Hamlet Pete
Well-Known Member
Nobody mention hedgehogs...
Hardy think one player is going to make a difference, they’re all fucking useless and you can include the nanagement in there too.I have factual evidence one of your players 'threw' a game recently. Didnt bet on Dulwich we have been warned to stay well away. Some of your players are have open ears. Your better than this.
Wrong. All it takes is one player in 'midfield' to put in a strange performance every now and then. Changes the whole game. I told you there is an investigation going on. I'm sure the hierarchy have been informed?Hardy think one player is going to make a difference, they’re all fucking useless and you can include the nanagement in there too.
Indeed Sir you are correct. You only have to ask Boston United midfielder Andy Thanoj. The snap team caught him in the end and he had a 6 month suspension for betting offences. Usually these beleagurent people blend themselves in 'bigger crowd' clubs and are offered substantial digits way above their match wage. They are approached by 3rd parties connected to a group of betting sites very innocently. Once their head is turned and they receive their instructions no one else in the club knows a thing.Without wanting to accidentally infer that our special correspondent here is some sort of David Conn, the wider point here that betting companies should be allowed to offer a market on something that the participants earn next to nothing from is surely wrong.
On the one hand, it’s all relative, and the amount staked on a Premier League game will be thousands of times more than even the highest weekly wage of the players on the pitch, whereas at Conference South level the ratio will be smaller. But still, the fact that a player might earn I dunno £500 for a game but could potentially earn ten times that for throwing one in… To my mind it means the market shouldn’t be allowed.
And to emphasise. I’m not saying I believe this conspiracy theory.
If you're going to make up allegations at least get the names of our players rightNo it's not Robbie Vint and I love all animals just not people who throw games.
Wrong. All it takes is one player in 'midfield' to put in a strange performance every now and then. Changes the whole game. I told you there is an investigation going on. I'm sure the hierarchy have been informed?
Then produce this 'factual evidence' NOW please.I have factual evidence one of your players 'threw' a game recently. Didnt bet on Dulwich we have been warned to stay well away. Some of your players are have open ears. Your better than this.
Mind you, it would be no surprise if Hamlet do get the attention of betting syndicates given the fact we've got a high profile employee of Paddy Power on our board.Without wanting to accidentally infer that our special correspondent here is some sort of David Conn, the wider point here that betting companies should be allowed to offer a market on something that the participants earn next to nothing from is surely wrong.
On the one hand, it’s all relative, and the amount staked on a Premier League game will be thousands of times more than even the highest weekly wage of the players on the pitch, whereas at Conference South level the ratio will be smaller. But still, the fact that a player might earn I dunno £500 for a game but could potentially earn ten times that for throwing one in… To my mind it means the market shouldn’t be allowed.
And to emphasise. I’m not saying I believe this conspiracy theory.
Well I guess the claims are legit as this hasn't been removed.
What would be considered an acceptable bung to throw a game in whatever league DHFC is in?
Great. I can afford to get the whole team on board.
Great. I can afford to get the whole team on board.
Have you considered that they might just have a natural talent for it, but takes your money anyway?Ive been paying for Tooting to be shit for ages.
Have you considered that they might just have a natural talent for it, but takes your money anyway?