Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Actions against the policing bill

I'm 68. I have had two lots of back surgery, and one of neck surgery.

Not really in a physical position to go rioting, even if I were inclined to do so, which I'm not.

I see absolutely nothing admirable about those who rioted last night. I hope they are apprehended and punished.
I'd kind of agree to the point that there is "nothing admirable" about the rioting. Rioting isn't admirable in and of itself. But it is an inevitable consequence of people being a) pissed off with what's going on, and b) unable to make any change another way. Both of them true, evidently, in what happened in Bristol.

Rioting - all disorder - is a social phenomenon. It's what happens when sufficient people find themselves tackling a) and b) above. And there really isn't any point inveighing against "lawlessness", etc., because the more you stamp down on it - as has happened fairly relentlessly over the last 20 years - the bigger the bang is that comes when even MORE people find themselves angry and powerless.
 
I've never understood the obsession people have with this :confused: Years ago, I was in a relationship with someone who had held the rank of lieutenant in the Red Army, and she made a big deal of how many seconds it took her to strip down and reassemble an AK47. I can't remember how many seconds, it all sounded too daft for me.

Any road, this would maybe be more useful :D


I don't think it counts unless she was blindfolded 🤷‍♀️.
 
I see the centrist vermin are demanding the revisionist Starmerite clique purge comrade Whittome for being too anti-filth or some shit.
 
Was vaguely wondering: how do people reckon the existing anti-lockdown crowd will react to anti-policing bill stuff? Are there people in there who'll see it as an opportunity to fight back against... whatever it is that they think they're fighting back against, or will they tend to write the whole thing off as being Soros crisis actors or whatever?
 
The chances of there being a third force introduced is zero because all the top cops would unite against losing their toys: and it would threaten to remove the figleaf of cops actually being there to deal with crime.
The Tri-Force Agreement fell apart because Wiltshire and Glos wouldn't cede control to the A&S Chief Const on firearms ops, so it's somewhat implausible they'd let non-blueline outsiders go full GAL on their turf
 
Back
Top Bottom