ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
rachamim18 said:Yes, Panda and Nino have solved it. Bravo. Hahahahahah.....
Go take your thorazine. Sounds like you need it.
rachamim18 said:Yes, Panda and Nino have solved it. Bravo. Hahahahahah.....
rachamim18 said:Yes, Panda and Nino have solved it. Bravo. Hahahahahah.....
rachamim18 said:Methadone, not thorazine.
rachamim18 said:Panda: I take it then that you are totally unaware as to the science of opioid substitution therapy.
ViolentPanda said:I've lost 2 friends to respiratory/pulmonary complications from methadone "substitution therapy" in the last 20 years. For me it's enough to know that those of my friends who continued using smack are all still alive, as are those people I know who've been prescribed thorazine (prescribed in Britain as "largactyl").
So you "take" what you want. I believe the evidence I see before me, which tells me that a maintenance dose of heroin (whether "street" or prescribed) is "safer" than methadone.
rachamim18 said:Pandas: Since this thread is shot to hell anyway I will respond. of course have no idea what your friends died from,etc. However, I am certainly well versed in all aspects of both the protocol and the substance and can assure you that when taken under medical supervison, and barring any allergies, the only danger is from deliberate misuse. To suggest that any illicit substance could ever be safer than a government approved and supervised controlled substance is not only the epitome of ignorance but dangerous as well. Of course, if you would like to provide evidence wither via an iniated thread in the Drugs Forum or via p.m. I would love to discuss it with you. Of course this will be ignored but I felt it the adult thing to do since you at least feign an interest in the subject.
Nino, other than your typical jocking nonsense, was the above sweeping enough for you? Glad to help feed your obsession You must have a thing for blue eyes.
As I mentioned above, both had "respiratory/pulmonary complications" that resulted in death, not anaphylaxis, but good old-fashioned compromising of organ function.rachamim18 said:Pandas: Since this thread is shot to hell anyway I will respond. of course have no idea what your friends died from,etc.
I'm sure you're as much an expert in methadone use as you are in all subjects you hold forth on (how is it the IDF are relaxed enough to let a methadone user fulfil his reserve duty by the way?).However, I am certainly well versed in all aspects of both the protocol and the substance and can assure you that when taken under medical supervison, and barring any allergies, the only danger is from deliberate misuse.
I haven't suggested that it is safer, you schlemiel. I've stated that in my direct experience two friends have died directly from methadone use (medically supervised), while the 5 heroin users I know (all of whom have been either constant or "chaotic" users for the last 20+ years, are still alive.To suggest that any illicit substance could ever be safer than a government approved and supervised controlled substance is not only the epitome of ignorance but dangerous as well.
Yet you're such an adult that you didn't even read my post properly and made assumptions based on your own prejudices.Of course, if you would like to provide evidence wither via an iniated thread in the Drugs Forum or via p.m. I would love to discuss it with you. Of course this will be ignored but I felt it the adult thing to do since you at least feign an interest in the subject.
Originally Posted by ViolentPanda
I'm sure you're as much an expert in methadone use as you are in all subjects you hold forth on (how is it the IDF are relaxed enough to let a methadone user fulfil his reserve duty by the way?).
"The effects of methadone and its role in fatalities" Corkery, Schifano et al 2004 for example?. My two late friends' cases comprised part of the research dataset.rachamim18 said:Panda: No indication at all that methadone has ever caused anything of the sort in and of itself. Of course if you have some peer reviewed information to back up your subjective bias I would love to discuss it.
Why would it disturb me?Expert? Well, let's see...I hold forth on so much: Opiates and opioids, and Israel and the Mid-East. Yes, I see your point. Actually, aside from being on methadone for 13 years I was compelled to take chem and physiology in university so I am able to [slightly] add to my subjective experience with regards to methadone. Sorry if that disturbs you.
