Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Work starts on the eagerly awaited new Foxtons office on Brixton Road

http://m.haart.co.uk/HRT011107771
Obviously property isn't booming as much as some people think. This house was on about a month ago with an open day and guide price of 740-780.
This sold for 1,195,000 in May.
Now back on the market for £2,000,000. That's a cool 65% rise - without any improvements carried out.
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-28439394.html
Surely the Effra Road property is in line with the Archbishop's place one price-wise?
Grand terrace with self contained one bedroom flat included - compared to a workman's cottage with "fantastically snug" reception and "Tardis-like upper floors" (quoting the estate agent here).
What would annoy me would be if it turned out that LB Lambeth or SLAM had sold the Effra Road property to a developer so they could make an almost instant 67% profit. I know there are/were some properties used for people "out on license" on that part of Effra Road. And SLAM/LB Lambeth have form on property deals which scarecly maxed their return - look at the Learning Difficulties team building (ex-1950s registry office) at 340 Brixton Road. Now part of the Lexadon empire.
 
Surely the Effra Road property is in line with the Archbishop's place one price-wise?
Grand terrace with self contained one bedroom flat included - compared to a workman's cottage with "fantastically snug" reception and "Tardis-like upper floors" (quoting the estate agent here).
What would annoy me would be if it turned out that LB Lambeth or SLAM had sold the Effra Road property to a developer so they could make an almost instant 67% profit. I know there are/were some properties used for people "out on license" on that part of Effra Road. And SLAM/LB Lambeth have form on property deals which scarecly maxed their return - look at the Learning Difficulties team building (ex-1950s registry office) at 340 Brixton Road. Now part of the Lexadon empire.
No - it was a Portuguese family. I remember Lambeth wanting to sell one like you describe on the corner of Mervan Road at auction - they would not allow viewings "in case of disturbing the occupants" who were about to be thrown out. You can imagine what effect that would have on the price.

I have no idea whether this is true but someone mentioned that Foxtons have a property fund and the Effra one made me wonder...
 
  • Like
Reactions: CH1
That's only because they have enough middle class, well-off parents who go to their church every Sunday to fill from their catchment area, which of course includes HH. But you can live next door and not be Catholic and a letter from no one will get you in.

Personally I don't live in catchment and I wouldn't send my child to a Catholic school but I know a lot of parents who live on that road who seethe at the thought that their children are not allowed in.

I overheard some parents recently talking about how to get there children into schools. One said he was going the the Catholic church so that his kid could get into the local Catholic school. They note how many times u attend. You had to attend for a good amount of time for it to count. He also said that doing things like baking cakes for school events got points as well.
 
I overheard some parents recently talking about how to get there children into schools. One said he was going the the Catholic church so that his kid could get into the local Catholic school. They note how many times u attend. You had to attend for a good amount of time for it to count. He also said that doing things like baking cakes for school events got points as well.

Of course. This is exactly how it works. And it is very wrong.

Corpus Christi, for example, manages by such means to keep its Free School Meal rate - a rough proxy for deprivation - down to 8 per cent.

Other Brixton Hill area primaries, which cannot select on the sly, generally have FSM rates of more than 50 per cent.

The classic trick at CChristi is helping run the playgroup. Together with arse-on-pew it just about guarantees a place for your child in a classroom free of vexing ruffians from those awful council estates.

Of course, families can also live inside catchment areas of non-faith schools for dubiously short periods: something I've undertaken.
 
Religious schools should be banned. School's for learning, not indoctrination, and it's hugely unhealthy to segregate children in this way. Kids should be able to learn about all religions (and atheism etc) and interact with each other.
schools have always been for indoctrination, whether secular or religious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: han
Religious schools should be banned. School's for learning, not indoctrination, and it's hugely unhealthy to segregate children in this way. Kids should be able to learn about all religions (and atheism etc) and interact with each other.

Don't ban them: just withdraw their state funding!

Faith schools are divisive and doctrinaire but it's much more significant that their admissions procedures lead to the exclusion of poorer kids.

