DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
and the stones have been in an episode.
more than one surelyand the stones have been in an episode.
I can only recall seeing 1, a kind ogf School of Rock parody. Not one of the best. Wouldn't be suprised to know theyd done more though.more than one surely
Where's my burrito! Where's my burrito!I think most critic agree that the finest episodes and series are all in the 1st ten years, and it's now going onto it's 25th season.
I've been reading about some of the great episodes. Last Exit to Springfield is generally regarded as the show's finest episode
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Exit_to_Springfield
Where's my burrito! Where's my burrito!
Didn't realize he did all those voices. Too many eggs in one basket!
I think most of the cast provide the voices for several parts Shearer isn't even the most prolific of the regular cast.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Simpsons_cast_members
Very few programs are timeless when it comes to comedy.
Only Fools and Horses, however, is one of them!
I think we're on to a winner ere, Trig, play it nice n cool, you know what I mean.Because it was never that funny
Because it was never that funny
You saying only fools and horses aint funny? Come one!
Conan O'Brien, and four of the original writers of the Simspons talk about the early evolution of the show.
One of the more interesting points they raise is that the Simpsons was a Bart centric show in the opening shows, but gradually the show moved to Homer because "how many stories can you tell with a ten year old boy". So you have Homer as a Fireman, and then a Hippy.
I've never found any of it funny as either a child or an as an adult.
Yeah, it's a huge gamble to take, but it's not like the Simpsons are on a winning formula now. I've noticed my suggestions would bring the Simpsons closer to Modern Family, that has won, what, 5 Emmys for best Comedy in a row?
He's 71
Homer turned into Peter Griffin. For so much crap MacFarlane took from aping from the Simpsons, the Simpsons writers room certainly looked at what made Family Guy popular, and decided it was the shitty, completely disfunctional family, not the rapid-firing pop-culture jokes or the absurdist flashbacks and cuts. As shitty as FG is right now, I'll still defend it was a much different show before the Simpsons writers decided to tap the same source of "adult" humour.I could see that working somewhat, the episode where we see Lisa at Uni for example seems well regarded and it mean you could focus the story on other characters than Homer occasionally
Homer did move on from being well meaning but dumb to actually dangerous and unpleasant at some point in the shows history and its purely to keep the series going for the sake of keeping it going, theres no story there.
Homer turned into Peter Griffin.
by 99 (when FG debuted) the called Jerkass Homer had already been showing off a lot (influence of South Park?), but I'm not arguing there aren't similarities between FG and The Simpsons. The thing is FG very rarely tried to have the human heart The Simpsons did. It was a gag vehicle from the get-go, something the plot-oriented Simpsons steered towards after FG started to look like the future for Fox.I'd say Homer was well on the way towards Peter Griffin territory before Family Guy, then Family guy turned up and both of them seemed to go all out to one up each other and take queues from each other. Hell you can see how similar FG is to the Simpsons is in its first season before fixing on the idiot man-child aspect.