and since noone ever talks about Arab-Israelis on this board [other than to show them as victims of Jewish Israelis] it is just another "Subhuman Jew thread" dressed up a bit
If you need low-cost labour you don't compromise your own security by employing criminals, idiots or other liabilities.astronaut said:They use a combination of conscripts who are unfit/surplus for combat duty, NCOs who are basically unfit/surplus conscripts who sign on for keva (permenant army), and external laborers who are locals and probably vetted.
If you need low cost labor, who do you hire?
he could hardly say otherwise, unless he wanted people to tap the sides of their heads as he passed and mutter "meshugeneh".Even Herzl admitted that a Jewish state would entail Jewish criminals.
You would say that, wouldn't you?Yes to being a snob, no to having an agenda.
Yisrael Beiteinu Chairman Avigdor Lieberman on Thursday lashed out at Israeli Arab political parties and said he hoped Arab Knesset members who had contact with Hamas or did not celebrate Independence Day would be executed.
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/712521.html
Moono: Where is home Moono?
moono said:Oh my god, cue a white robed and bearded plonker with a redundant animal husbandry implement. Baaaaaaaah.
rachamim18 said:Moono: Yes, NCO Taysir was discussed but his name and ethnicity were not brought up until way into the thread . The purpose of the thread was to disparage the IDF and Israel yet again. When Taysir's etnicity came to light [I belive from me] , then it took interesting turns. Par for the course.
It seems to be a case of statutory rape, not a gang rape -- there is a big difference.
Mm?astronaut said:What is the relevance of this, apart from attempting to dehumanize the Israelis?
It isn't "nonsense" at all, it's observance of the law. In the US you have plentiful paths of changing laws if the majority believe they are in error. The fact that the laws relating to minimum age of sexual consent still stand shows that many don't share your view of a "nonsense".rachamim18 said:Nino: Actually, statuatory rape is applied with little thought to actual rape. Yes, rape IS a crime of power.However, charing an 18 year old boy with stauatry rape for consensual sex with a 15 year old [as happens in some parts of America] is nonsense. The only abuse of power there is by the state.
rachamim18 said:Panda:Usual jocking.
Nino: Actually, statuatory rape is applied with little thought to actual rape. Yes, rape IS a crime of power.However, charing an 18 year old boy with stauatry rape for consensual sex with a 15 year old [as happens in some parts of America] is nonsense. The only abuse of power there is by the state.
In Israel , depending on your socio-economic status, girls are considered women at 12. School is only mandatory through 5th grade so you need to take off those cultural blinders.
This case, as I said earlier IS a crime. Uniforms are more highly respected in Israel than in most other nations. As such, these men should be prosecuted to the mx.
nino_savatte said:You're apologising for rape here. You make a distinction in order to claim that what these troops were doing was legitimate. It's digusting. You have no shame or honour.
cemertyone said:Yeah even when IDF troops are involved in raping a young child.....he still feels the need to defend them....what a cunt!!!
rachamim18 said:Panda: Laws can be better tailored, certainly in that case but I fear that is far off track here.
Nino: More jocking.
Cemerty: Actually I did the opposite, unless calling for the maximum prosecution is defending them. Just shows that you fail to read even these short posts. Not suprising at all.
nino_savatte said:What is "jocking"?
ViolentPanda said:It appears that Rachamim believes he has taken control of these boards and is putting in place a police of "no joking", no divergence (unless it's his) from the subject named in the thread title, and no sarcasm (again, unless it's his).
Meanwhile, we're still in essence none the wiser as to his views n the rape of this girl, seeing as he's obfuscated and equivocated.
rachamim18 said:Nino: OFF TOPIC, but I will play the game here. YES, I DENY that I made excuses for any rapists or rape.
Panda:OFF TOPIC, but the same. "Jocking" is American slang. It means, "dick riding." I do believe it was already explained to nino. either way, I do kno0w how to spell "joking."
So not only are YOU straying off topic (shame on you), but you're accusing me of riding dicks?rachamim18 said:Panda:OFF TOPIC, but the same. "Jocking" is American slang. It means, "dick riding."
Really? It's hard to tell when you've just misspelt "know".I do believe it was already explained to nino. either way, I do kno0w how to spell "joking."
rachamim18 said:Nino: A "grunt" is a term normally associated with Infantry not kp and supply workers
As has already been made clear to you by others, there is a distinction to be made for stuatory rape and rape itself. I will not repeat their words here as you seemed to have at least loosely grasped it in the other thread
Panda: At least you are consistent.
nino_savatte said:No, "grunt" is used to describe any common or garden soldat.
ViolentPanda said:Jah, but Rachamim, in his usual way, appears to be extrapolating his US and Israel-centric experience into a paradigm that covers the whole world.
Of course, in many nation-states' militaries the term "grunt" is actually slang for private soldiers.
There are, of course, militaries that don't use the term at all. They're usually the ones that rely on skill rather then weight of numbers to "get the job done", and whose soldiers have a bit more self-respect.
IMHO it seems to be more in favour among those militaries that are "Americanised" (usually due to all those "military instructors" the US is happy to provide at a price).