TopCat
Putin fanboy
Yeah that makes sense.I'd be more tempted by the ones the editor suggested, as they have a newer CPU in.
Yeah that makes sense.I'd be more tempted by the ones the editor suggested, as they have a newer CPU in.
It's not the slimmest thing in town, but it's great value at £369.
http://www.ebuyer.com/276388-toshiba-satellite-pro-c660-255-laptop-psc1me-00q00ken
*edit: synchronicity!
It would be worth your while looking at this customer satisfaction survey from 2011 from all the laptop manufacturers.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2384243,00.asp
Apple and Samsung come out tops. Oddly Alienware do as well but I think that is because people don't like to admit they've just paid several thousand pounds for a Dell with a different badge.
If I were you Topcat, I'd go into a shop and look at laptops. You can't really judge online, some of the latest brands of laptops feel so badly made. They're all plasticy and flimsy, you think they were made by Canon.
I do want small and robust and the key board has to be excellent.
No optical drive mind you - not that they're used these days
It's says no optical drive at the top yet lists one in the specs (unless it comes with a usb external).I agree optical drives are going the way of the floppy.No optical drive mind you - not that they're used these days
Anyone got office 2010 they can give me?
Optical drive being a disk drive dvd thing yeah?
I have an external one to load stuff on. This is going to be used a lot on the move for word processing and endless spreadsheets.
http://preyproject.com/My last laptop got killed in a flood and the two before stolen in burgalries. I will try to look after this better. Whats that mad tracking program?
Now I am fretting.Only thing I have against the E325 is that the AMD E-450 is a pretty damned weak processor compared to the Pentium in the other one. But it really depends on what you're doing with it, it can be perfectly adequate for most tasks. The regular laptop AMD chips are a nice tradeoff between graphics and CPU power, but those things are AMD's netbook processors.
Don't fret. It's quite a lot faster than an Atom. Plenty fast for standard Office and web stuff. It's just that AMD's full-size laptop chips are a bit power thirsty and they're not appropriate for a 13" portable. You should get better battery life than the Pentium equipped one, and my Mrs. (who has the E320) gets 6 hours easily.Now I am fretting.