Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

“Rings of Power” - "Lord of the Rings" television adaptation

Ta people I may try to find some stuff to download. I particularly like old b/w fillums like Margaret Rutherford Miss Marple and as MickiQ says they can take forever to download with only one person uploading. I quite liked the Hobbit so I may start with that.
 
I think it’s really really good. I didn’t like the films much, this seems better. It looks great and the story is interesting because i have no idea where it is going.

Better than the GoT prequel imo.
 
qBittorrent (which I use as well) is a tool that downloads torrents from whatever peers (other computers) it might find them on, Pirate Bay and RARBG (my current favourite) are simply websites that hold lists of torrents. Basically you download a torrent (essentially a control file) from the website and then qBitorrent reads that and uses the info in it to find the pieces of the actual file you want and downloads that to your PC. The stuff being stolen isn't on the website, it's scattered willy-nilly across the web indexed by a few key servers.
 
I use qBittorrent. What's the difference between that and private tracker?

It's a seperate thing. I also use qBittorrent which is the software you need to download torrents. A private tracker is a site you need to be a member of. On pirate bay there is no incentive not to hit and run, that is download the torrent and stop seeding. On a private tracker it's logged, so you need to keep seeding to stay in good standing. Ultimately it benefits everyone. I can give you an invite if you want.
 
Thought it a bit slow but better in the 2nd episode, trying to un- think the films imagery helps but is quite hard to do.
 
See!

It's vaguely annoying but they don;t quite get enough screen time to make it unwatchable.

None of you philistine Brits would notice anyway, ye all think we sound like Mrs Brown!* (Looking at you kebabking ) :D :mad::p

1662394273558.png



* I actually have little or no traces of my accent left. I sound like cross between a West Country wurzel and Danny Dyer.
 
Well this is bobbins so far. It has moved incredibly slowly in the first two episodes, and if you're the kind of person - and there seem to be many - who are sympathetic to the style of TV series that jumps between multiple characters while only moving the plot forward infinitesimally in each scene, and barely even moving it forward in a whole episode, then you will like this series more than me. Unfortunately I hate that style and can't wait for it to go out of fashion. I don't think it's even a good version of that style - like we kept going back to scenes with the Man Who Fell To Earth but learned pretty much nothing new each time. But also there's just no good characters. Even Galadriel, who I think is meant to be one of the main heroes, is whiny and petulant and not very likeable. And the aesthetics aren't as good as I expected given the money they spent on it - there's an unreal quality to a lot of the CGI that makes it a bit cartoonish, rather than immersing you in the world. I'll give it one more episode to see if they can come up with some non-glacial plot or good characters but I'm pessimistic at this point.
 
it's moving at quite a clip. In 2 episodes they've introduced a large number of characters and handled loads of plotpoints. The pacing is spot on if you ask me
 
I'm quite happy with the cutting about - I want it to last a long time,so I'm happy f each story progresses at a relatively slow rate..
 
The cutting about is nowhere near as annoying as Amazon's stab at Wheel of Time. That was dreadful.
 
if you're the kind of person - and there seem to be many - who are sympathetic to the style of TV series that jumps between multiple characters while only moving the plot forward infinitesimally in each scene, and barely even moving it forward in a whole episode, then you will like this series more than me.
Seems I was right!

There's nothing wrong with jumping between narrative threads, but something substantive has to happen in each scene so as to keep each thread engaging. Some hobbits offering some food to a mysterious man and him screaming at them in a way that bends the trees is not a substantive happening, it's just part of introducing the mysterious man. But wait, this is like, the fourth scene with him in, so why are we still just being introduced to him? We knew he had weird powers in scene 2 with him, so what did we learn here? Nothing. What's the next scene going to be? Him being a bit weird again. Fascinating!
 
Seems I was right!

There's nothing wrong with jumping between narrative threads, but something substantive has to happen in each scene so as to keep each thread engaging. Some hobbits offering some food to a mysterious man and him screaming at them in a way that bends the trees is not a substantive happening, it's just part of introducing the mysterious man. But wait, this is like, the fourth scene with him in, so why are we still just being introduced to him? We knew he had weird powers in scene 2 with him, so what did we learn here? Nothing. What's the next scene going to be? Him being a bit weird again. Fascinating!
You want him to whip out his staff first scene?!
 
Wheel of Time dialogue was appalling, especially the "jokes" which were epic cringe. Give me dwarf/elf bantz any day.
Oh yeah, the dialogue was clunky as hell, and most of the characterisation was really weak. It was only better in that one respect.

E2a I did kind of enjoy it though because I used to like the books and it was interesting to see the world depicted on screen.
 
Watched the first 3 now. Liked it so far more than i thought i would and will continue watching (for now). Can't really remember the films but as its a prequel i guess that doesn't matter. Did think the "snow troll" and "boar" animation was a bit dodgy for a billion dollar series.
 
Back
Top Bottom