I'm sure that's correct but in my mind 10 years is a pretty long haul. I'm not sure if we'd have stayed another 10 years or 20 years things would have been materially different.
If it had simply been a case of "one last push" we might have stuck it out a bit longer. But the military top brass knew it wasn't the case so there was nothing to be gained by staying.
The fight was, and would have remained, one of removing foreign armies from Afghan soil. Staying there would have just prolonged the conflict.
We could have saved ourselves a lot of grief if we'd have bothered to ask the Russians whether it's a good idea to invade Afghanistan.[/QUOTE
What it boils down to is this, western boots on the ground have to have the support of the people, propping up a (western supporting)unpopular regime is never going to work, seek out those who are moving in the right direction and give them support, even if their present behaviour leaves a lot to be desired, we can't impose western mores on people who's history and experiences are radically different from ours, aye we can rightly decry their treatment of women/minorities, to any right minded westerner it's unforgivable,but lets not forget we behaved in a similar manner not so long ago. I'm not in any way being patronising I'm just saying people at different times in their history have different values.
No doubt I will have me arse kicked for the generalisations I have made but while being tired and slightly pissed I have tried to be honest.
However targeted strikes against the IS can only be a good thing, they are a truly 21st century threat, without any excuse to supposed western attacks against The Islamic religion.