Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

A tree grows from the windows on Electric Avenue, Brixton

I think you're being a little harsh. In fairness to Lambeth they are trying really quite hard to get Electric Ave sorted (I speak as someone who's had dealings with them on just that). The main problem is that the owners are either absent or don't give a shit.

It just seems to me that they don't punish wrongdoing but those who go to them are hit with unnecessary obstacles.

I used to live on Hillside Road in SW2. At the bottom of Cricklade Rd there's access to garages which includes a semi circular patch of grass behind a hedge. Nightly, people would come to let their dog shit, dump building and domestic waste, stop off for a piss. There was even criminals stashing stuff there. A neighbour offered to pay to cut the hedge to half height to give the bastards no cover and Lambeth refused, saying that it would be out of keeping with "the estate".

So while I am glad you can't paint these buildings pink and put manky windows in, it seems a bit like Nero playing the fiddle while Rome burns. A tree will undermine the structure of the building soon enough!
 
Not sure which is worse: the dilapidated buildings at one end of Electric Avenue or the hideous massive advertising billboard that's now gone up at the other end.

ad.jpg
 
Massive bill board wins. Yuck! Whilst digging around the history of murals, it seems people are quite good at complaining about (proposed or completed) murals but seem to not see billboards.

I heard that the developers got permission for it as part of their planning app on those buildings. I'm sure it will help their profit margin :mad:
 
Not sure which is worse: the dilapidated buildings at one end of Electric Avenue or the hideous massive advertising billboard that's now gone up at the other end.

View attachment 51704
It's hideous but I realise that there is a double standard when I look fondly at ghost signs on brick for Hovis bread or Bryant and May matches.
 
I quite like it (I think it's the colours :thumbs:), although I'll like it a lot more when the frontage is renovated and on show.
 
True. I still think it's an interesting double standard. I love the Oxo tower but if Mmmm Danone tried the same stunt today, I'd consider it an outrage.

It's as if time blunts naked commercialism.
Most people aren't even aware that the Oxo tower advertises Oxo and I think it has architectural merit.

I don't think anyone's going to have any trouble working out what this vast sheet of shiny plastic is advertising and, again, most of the older advertising wasn't for luxury goods.

*edit to add: that's not to say that there wasn't some awful advertising in the past, but it's rare to see stuff as big and as garish as this and for 'comparable' goods.
 
It's hideous but I realise that there is a double standard when I look fondly at ghost signs on brick for Hovis bread or Bryant and May matches.

Not really, as most of the painted-on advertising was for domestic staples with longevity (Eucryl Tooth Powder, Colemans' Mustard etc), not for non-essentials like iPhones. Part of the fondness comes from the products being something you can identify with, and probably, your parents' and grandparents' generations could identify with.
 
You might not like that sort of thing now, but perhaps in 100 years people will look back on the technological frivolousness of this era with nostalgia. I imagine there were plenty of Brixtonites bitching about the Bovril sign the day it went up
 
Not really, as most of the painted-on advertising was for domestic staples with longevity (Eucryl Tooth Powder, Colemans' Mustard etc), not for non-essentials like iPhones. Part of the fondness comes from the products being something you can identify with, and probably, your parents' and grandparents' generations could identify with.

I think there was more of a naivety to advertising back when those painted on bricks went up. Not like the cynical psychological hooks that ad men use now.
 
Not really, as most of the painted-on advertising was for domestic staples with longevity (Eucryl Tooth Powder, Colemans' Mustard etc), not for non-essentials like iPhones.
Some people might argue that for much of the new demographic of Brixton, iPhones are essential items :p
 
Some people might argue that for much of the new demographic of Brixton, iPhones are essential items :p
I have never owned an iphone, although I'm not sure if having a Windows Phone puts me in a morally superior position. If you want a smart phone, you have to dance with one devil or another.
 
You might not like that sort of thing now, but perhaps in 100 years people will look back on the technological frivolousness of this era with nostalgia.
I'm pretty sure that there wont be many people at all expressing any kind of opinion in 100 years time about the garish corporate advert that briefly covered an iconic Brixton building.
 
I don't literally mean that specific advert, but modern adverts of that type in general which everyone here seems to despise
 
I don't literally mean that specific advert, but modern adverts of that type in general which everyone here seems to despise
Where has anyone said that they despise all 'modern adverts of that type in general'? I don't have a strong opinion about billboards in general, but I have an opinion about them when they've turned an iconic building in the centre of town into a tacky advertising hoarding.
 
I think there was more of a naivety to advertising back when those painted on bricks went up. Not like the cynical psychological hooks that ad men use now.

I'd go along with that. While the Victorians were aware of the effect of, for example, putting a pretty female face in an ad, or the power in advertising food near food outlets, they weren't anywhere near as slick or as cynical as the advertising game is in the modern era.
 
Back
Top Bottom