Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

A Woman's Place is Speaking Up in Wales

I can rephrase. Are there any speakers representing feminist women like me, who support self identification? I.e. The other side of the debate.
It's a public meeting and the organisers have explicitly encouraged people from all constituencies (and none) to come along. My instinct is to support self-identification but that's currently from a position of almost total ignorance so I'm attending in order to better understand the issue and the emotions aroused. I agree that it would be really helpful to have speakers who support self-identification and am disappointed that they are not on the platform. I will contact the organisers to ask if that can be put right. But I wish members would not go so quickly in to attack mode - it's a rubbish way of encouraging contributions.
 
It's a public meeting and the organisers have explicitly encouraged people from all constituencies (and none) to come along. My instinct is to support self-identification but that's currently from a position of almost total ignorance so I'm attending in order to better understand the issue and the emotions aroused. I agree that it would be really helpful to have speakers who support self-identification and am disappointed that they are not on the platform. I will contact the organisers to ask if that can be put right. But I wish members would not go so quickly in to attack mode - it's a rubbish way of encouraging contributions.

The Woman's Place UK Five Demands:

1. Respectful and evidence based discussion about the impact of the proposed changes to the Gender Recognition Act to be allowed to take place and for women’s voices to be heard;

Who gets to determine who has a woman's voice?
 
As usual, the men have arrived to tell women that we're wrong.
I'm a woman

But this is what usually happens when a trans woman - or even cis women at times - when we speak up against TERF ideology. We get accused of mansplaining or talking over women. It really isn't helpful if you genuinely want a debate.
 
Last edited:
Actually, I don't agree with the question, tbh. I don't believe that we're exclusionary in the first place. Women and girls have protected rights to female-only spaces for reasons of privacy and safety. Not wanting male-bodied people and trans women in those spaces is just upholding those rights. Male-bodied people, whether they identify as women or not, haven't been allowed into these spaces since the rights were established. Why would be change that based on the feelings of a tiny minority of people. It doesn't make sense, imo.
That's exclusionary. You've essentially decided that the other side of the argument has no validity and aren't letting us speak.

You've also decided that trans women have always been excluded which is really not true. I personally know a trans woman who works in a women's refugee. Have a Google, and you'll see that trans women have been accepted as women for a long time now.

You do realise that most cis women don't agree with your position.
 
That's exclusionary. You've essentially decided that the other side of the argument has no validity and aren't letting us speak.

You've also decided that trans women have always been excluded which is really not true. I personally know a trans woman who works in a women's refugee. Have a Google, and you'll see that trans women have been accepted as women for a long time now.

You do realise that most cis women don't agree with your position.
That's blue touch paper lit...

The cat among the pigeons so to speak
 
I won’t even pretend to understand the subject, but it seems to me from reading various comments recently that this is a fucking mindfield. You have people standing up for women’s rights, and for the rights of people identifying as women, be them pre/post operative or for any other reason. Thenyiu have womenstating that only biological women are teal worn and they feel threatened by allowing any other type of non- biological woman rights to use female toilets etc.

Is there a way that there will ever be common ground?
 
I won’t even pretend to understand the subject, but it seems to me from reading various comments recently that this is a fucking mindfield. You have people standing up for women’s rights, and for the rights of people identifying as women, be them pre/post operative or for any other reason. Thenyiu have womenstating that only biological women are teal worn and they feel threatened by allowing any other type of non- biological woman rights to use female toilets etc.

Is there a way that there will ever be common ground?
Yeh stand back lest you become embroiled in this clusterfuck
 
I won’t even pretend to understand the subject, but it seems to me from reading various comments recently that this is a fucking mindfield. You have people standing up for women’s rights, and for the rights of people identifying as women, be them pre/post operative or for any other reason. Thenyiu have womenstating that only biological women are teal worn and they feel threatened by allowing any other type of non- biological woman rights to use female toilets etc.

Is there a way that there will ever be common ground?
Most women, trans or cis, have had this worked out for years with no problem. Even self id has been a thing for years now. I have a female passport, I enter women only spaces, no-one cares except for a few extremists.

The women in my union have had to make a statement of support for trans women after a male official took it upon himself to speak for women in attacking trans women. Cis women have that backs of trans women, with the exception of a small number.
 
Yeh. Nit-picking. It's always accusations of nit-picking or pedantry people fall back on when they're caught out. And why not? No one *wants* to be thought a bigot after all. But here you are, insisting that you're not an anti-trans bigot when you're convicted of such out of your own mouth. Of course it's that pesky nit-picking to point it out.

Nope. Sorry, but don't and won't accept the accusation of bigotry for wanting to defend women and girls' safe spaces from male-bodied people, some of whom, possibly a teeny weeny minority, might self-id as a women in order to access them. Laws exist, in part, to protect people against harmful behaviours.
 
Here in Cardiff we already have a problem with inappropriate behaviour in the Village swimming mixed changing facitilites:

BBC NEWS | Wales | Concern over pool sex complaints

We know that predatory men go to extraordinary lengths to access their girls and women (boys/men too, of course), gaining employment in child-related work-places, befriending families in order to be close to children, targeting vulnerable women for abusive relationships, and so on.

Who is to say that some predatory men will not use self-ID to access women and girls? That's what we're opposed to. We aren't and never have been, anti-trans people. Never. Those of us who go back to the 70s and 80s in our fight for equality, and who achieved much for later generations, have always shown solidarity to trans ppl. The accusations of transphobia are tedious and tiring.
really confused by this
obviously the bloke was a dirty pervert man no question and there are many others, so imagine there'd be a more recent example
did they claim they were a woman? :confused: why did you post this as an example shygirl ?
 
I can rephrase. Are there any speakers representing feminist women like me, who support self identification? I.e. The other side of the debate.

There's nothing more we would like than to have rational, mature, respectful discussions. Alas, it seems a signicant number of trans activists believe there is no debate, that we should be shouted down, and have no right to a platform. I don't know if any of you saw those fucking disgraceful TRAs recently shouting down a trade unionist who stood on a picket line recently, because she had attended one of the Woman's Place UK meetings? Well, that's the kind of thing anyone, but mainly women, are faced with for attempting to debate.

Female trade union official ‘bullied off own union’s picket line on International Women’s Day’

(I believe she was on the picket line in solidarity with comrades from another union).
 
As usual, the men have arrived to tell women that we're wrong.
I don't care if it's a man, a woman, black or white is spouting bigotry I'll call that shit out.
I feel for trans people because they get it in the neck from both sexes.

You remind me of South Africa complaining about outsiders poking their nose into their affairs because they believed in Apartheid.
 
There's nothing more we would like than to have rational, mature, respectful discussions. Alas, it seems a signicant number of trans activists believe there is no debate, that we should be shouted down, and have no right to a platform. I don't know if any of you saw those fucking disgraceful TRAs recently shouting down a trade unionist who stood on a picket line recently, because she had attended one of the Woman's Place UK meetings? Well, that's the kind of thing anyone, but mainly women, are faced with for attempting to debate.

Female trade union official ‘bullied off own union’s picket line on International Women’s Day’

(I believe she was on the picket line in solidarity with comrades from another union).
how can you have "rational, mature, respectful discussions" if you're policing the attendees in advance?
 
really confused by this
obviously the bloke was a dirty pervert man no question and there are many others, so imagine there'd be a more recent example
did they claim they were a woman? :confused: why did you post this as an example shygirl ?

To show that predatory men, whether trans or not, will use loop-holes to gain access to women and girls. I am NOT saying that transwomen have this as an agenda, but that some men are likely to use self-id as a way of accessing women and girls. In the same way that some men pretend to be interested in youth work, teaching, etc in order to get their rocks off on being close to children. Think boy scouts. This shit happens.

We will not be able to distinguish between a man who is fraudulent in claiming to feel like a woman and someone who genuinely feels themselves to be a woman. The law is there to protect us and given that 98 % of sexual violence on women and girls is committed by men, we need to be cautious. There's rather a lot of instances in the US where trans-women (mostly are probably fraudulent in the way I described above) have spied on, assaulted, raped and murdered women and girls. The law is a safety-net. I hope that explains it for you Ddraig.
 
Nope. Sorry, but don't and won't accept the accusation of bigotry for wanting to defend women and girls' safe spaces from male-bodied people, some of whom, possibly a teeny weeny minority, might self-id as a women in order to access them. Laws exist, in part, to protect people against harmful behaviours.
It's a thing that has never happened even though, practically, self id had been around for a long time already - I self id as a woman, I'm not sure what the alternative is - and trans women accessing women only spaces happens now, and has been for a long time.

Abusive men dont need to ride trans women's coat tails to be abusive, they just do it.
 
Back
Top Bottom