Nasr Abu-Zayd and Mohammed Arkoun (not to mention Mahmoud Mohammed Taha) tried to develop a humanistic hermeneutics of the qu'ran and then applied this to islamic history. I (obviously) reject this approach as it remains attached to neoplatonism (without accounting for Ghazali's dissolution of the causal paradigm) which is the only real way to conceptualise a post-islamic worldview or apply rigorous dialectical analysis.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.