Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

White civil rights leader has pretended to be black for years

It's great word, the ongoing work of making race - mirrors E.P Thompson's making of the English working class, we were present at our own birth one way or another.

Odd as in unusual or unexpected, a neologism I'd never seen before - 'Race is the witchcraft our times'. Thanks for the upload - another on the list.
 
Racecraft is a good word, and that article is spot on.

But even though our racial categories are socially constructed, that still doesn't give us room as individuals to choose whichever category we like - they're still socially (ie collectively) constructed, not individually constructed.

And in this case, butchers is right. She's just a great big liar. In that vid, you can smell the smoke from her flaming pants.
 
Has she used the word trans in relation to herself? has she, in fact, made any of the arguments about 'feeling black' etc that may serve as a useful comparison with transgender?

Why is so much stuff being invented about this ?

No. Which is why I conceded to C66 that he had a fair point and that this is all rather speculative.

It's only a matter of time until someone does, though.
 
OBVIOUSLY she did

She appropriated someone else's story for the sake of her self-image - I don't know enough of the detail to know what she then did with that.

Edit: you'd expect an effective civil rights leader to be amplifying and articulating the experiences of others, not silencing them (I don't know enough about her reputation to say whether she did that effectively until now). I don't like the idea that you create a given number of posts and you've then ticked the 'listening to black women' box - smacks of bean counter equality appeasement.

I see the main harms as being the inauthenticity of what she did and the way it feeds into right-wing 'crying racism where there is none' tropes, and also the inevitable conflation people will make between a history of oppression and a lifestyle choice.

She may have been ineffective due to the fakeness of her identity and experience, of course, but you wouldn't want someone ineffective in the post anyway.
 
Last edited:
She appropriated someone else's story for the sake of her self-image - I don't know enough of the detail to know what she then did with that.

Where to start? She faked her ethnicity at Howard University in order to get a grant for her high ed diploma which she then used to teach at an African Studies department of another uni and so on, and rise and shine as an NAACP spokesperson while presenting herself as someone living the terror of death threats for reasons of her [fake] ethnicity.
 
What she did (the deception) was certainly wrong.

However, as a general point - if we accept that identity is an internal feeling rather than based on external markers/lived experience...

Identity is (according to the majority of extant social science and psychological research) partly based on external markers, partly on lived experience, and partly on the individual interpellating with facets of identity that appeal to that individual (i.e."feelings").

...then why shouldn't someone with white parents identify as black? If Rachel Dolezal had just quietly got on with her life, feeling black and living as a black woman, would there be a problem?

Probably not. As it is, she used the black identity she took on in a way that personally benefited her. IMO she needs to make some sort of restitution for that.
 
Where to start? She faked her ethnicity at Howard University in order to get a grant for her high ed diploma which she then used to teach at an African Studies department of another uni and so on, and rise and shine as an NAACP spokesperson while presenting herself as someone living the terror of death threats for reasons of her [fake] ethnicity.

Yeah this.
 
Where to start? She faked her ethnicity at Howard University in order to get a grant for her high ed diploma which she then used to teach at an African Studies department of another uni and so on, and rise and shine as an NAACP spokesperson while presenting herself as someone living the terror of death threats for reasons of her [fake] ethnicity.

I didn't see the bit about faking her ethnicity for a grant (which is obviously fraudulent), but I'm not sure which point you're trying to address.

The deceit itself does harm, but in terms of advocacy work she seemed to be getting a measured amount of back-up according to the CNN article (I was Googling around looking for background since I have suspicions about Buzzfeed's status as a quality journalism source at times).

NAACP said:
"One's racial identity is not a qualifying criteria or disqualifying standard for NAACP leadership... the NAACP Alaska-Oregon-Washington State Conference stands behind Ms. Dolezal's advocacy record.

That doesn't mean they stand behind everything she is alleged to have done, obv.
 
Last edited:

Because it's not possible to transition from one "race" to another, even if you've actually managed to arrive at an agreed definition of "race". The only way people can metaphorically transition is through changing the meaning(s) attached to membership of a particular "race" so that it gains "acceptability. I once again call peoples' attention to Noel Ignatieff's "How the Irish Became White" (America-centric, but a good example of changed meanings driving metaphorical transition).
 
it must take an enormous amount of front to carry on such a sham, even so far as to be head of the NAACP.

Reminds me of that conman they made a film out of, the one who posed as airline pilot and all sorts.
 
it must take an enormous amount of front to carry on such a sham, even so far as to be head of the NAACP.

Reminds me of that conman they made a film out of, the one who posed as airline pilot and all sorts.
She wasn't head of the naacp - she was like the head of tring naacp.
 
Back
Top Bottom