared to the webOS:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/198688/iphone_multitasking_were_still_waiting.html
The iPhone's multi tasking is seriously limited compared to the webOS:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/198688/iphone_multitasking_were_still_waiting.html
Yes, if the process doesn't have anything to do it wont be scheduled, so what?
Its obviously not all doom and gloom to not restrict 3rd party developers so much, somehow amazingly through some feat that defies all logic and engineering principles other mobile operating systems manage to do it.
You are also putting the blame in the wrong place regarding your comparison (which is apples and oranges anyway), the issue is a poorly developed driver not the architecture its plugging into.
They don't want their iPhone image tarnished by third parties. Apple are a very image focused company.
It will MT as well as any other phone. Those OS are just using the standard scheduler approach which IMO is a bit lazy on a battery device. Android batteries are a bit on the short side or have huge batteries.
I am well impressed by the battery life of my iPhone 4. Three days light use and it finally got to the 20% screen.
Android's battery life, in fact most smartphone batteries are reasonably similar to performance (iphone 4 may have upped the game but that just means the next HTC generation will be at the same level).
The decision by Apple is essentially misplaced distrust in developers, we know not to have unnecessary processes running.
MS put all their trust into developer and got the shit kicked out of them for it. I can understand Apples reluctance. Developers are generally pretty shit when it comes down to it.
'Blue screen of death' is something that Microsoft got accused of causing from the advent of NT4 till the release of XP.Its a different eco system, comparisons with windows are outdated and don't appreciate the differences. Its also a bit dramatic to say Microsoft got the shit kicked out of them for it, whats the most dominant OS today?
No developer will do more than have a passing interest in battery life, they are much happier to leave it to Apple to sort out.
The company reported net income for the three months to 26 June of $3.25bn (£2.1bn), or $3.51 a share, up from $1.83bn for the quarter last year.
Analysts were expecting earnings of about $3.11 a share.
The news sent Apple shares up 3.4% in after-hours trading, and go some way to relieve investors' concerns about the quality of the iPhone 4.
Apple's revenues rose to $15.7bn, well ahead of analysts' forecasts of about $14.75bn