Ah, the arrogance again.As for my Reserve duty, it is no problem at all. In fact, Israel holds no bias as to the regimen. It is treated like a health problem. As long as I am certified fit for Regular Duty, I am good to go. I am on what is called "Medical Maintenance." I get 6 weeks worth of medication at a time, unlike many in America and elsewhere who are forced to go to a clinic everyday, etc. I am also Hep-C positive, and this also is not an impediment. IF I wanted, I could claim exemptions on both and be relased from Reserve altogether but since regulations were reformatted this year, making 40 the last mandatory year for Infantry, I am fine with it. Gee, who would have ever thought you cared? I am touched sweety. Actually, I am not suprised on your ignorance concerning the IDF seeing as it gels perfectly with most of your other "views." P.S.: I also served a prison sentence in Israel for narcotics, and it did not inerfere with my status, so that is how much you know about Israel and the culture there.
The research I cited at the start of this reply included poly-substance (illicit and prescribed) abuse factors as well as general health.Now, as to your claim of pulmonary and respiratory complications, you are referring only to faulty UK statistics. If you review that findings, you will see that no tox screens were included, nor were any personal case histories. As such, it ignores the unfortunate prevalence of poly-substance abuse among methadone clients. As with any powerful depressant, when taken in conjunction with other controlled substances, both licit and illicit, methadone is extremely volatile.
The qualification was that I would not offer my experience as prescriptive for somebody's treatment. Therefore there is no "danger".Yes, you DID say [in another manner] that it was subjective experience when offering that maintanence doses of heroin [licit and illicit] were safer than methadone. However, you said it...That is the bottom line. I do not see the qualification as relevant. The statement is what it is, and it is most definitely reckless as well as incorrect.
Age does not denote maturity, neither does knowledge. Maturity is attitude and outlook.As to the maturity card, read the preceeding again wise elder.
To partially quote William Shakespeare, "...all sound and fury, signifying nothing...".Now I have low credibility among Drug Forum users? Who cares? I have posted there twice since August I think. Drug Forum regulars belittle my grasp of methadone? Oooohhh, that smarts! Even if I had any idea what you are on about. You are something else. There are alot like you though, fighting anything that moves. More power to you, that armchair must get stale after a while.
No, you mentioned A "faulty paper".rachamim18 said:Panda: notice that I already mentioned that faulty paper.
Really, whom by (by which I mean peers, not soi-disant "experts".Provideone with relevant i.e. tox screens, etc] and you have a good case. Your paper has been laughed at since it was issued [of course no offense to your late friends].
You do that, bub. Knock yourself out.Later on you claim thatin fact that poaper does take the circumstances I listed into account. Could I be mistaken then? I will reexaminethe paper after I finish on Urban today.
Bullshit. If that were the case we'd have a vastly higher rate of mortality worldwide from heroin use than we do."Is everybody an idiot who would follow your subjective reckoning?" I am sure some would. Most addcits/heavy users are vulnerable and grasping for straws. If someone offers them reinforcement they will latch on, that is just common sense.
It's got nothing to do with people passing themselves off as heroin addicts (something I'm sure only an idiot or someone with psychological damage would do), and everything to do with your having made statements that had little credibility."Maturity." We can agreeon something apparently.
"My grasp of reality..." Yes, because so many people seek to pass themselves off as heroin addcits these days... Got it.
Do you always write in such fluent cliché?"Threatened by me?" Proof is in the pudding if it really mattered to me.
America won't have any choice but to reverse their legislation if they want to meet their enlistment quotas."British Armed Forces..." Yes, American as well although I suspect that they will coem off of their high horses rather soon, as is Canada as we speak. Volunteer Armies are cute. America actually will not allow enlistment for many misdemeanours. Israel is quite different. My Division, NAHAL, has a social component. Many Nachlawi work in community service program for up to a third of their enlistment. Some of these programs work with offenders and addicts. In fact, NAHAL also has [suprise] exoffenders and addicts among its personel. Ironically though, it is the other two battalions that are involved in that, not mine.
I'm mildly appalled to note that nowhere in this entire post did you manage to mention Palestine or the Palestinians.rachamim18 said:Descartes: At last someone is trying to steer the thread back to its intended path...albeit with antagonism. Israel, and the IDF by extension are of course filled with human beings.
[yadayadayada]
If you are able to remove most of your emotional response from your examination of the issue, you might start to agree.