London_Calling
Pleasant and unpatronising
It looks like, well, a shard to me.
Sub-Tolkein drivel at the top of the Shard
I assume you're on about this
Piano's first design for the Shard was completed in 2000, over a year before even Peter Jackson's first instalment of the LoTR trilogy was released.
Multiple megawatt laser for shooting a dazzling beam of light 100km into the night sky. Please.
Tends to undermine criticism when the only alternative offered in unfunny and unhelpful.Public gardens with benches, a fountain in the middle, and a tea-hut painted green.
Tends to undermine criticism when the only alternative offered in unfunny and unhelpful.
There's actually a fairly decent amount of public space been created as part of the More London/City Hall development just round the corner.
Yes it'll be the tallest building in London, but IMO, it'll also be one of the worlds best looking skyscrapers.
Another benefit to the area is the rebuiilding of the bus station outside the station, and the entrance concourse too. Should be much more peasant.
Should be much more peasant.
Yes it'll be the tallest building in London, but IMO, it'll also be one of the worlds best looking skyscrapers.
How will the Shard benefit those already working in or travelling through London Bridge on a regular basis?
Enthusiasm for it seems to be almost entirely down to its projected height.
Well, the construction alone is providing me with plenty of entertainment, and I pass through London Bridge station twice a day on my commute.
No. It's a building by Renzo Piano and IMHO one of the most exciting skyscrapers that's been built in London for a very long time, if ever. I am a fan of Piano, I'll admit, largely because of his mastery of detailing.
Richard Rogers' 122 Leadenhall promises to be close if it does eventually get built, which is getting more likely, although the project is on hold at the moment.
That both Piano and Rogers worked together on the Pompidou Centre may not be entirely coincidence.
Which is why very tall buildings like this are restricted to the central City and canary wharf. Nobody proposes out of scale things like centre point any moreGuess you're either into skyscrapers or you're not. I'm not keen on them for London, I don't want the city to look like Shanghai or New York or wherever. Too many would impose on the skyline. I like to be able to see the shapes of the hills and a mixture of buildings and structures old and new: church spires, gas holders, tower blocks.
Which is why very tall buildings like this are restricted to the central City and canary wharf. Nobody proposes out of scale things like centre point any more
I think part of the plan is to bring the City to Southwark, or expand south of the river if you prefer.The Shard isn't going to be in the City though. It's an encroachment on riverside Southwark, which has had a different character to the City for many centuries. I think it is out of scale to its surroundings. It's going to loom over the whole district between Blackfriars Road and Tower Bridge Road.