Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Planes that never were

Horten Ho-229 :cool:

8G2P2048.jpg


latest
 
Wouldn't this have been essentially unflyable, given the instability of the design?

No, it flew fine although apparently it was a bit of a handful on approach. Erwin Ziller was supposed to have beaten an Me-262 in a dogfight in the second prototype and flew it at 500mph. Ziller was killed by an engine failure hopefully due to sabotage by slave labour at the Junkers factory.
 
Well, it's nice to think so (and thanks for the response).

How much (if any) of what the Horten brothers did is present in today's similar looking aircraft? Did they get paperclipped after 1945?

The Hortens legged it to Argentina once festivities ended where they tried to build cargo aircraft with little success.

The Northrop-Grumman pedigree in flying wing designs predates WW2 and so wasn't directly influenced by the Hortens' work. Jack Northrop drew influence from earlier American and French designers. (As did the Hortens.)
 
I know an out of work rocket scientist and a heavy lifting expert if Proletarian Democracy can somehow foot the bill to rescue the Buran space program.
But we don't need to go and refill spy satellites with 60 miles of film anymore.... Although perhaps retro espionage could be a kind of cool thing.
 
Do hang gliders get a look-in?

The Ryan XV-8 Flexwing.

Good for dropping everything from your ass, to missiles and re-entry vehicles from space plus much inbetween.

6334748275_375983fd63_b.jpg


6335507318_fd0b265588_b.jpg


6335506588_01094c497e_b.jpg


6334749927_ae2d662d50_b.jpg


From the ever amazing and inspiring collection of the SDASM Archives - SDASM Archives
Which if you take the time to have a good dig contains a great number of one-offs, special projects and mad ideas from Convair/General Dynamics and associated companies.

And yes, they did get something in the air:

107-1.jpg
 
Do hang gliders get a look-in?

The Ryan XV-8 Flexwing.

Good for dropping everything from your ass, to missiles and re-entry vehicles from space plus much inbetween.

6334748275_375983fd63_b.jpg


6335507318_fd0b265588_b.jpg


6335506588_01094c497e_b.jpg


6334749927_ae2d662d50_b.jpg


From the ever amazing and inspiring collection of the SDASM Archives - SDASM Archives
Which if you take the time to have a good dig contains a great number of one-offs, special projects and mad ideas from Convair/General Dynamics and associated companies.

And yes, they did get something in the air:

107-1.jpg

Gemini with wing. They have just got one of the two test models at the Leicester Space Centre.

paraglider%2006.jpg
 
Blue Gemini and Big Gemini as well, maybe capsules would have been better than the fantastic dead end that was the shuttle?

AA2079_Gemini_real_1.jpg


b8c94207722a3f12665d757ca15e766c.jpg


BigGemini-Starboard.jpg


Big_Gemini_mockup.jpg
 
The Soviet LK Luna module. I saw it at the recent Science Museum Cosmonauts exhibition.

f5f93c1d5b0b2cf68fe6427625d5273d.jpg
 
Blohm und Voss P170 Schnellbomber. This was probably a decent concept from the ever fertile mind of Doktor Vogt but the design was overlooked by Ehard Milch's (Luftwaffe head of aircraft production) increasingly manic obsession with jet engines.

BV_170.jpg


Charming historical footnote: At the end of the war Feldmarschall Milch surrended his marshal's baton with great ceremony to a British army Brigadier who duly accepted the baton and broke it over the Nazi's head. :thumbs:
 
Blohm und Voss P170 Schnellbomber. This was probably a decent concept from the ever fertile mind of Doktor Vogt but the design was overlooked by Ehard Milch's (Luftwaffe head of aircraft production) increasingly manic obsession with jet engines.

BV_170.jpg


Charming historical footnote: At the end of the war Feldmarschall Milch surrended his marshal's baton with great ceremony to a British army Brigadier who duly accepted the baton and broke it over the Nazi's head. :thumbs:

Fuel tank to engine ratio looks shit
 
Fuel tank to engine ratio looks shit

It was a very efficient low drag design and the central fuselage is one giant fuel tank ~6,200lbs. I didn't know that number. There are limits even to my tragically encyclopeadic knowledge of aircraft. I had to look it up in my copy of Luftwaffe Secret Projects: Ground Attack and Special Purpose Aircraft.
 
It was a very efficient low drag design and the central fuselage is one giant fuel tank ~6,200lbs. I didn't know that number. There are limits even to my tragically encyclopeadic knowledge of aircraft. I had to look it up in my copy of Luftwaffe Secret Projects: Ground Attack and Special Purpose Aircraft.

Hand n't figured on the rear of the engine gondoliers being fuel tanks, 2000litre each apparently. Say 0.69 kg/l


Empty weight 9100kg. Max take off weight 13300kg.......I now know who came up with the addition tanks on the ACJ319
 
my copy of Luftwaffe Secret Projects: Ground Attack and Special Purpose Aircraft.

Which you keep under the bed, with your back issues of Big Ones Monthly.

avro-730-vigilant-b-ia-sr-i-ii-fsx1.jpg



"The Avro 730 was a planned Mach 3 reconnaissance aircraft and strategic bomber for the Royal Air Force. If it had proceeded into service, the aircraft would have replaced the V bombers as the primary nuclear weapons delivery system for Britain's nuclear deterrent.[2] It was cancelled in 1957 along with other development on manned aircraft as part of the 1957 Defence White Paper."


Avro 730 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Back
Top Bottom