Jesus christ, I know you've got some unhealthy obsession and bugbear about Apple and their users, but do you have to write such uninformed, random bullshit. Why the hell are you stuck in 1985 and talking about VCRs for a start? Feel free to provide some stats to back this remarkable assertion up, or frankly grow up a little.
Strangely enough some people who buy Apple are ever bit, if not more, tech adept than yourself. They may even manage to sound a little more relevant and less obsessed.
As for your last line it's laughable - we have no idea of the iphone 4's long term reliability, nor does this issue affect functionality in the vast majority of users that I've talked to, both personally and at work. Leave the moralising guesswork and inaccuracies at the door for a change, please. You come across like a right flapjack
Just because I post something you don't agree with doesn't mean its bullshit. In fact maybe you can point out what I have posted that is bullshit (other than the VCR comment obviously).
I dont feel I have unhealthy obsession and bugbear about Apple, in fact going on the number of posts in this topic I'd say you have more of an unhealthy obsession than me
Have I touched a nerve?
Fair enough its a cheap dig but I've had enough. Maybe I went overboard with the VCR comment
As a software developer I think I have a reason to hate them. Have a look at there
draconian developer agreement.
Apple prohibits any kind of reverse engineering of the SDK or iPhone OS, including what the EFF claims are "the kinds of reverse engineering for interoperability that courts have recognized as a fair use under copyright law".
Then there's the edict that a dev cannot "disable, hack, or otherwise interfere with" not just the iPhone OS and SDK, but also "any services or other Apple software or technology". This means Apple has made efforts to prevent Apple devices from interoperating with a lot of open source software.
But wait, there's more. In the Agreement's "Limitation of Liability" section, Apple states that it can never be held liable for damages - other than those involving personal injury - that "exceed the amount of fifty dollars". In other words, if the App Store police decide to axe your app for any reason, all damages resulting from your loss of development, marketing, and other expenses can't amount to more than what the EFF calls "the cost of a nice dinner for one in Cupertino".
The runaway popularity of the iPhone and the promise of an equally game-changing iPad provide Apple with the muscle it needs to exert draconian control over developers. If you want to get aboard Apple's gravy train, you have no option other than to agree to the Agreement - and even if you follow Apple's directives to the letter, Apple may, in the words of the Agreement, "reject Your Application for distribution for any reason, even if Your Application meets the Documentation and Program Requirements".
This means I could spend 1000s of pounds and man hours developing an application only for them to reject my application without reason. And this is before we get to the design flaws that apple wont acknowledge.
The reasoning behind Apple's seeming arbitrariness and demonstrable capriciousness was explained over 30 years ago by comedienne Lily Tomlin when she lampooned "the Phone Company" with a mocking summary of their attitude to customer service: "We don't care. We don't have to."
and yes I'm sorry if I despise apple users for encouraging this behaviour by letting apple constantly shaft them.