Frying pans and eggs included.
No need to bring a gas hobWe should open up a soup kitchen.
Did anyone manage a fry-up?
Or focus the light on solar panels on the roofs across the road.If the windows could be angled individually by motors to further enhance the sun rays, the building would make a very cool Bond supervillain weapon
Frying pans and eggs included.
Was it called the Pint Glass? Never heard that!When the hell did we stop calling this building 'the pint glass'!! I have been misinforming visitors for months now...enjoyed watching it go up...its going to be a wibbly wobbly bridge situ all over again. Something quite snigger raising about such monumental cock-ups though, makes mine fade into insignificance..
I work around there and I quite like it. It's not a million miles away from the other skyscrapers either, the Heron tower must be further. What's really making a mess is the Pinnacle being a building site.I think it looks great up close. The splayed fins and subtle curves are very graceful. The over-curving glass means you see reflections of the city as well as the sky. But I still think it's an ugly addition to the skyline. Squat and bulbous and overbearing. It's all on its own as well, making a mess of the "cluster" of towers in the City. "The Sore Thumb" is a better epithet, IMO.
What's really making a mess is the Pinnacle being a building site.
Yeah, work has been stopped on it for ages. I'm not surprised because there's a lot of new office space with these new skyscrapers, where are they going to get companies to let them out to?.Is that the one where the developer went bust? Is it still at a standstill?
It's been, what, a couple of years now? It'll be interesting to see what happens, it's not that far advanced - I wonder if demolition and a different scheme is a possibility?Yeah, work has been stopped on it for ages. I'm not surprised because there's a lot of new office space with these new skyscrapers, where are they going to get companies to let them out to?.
They have the foundations and a bit of the core built up, I wonder if they can be re-used?. Crispy ??It's been, what, a couple of years now? It'll be interesting to see what happens, it's not that far advanced - I wonder if demolition and a different scheme is a possibility?
They have the foundations and a bit of the core built up, I wonder if they can be re-used?. Crispy ??
Is that Tower 42/Nat West Tower?What is the one that has a top third all bright green at night time - can't see the outline properly from the South so couldn't place it properly...
The original developer didn't get the investment they needed. They built the basement and core stub as a gamble, to make investors impressed. It didn't work. The major investor, Arab Investments has now bought the project and has commissioned multiple option designs for a replacement, which may or may not re-use the existing basement+core. It will probably be as tall, but not as extravagant.They have the foundations and a bit of the core built up, I wonder if they can be re-used?. Crispy ??
Maybe...ph i did the marlow to henley walk last week on a glorious day,armed with your blog...will post pics on that thread soon....fantastic walk.Is that Tower 42/Nat West Tower?
im sure thats true, but i was on the platform at london bridge today thinking how ugly the shard is up close - those square bits at the bottom are crap - it already looks dated, never mind the general phallic shityness of it, and look across at the walkie talkie which you can just about see, by contrast at least and on relative terms it looked pretty good.I was near the Design Museum past tower bridge at the weekend. Looking back at the city what disaster this tower is ! How did it ever get planning permission ? messes with the views of Tower of London and Tower Bridge.
im sure thats true, but i was on the platform at london bridge today thinking how ugly the shard is up close - those square bits at the bottom are crap - it already looks dated, never mind the general phallic shityness of it, and look across at the walkie talkie which you can just about see, by contrast at least and on relative terms it looked pretty good.
Talking of spoiling views and such check out the horrible glass and steel thing they built directly opposite the Tower of London, just over the bridge - completely out of keeping with the buildings around it - that Thistle hotel at least blends in.
Developers have unveiled plans to install aluminium fins on the "Walkie-Talkie" to prevent the sun's rays reflecting from the skyscraper.
Land Securities and Canary Wharf Group have submitted a planning application to the City of London for a brise soleil system.
The system will prevent solar glare by absorbing sunlight, they said.
The 37-storey building in the City of London had started fires and caused damage to nearby businesses.
It was said not only to have melted parts of a Jaguar, but also blistered paintwork and caused tiles to fall.
The proposals say a series of horizontal aluminium fins will be installed across the southern side of the building from level 3 to 34.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-26161175
on the other hand, with some small adjustments, it could be a grand spot to push a banker into eternityLooks like that promised public sky garden is turning into more of a 'keep walking and then bugger off' kind of arrangement.
View attachment 65951
http://www.ianvisits.co.uk/blog/2015/01/04/as-the-walkie-talkie-prepares-to-open-to-the-public/