Families and the schools collude in this because it improves results.
 
Called Trinity. No site chosen. But theoretically centred on Clapham Common clock tower

http://www.trinityacademylondon.org/

There is another school with Catholic ethos in between Streatham Hill and Clapham, http://www.thelaurelsschool.org.uk/

I think it will take the first kids next September.

£3,900 per child per term. £12 grand a year, give or take, before you've bought a uniform or gone on a school trip. 40% reduction for the third child though. £31k instead of £36k if you have three kids.
 
There is another school with Catholic ethos in between Streatham Hill and Clapham, http://www.thelaurelsschool.org.uk/

A new private school opening. That's rare surely?

I think it will take the first kids next September.

£3,900 per child per term. £12 grand a year, give or take, before you've bought a uniform or gone on a school trip. 40% reduction for the third child though. £31k instead of £36k if you have three kids.
 
I have to say though, there is no low I will not sink to if I think it is for the good of my daughter. If I were to get a bursary on the basis of not having enough money to send her to The Laurels, I probably would. Although I wouldn't want her to be in the position where she is the poorest kid and I can't afford to buy her what her peers get.
 
I have to say though, there is no low I will not sink to if I think it is for the good of my daughter. If I were to get a bursary on the basis of not having enough money to send her to The Laurels, I probably would. Although I wouldn't want her to be in the position where she is the poorest kid and I can't afford to buy her what her peers get.

I'd also do - and have done - just about anything. Except bow to Rome.

Ridiculously, recidivistically, I'd have no such problems with the Church of England.
 
I, however, must be a lesser parent. I can't be bothered to either move house or feign religion.
im amazed anyone can "pretend" go to church every week. even that bit about making a cake sounds like a hassle.

Faith schools are divisive and doctrinaire but it's much more significant that their admissions procedures lead to the exclusion of poorer kids.
.
i thought the whole thing is that its not about money, its about whether you go to the church or not? how do they exclude poorer kids?


my mind is boggled by those house prices posted above.... i want to type something but its too insane
 
Last edited:
i thought the whole thing is that its not about money, its about whether you go to the church or not? how do they exclude poorer kids?

They don't actively exclude poorer kids but, somehow, the pews, and voluntary positions, at the relevant church, at the relevant time, are occupied by the well-heeled with young kids.
 
I overheard some parents recently talking about how to get there children into schools. One said he was going the the Catholic church so that his kid could get into the local Catholic school. They note how many times u attend. You had to attend for a good amount of time for it to count. He also said that doing things like baking cakes for school events got points as well.
You'd imagine that you have to be admitted before they'll allow you to get involved in the school events.

When we tried attending church, you had to sign in if you had kids. It is the parent who signs in. With all the depravity that has gone on in the catholic church, it's probably not a bad idea to keep a record of which adults are at the child specific elements.
 
Last edited:
There is another school with Catholic ethos in between Streatham Hill and Clapham, http://www.thelaurelsschool.org.uk/

I think it will take the first kids next September.

£3,900 per child per term. £12 grand a year, give or take, before you've bought a uniform or gone on a school trip. 40% reduction for the third child though. £31k instead of £36k if you have three kids.
I wondered what happened to the building previously occupied by Mosaic Clubhouse.
As you would expect in Lambeth there has been some asset stripping jiggery pokery.
Close down the Effra day centre for the mentally ill. Sell the clubhouse building off. Move clubhouse into the Effra building.
Bingo. Effra re-opens as a work-related centre for the mentally ill (i.e. Mosaic Clubhouse)
You have a £12,000 a year Catholic private school for girls belonging to the top nobs you are attracting into the borough (with added large family discount for following the Catholic line on birth control).
And no Effra day centre to fund.
Well done Donatus And Lambeth Social Services (not forgetting whichever estate agent is performing the function of Borough Valuer these days!
 
Last edited:
Gentrification celebration on the Josephine Avenue notice board in SW2
hu7asegy.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom