Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
Are all of these people being crushed by left turning HGV's?
It's not clear yet.Are all of these people being crushed by left turning HGV's?
Are all of these people being crushed by left turning HGV's?
Is it New Labour to reflexively blame HGV drivers and Lib Dem to blame car drivers?
Why not come out all the way and say that only Tories drive cars?
I did a real LOL to the body armour suggestion.Look at this shit article on the BBC website:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24998730
None of the solutions involve separating bikes and cars at junctions, or building infrastructure (apart from the slightly fantastical 'Build Elevated Cycling Routes').
One of the reasons media coverage of the cycling debate has got better is because many journalists are cyclists themselves (e.g. Peter Walker at the Guardian), or work with plenty of cyclists (Evening Standard.) But rubbish articles like this are still being penned by people who appear to know little about what cycling in London is like.
But yes, to your broader point, private cars are basically right wing.
Are bicycles left wing?
Know what I mean?
Laptop, you know better than most that 'common sense' can be a terrible guide. What evidence can you produce? What have you learned from this thread about the nature of the problem?
That's what's good about the KSC75s - separate ears ..If I listen to music whilst cycling I never use headphones, I only ever use the left earphone so I can still hear traffic (which is almost always is to my right).
I'll go so far as to say that it is a Tory attitude to reflexively blame cyclist behaviour for cyclist deaths on the roads. It is similar to the attitude that sees the unemployed blamed for their joblessness, and other attitudes such as those that place blame for crime levels at the door of single mothers.
That is archetypally tory in its approach - ignore the collective responsibility and the potential for solutions at the collective societal level; don't look beyond individuals whenever looking at a problem or apportioning blame; deny responsibility. Oh, and simply ignore any evidence that contradicts your position.
Why not come out all the way and say that only Tories drive cars?
It is strange to see how the car has been overlooked as an agent of political change. We know that the breaking of the unions, the dismantling of the welfare state and the sale of council houses that Margaret Thatcher pioneered made us more individualistic. But the way in which the transition from individualism to the next phase of neoliberalism – libertarianism – was assisted by her transport policies has been largely ignored. She knew what she was doing. She spoke of “the great car-owning democracy”, and asserted that “a man who, beyond the age of 26, finds himself on a bus can count himself as a failure”(13). Her road-building programme was an exercise in both civil and social engineering. “Economics are the method”, she told us, “the object is to change the soul.”(14) The slowly shifting consciousness of the millions who spend much of their day sitting in traffic makes interventionist government ever harder. The difference between the age of Herbert Morrison and the age of Peter Mandelson can be, in part, accounted for by the motorcar.
I can see the sense in that, although it shouldn't be overstated - cars have brought a lot of people increased freedom. But yes, it reduces problems down to the level of the individual - millions of individuals who see their problems with their cars as theirs and theirs alone to solve.
and of course it makes people free every bank holiday to go where everyone else is going. it's not like the car gets you everywhere either, it only goes where there's a road.Perhaps it should be overstated - in the words of Raoul Vaneigem we have this little gem. He considered the car an 'alienating gadget' which 'enables us to get to work and consume, pollute, destroy the countryside, and save some empty time and kill ourselves'.
and of course it makes people free every bank holiday to go where everyone else is going. it's not like the car gets you everywhere either, it only goes where there's a road.
how many can you fit in there?I've got a big, inefficient, estate car outside. It is however useful for putting bikes in.
I can see the sense in that, although it shouldn't be overstated - cars have brought a lot of people increased freedom.
how many can you fit in there?
We wouldn't be having these arguments without the CS plan. It's a stepping stone to better cycle infrastructure. It a rough way of leading to a safer future. That's why TFL did it, not because it was ideal but it was fairly easy to do and didn't cost too much. It moved things forward and now look how mobilised people are !
INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM!! Not collectively mandated freedom!