Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Wristwatches, watches and watch-like gadgets

bi0boy said:
Yours was made here I reckon:

YouTube Video

Fossil do have a Swiss plant now in addition to their Chinese ones but are sure to brand the watches made there as Swiss.

Don't think Omega had a Chinese factory in 1953. :p
 
Most of these companies source their mechanisms from the same supplier.

It's all about the glossy adverts in the Economist and shit.

"You don't own one, you just look after it for the next generation" and all that shite.

You're all gullible marketing fodder.

Patek and Rolex make all their own movements, which proper watch nerds care about a great deal.

If you think you're immune to marketing, you're a bit naive.
 
Mine's a 1953 Omega 30mm, a bit like the one in the picture, except that the outer band on the face is black (and it's in cleaner condition). An amazing watch; not only beautiful, but also the most precise wristwatch calibre ever tested at Neuchâtel, Geneva and Kew Teddington. After 60 years, my wind up watch keeps time like no other. To my mind, it pisses all over most of the modern Omegas (and a lot of other high-end brands), which just look crass. (Not sure how much it cost, because it was a present.)

IMG_0084.jpg
Classy.
 
Old Omega manual wind dress watches are incredibly good value. You can get 9k and 18k gold ones for not much over scrap value. They're a fantastic choice if you want the traditional thin, leather strapped gold watch to go with a suit.
 
ExtraRefined said:
Old Omega manual wind dress watches are incredibly good value. You can get 9k and 18k gold ones for not much over scrap value. They're a fantastic choice if you want the traditional thin, leather strapped gold watch to go with a suit.

Mine is stainless steel. A better choice for everyday wear.
 
Ok those two a different, meh.

They both buy parts from Swatch though

Swatch reaches agreement over watch movements

Rolex and Patek don't use ETA movements, and a badly written and imprecise Reuters article won't prove otherwise.

They've both used bought in movements for chronographs in the past from Zenith and Lemania respectively IIRC, but neither do any longer. The Lemania based Pateks were heavily modified anyway, sometimes to the extent of adding on calendar functions.
 
Found not wearing a watch resulted in less problems with my tinnitus, how I don't know, but haven't worn one for years, not a miss really.
 
I didn't say they did, but tell me they don't use an Swatch parts. Nivarox springs for example? They're assemblers basically, and that can just as easily be done in China.

Maybe, clearly you know more about using google in a desperate attempt to argue a completely false position Swiss watches than me. That's akin to saying "BMW don't make cars, because their cars contain brakes made by Brembo" though.

You're welcome to buy a Chinese perpetual calendar if you want, although they cost about the same as the Swiss ones, and don't look half as nice.

http://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=10718394197&cm_cat=50005700
 
That's akin to saying "BMW don't make cars, because their cars contain brakes made by Brembo" though.

Are Brembo owned by e.g. Ford? And springs are a bit more to a watch than brake pads are to a car.

And did the German competition authority intervene in a supplier to BMW and Mercedes' because they had too much market control?
 
As far as I can tell Patek and Rolex do in fact make their own balance springs on current models.

I'm not much interested in what someone who doesn't wear a watch thinks they're worth. Clearly they're worth nothing to you. I don't make a habit of going onto car threads and telling people they're wasting their money.
 
bi0boy said:
Anyone who thinks they get what they pay for when it comes to watches is deluding themselves.

A lot of what you pay for with modern high-end watches is the name. But, as long as there's a market for that name, then you probably get what you pay for. If you spend £2,000 on a Rolex, it's likely to go in value over the same timescale as a £200 watch will depreciate. My beef with a lot of them is their ugliness and their ostentatiousness.
 
ExtraRefined What is the story with the rolex? Tried googling it and couldn't find anything. Interested to know.

The Military one? The MOD issued them from the 1960s-1980s roughly, to various outfits but mostly Navy divers, as they were the best tool for the job at the time; this of course being before they were toys for city boys. They're modified from normal Submariner 5513, having MOD issue numbers on the back, and different hands. When they were no longer issued, they were sold off at cost to their holders.

They're usually referred to as "Milsubs", there's more info here amongst other places.
 
i've got a fake submariner, looks like this,

sub1a.jpg


except the bezel is made of tinplate instead of ceramic, the magnifying bit isn't as good and the little luminous bobble fell off.

it has got a screw in crown and a very smooth movement, keeps good time and only cost me fifty quid.
 
413fsTmkXPL._SL500_AA300_.jpg


Ive had this one for a good few years. ms starfish bought me it one birthday or christmas. I really should get a new strap for it soon though.
 
Ok those two a different, meh.

They both buy parts from Swatch though

Swatch reaches agreement over watch movements

That article doesn't say what you seem to think it does. Swatch is the largest watch company in the world and has acquired many high end brands. That doesn't mean it makes them all. Rolex, Omega, Zenith etc., all have there own manufacturing plants and any externally sourced parts are made to their specifications. Watch enthusiasts are extremely selective about the provenance of their movements!
 
I'm flogging off some of my watches. As my girlfriend accurately points out, "they all look the same" anyway :)

I'm getting rid of this one soon. I like it but prefer the dazzling luminosity of my new one best!
citizen-watch-jr3060-59f-3.jpg
 
That article doesn't say what you seem to think it does. Swatch is the largest watch company in the world and has acquired many high end brands. That doesn't mean it makes them all. Rolex, Omega, Zenith etc., all have there own manufacturing plants and any externally sourced parts are made to their specifications. Watch enthusiasts are extremely selective about the provenance of their movements!

I just think watches are such a wankfest it makes me sick.

I mean look at these cunts

patek-philippe-advertising.jpg
 
I just think watches are such a wankfest it makes me sick.
What, all of them? :facepalm:

del.jpg
Back on to my (non wanky) watches, here's the others I'm going to flog soon. They're both tough as nails and have given good service for many years, but they're battery powered and I'm solar all the way now!
 
There are some dreadful adverts for expensive watches, apparently designed to sell them exclusively to the cunt market. Watches themselves are good though.

There are some dreadful ads for fountain pens as well, though not quite as bad as that, but that doesn't put me off them. Well actually I'm not sure I'd buy a Mont Blanc - not a modern one anyway, maybe a vintage.
 
is their a back story to your hatred of watches?

ok I got laughed at at school for having a watch that was only waterproof to 10 metres, whereas 25 was considered pathetic, 50 metres barely acceptable and 100+ required to be anywhere near cool.

But mostly it's because all the watch adverts I've seen are just about flogging over-engineered fluff to people who use private banking. I wonder what the average markup is. I'm all for having an accurate time piece if that's what you need, but don't kid me that it's worth paying silly prices for one.That can't be justified unless you succumb to marketing twaddle about extreme usage, sentimentality or what not.
 
There are some dreadful ads for fountain pens as well, though not quite as bad as that, but that doesn't put me off them. Well actually I'm not sure I'd buy a Mont Blanc - not a modern one anyway, maybe a vintage.

I bet most decent expensive fountain pens write far better than cheap ones.

Time is time though. As long as a watch is sufficiently accurate for your purposes, which let's face it for most people are not millisecond-critical, then why do you need to spend more money? How many people are actually going to need their Breitling to work properly in Antarctica or when they sky dive from space?
 
Back
Top Bottom