Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Accused rapist Ched Evans to be released from prison

Yes, actually. When this case started there had just been a similar one locally where a bloke had 'picked up' an incredibly drunk girl after a night out, followed her and.....she didn't remember, because she was utterly pissed. But they eventually pieced together enough information, and got him to tell a bunch of what became obvious lies, so that he got sent down for rape. It's a sadly all too common way that certain scumbags commit rape, because they know they've got such a bloody good chance of getting away with it.
ok. Didn't know that. That's good, the local police deserve more respect given that. Retracted.
 
So you think it's a coincidence that in this particular case it was a famous millionaire footballer involved; The police and CPS would have shown the same intense interest in forensically reconstructing her night that she had no memory of had it turned out to have been just some bloke/s.

Similarly, you have to wonder whether he'd have been acquitted if he was Joe Public/light on funds.
 
I might not agree with you but think I get where you're coming from, that their behaviour was so morally reprehensable that in your opinion the police were right to start an investigation along those lines.

They would have been right to start an investigation if they had reasonabe grounds to suspect that a crime had been commited. We don't know the police's rationale, and the factors they took into consideration. But the fact that there were ultimately grounds to charge, and to avoid any sucessful submission of no case to answer at the end of the prosecution case (twice), would seem to vindicate their decision.
 
When Evans is around.
There are thousands of Evanses everywhere, opportunists who see women as things to be used, and there are also thousands of young women on any given Saturday night out drunk / high. As I see it the question at the heart of this case is where is the line where we all can agree that a crime has been committed when these two meet.
If she had made an accusation I would not be here at all and the case would probably have proceeded differently, but she didn't. Which is what makes X a sort of blank slate / test case for all of our prejudices.
 
Last edited:
With regarsds to why the witness came forward later, i belive that the sexual dominance of the alleged victim with the witnesss a short time after the alleged rape was so out of character with somebody who had just been raped that he felt compelled to come forward. This is indeed judgmental but bares no baring on the facts.

Except that what constitutes "out of character" during or soon after a traumatic event, is incredibly hard to determine. What is common to trauma is peri-and post-traumatic dissociation or similar behaviour-warping psychological protections.

As for what you believe, your beliefs are irrelevant. In your own words they have "no baring [sic] on the facts".
 
Don't be so quick to let them off the hook. Ask yourself first what the population of Rhyl is?
Some 25,000 souls apparently. What's your point? That the police were onto a juicy headline winning case instead of the usual drudgery ? That's what I thought too, but willing to stand corrected as per the belboid
 
There are thousands of Evanses everywhere, opportunists who see women as things to be used, and there are also thousands of young women on any given Saturday night out drunk / high. As I see it the question at the heart of this case is where is the line where we all can agree that a crime has been committed when these two meet.
If she had made an accusation I would not be here at all and the case would probably have proceeded differently, but she didn't, which is what makes X a sort of blank slate / test case for all of our prejudices.

It also means those thousands of young men now know they need just get a woman so drunk that she can't remember whether or not she consented, and find someone else willing to say they've had sex with her (and bung in some salacious details), and they're home and dry.
 
It also means those thousands of young men now know they need just get a woman so drunk that she can't remember whether or not she consented, and find someone else willing to say they've had sex with her (and bung in some salacious details), and they're home and dry.
I totally agree with you that this high profile failed case brought by the state has been a disaster in every way for x and for women in general.
His being found guilty and then being cleared are both pretty much incidental to the damage done.
 
Last edited:
Some 25,000 souls apparently. What's your point? That the police were onto a juicy headline winning case instead of the usual drudgery ? That's what I thought too, but willing to stand corrected as per the belboid

My point is she phoned police to report a missing handbag. It was they who persuaded her down the criminal route. They did so in the full knowledge her identity would have been in the public domain within weeks or days. But they had targets to meet. Alternatively they thought it was about time a couple of big time Charley's were brought down a peg or two. Not forgetting either that careers might be enhanced by a high profile collar. Whatever the combination of (win,win,win) factors involved their concern for her welfare can be put at about zero. Collateral damage.
 
My point is she phoned police to report a missing handbag. It was they who persuaded her down the criminal route. They did so in the full knowledge her identity would have been in the public domain within weeks or days. But they had targets to meet. Alternatively they thought it was about time a couple of big time Charley's were brought down a peg or two. Not forgetting either that careers might be enhanced by a high profile collar. Whatever the combination of (win,win,win) factors involved their concern for her welfare can be put at about zero. Collateral damage.
Add to that, she didn't want the case brought.
 
My point is she phoned police to report a missing handbag. It was they who persuaded her down the criminal route. They did so in the full knowledge her identity would have been in the public domain within weeks or days. But they had targets to meet. Alternatively they thought it was about time a couple of big time Charley's were brought down a peg or two. Not forgetting either that careers might be enhanced by a high profile collar. Whatever the combination of (win,win,win) factors involved their concern for her welfare can be put at about zero. Collateral damage.
My instinct is to agree with you on this, it is hard to believe they had her interests at heart, but for Belboid's post above, which does suggest that the police there in Rhyl is seriously interested in this sort of thing and willing to put time into it even when no footballers are involved.

Does anyone know where her handbag was - did it turn up?
Just occurred to me that was she missing her phone when she woke up? If she hadn't been missing her handbag she might have phoned a friend instead of going to the police station.
 
Last edited:
... But they had targets to meet. Alternatively they thought it was about time a couple of big time Charley's were brought down a peg or two. Not forgetting either that careers might be enhanced by a high profile collar. ...

Pure speculation. They might just as easily chosen to pursue it becasue they had a stack of itelligence reports to suggest that Evans and McDonald regularly raped women. You don't know one way or the other. But you choose to belive one interpretation, without any evidence, becasue it suits your agenda. Transparent.
 
My point is she phoned police to report a missing handbag. It was they who persuaded her down the criminal route. They did so in the full knowledge her identity would have been in the public domain within weeks or days. But they had targets to meet. Alternatively they thought it was about time a couple of big time Charley's were brought down a peg or two. Not forgetting either that careers might be enhanced by a high profile collar. Whatever the combination of (win,win,win) factors involved their concern for her welfare can be put at about zero. Collateral damage.
Tbh I'd have thought it a bit of a gamble if they believed careers might be enhanced as an embarrassing failure could ruin said careers.
 
You don't know one way or the other. But you choose to belive one interpretation, without any evidence, becasue it suits your agenda. Transparent.
As do you Athos. Or are you just right, morally right, no speculation and no agenda involved.
 
As do you Athos. Or are you just right, morally right, no speculation and no agenda involved.

No I don't; I've said that I don't know the police's rationale for pursuing the case. I've not chosen to believe one of a number of possible explnations which best suits my agenda.

Nothing in the arguments I've advanced is predicated on speculation; the only times I've advanced speculation is to demonstrate that two could play that game - at no time have I relied upon it.
 
It also means those thousands of young men now know they need just get a woman so drunk that she can't remember whether or not she consented, and find someone else willing to say they've had sex with her (and bung in some salacious details), and they're home and dry.

Do you really believe men look at this case I think 'blimey, that's how I get away with rape'?
 
You have a lot to say how a court works clearly without ever having been in one.
I've been in lots of courts: mags - Haringey, Highbury, Barnet, Horseferry Rd, clerkenwell, Neasden; crown - blackfriars, Southwark, Snaresbrook, Harrow, Wallington; courts of justice. I think I've a reasonable notion how a court works.
 
Back
Top Bottom