Yep. And there's plenty of people in the system only too happy to help, whilst they publicly name and shame those on the bottom of the heap skimming a few quid while struggling to make ends meet. It makes me so fucking angry.that planes scam is such a rich cunts scam, who among us pays any attention to the rules on what tax you pay when buying a plane? I for one cannot say its a subject that I was ever interested in. Until now.
Prince Charles campaigned to alter climate-change agreements without disclosing his private estate had an offshore financial interest in what he was promoting, BBC Panorama has found.
The Paradise Papers show the Duchy of Cornwall in 2007 secretly bought shares worth $113,500 in a Bermuda company that would benefit from a rule change.
The prince was a friend of a director of Sustainable Forestry Management Ltd.
SFM is no longer in existence.
certainly never chosen to speak out on a topic simply because of a company that it may have invested in.
Panorama has been unable to find evidence of any speeches the prince made before 2008 about changing Kyoto and EU ETS to include carbon credits for rainforests. The programme asked the prince's office for any such speeches but they did not respond.
Private equity firm Blackstone avoided tens of millions of pounds in UK taxes on property deals in Glasgow and London, the Paradise Papers show.
The documents reveal it used offshore companies to purchase and operate the St Enoch Shopping Centre in Glasgow and Chiswick Business Park in London.
One argument put forward by the IFC was that increased transparency would expose offshore territories to “endless media stories” by investigative journalists, as well as unwelcome scrutiny by tax campaigners and NGOs.
Appleby was a founding partner of the IFC, set up in 2009 to “counter dated stereotypes and inaccurate assumptions” about the offshore sector.
“Our point about possible loss of leverage with the US was repeated by PM Cameron as his reason for not proceeding with public registers, almost certainly stimulated by our representations.”
“The forum had superb penetration of UK policymakers in the lead-up to the G8 through cabinet, Treasury, the FCO and HMRC,” an agenda for the call said.
The following year, with reforms once again being mooted, Appleby asked its partners to contribute reasons for pushing back against more transparency.
It suggested “incidences of kidnapping, extortion or blackmail in G8 countries that were motivated by access to publically available data about an individual” would be useful to make the argument.
If this loophole was closed in 1991 wtf are HMRC doing NOT policing it?
so if you as a US citizen worked in suadi arabia where there is no tax you'd still have to pay tax to uncle sam? well.
have noticed that american state does jail even 'big' people for tax rip offs.
Really?All the loopholes could be closed quite easily if the will was there. But of course those that do this shit are the ones making the rules, so holding your breath may not be the healthy choice.
In the US the system is better, all US citizens pay US tax wherever they earn it, be it income, capital gains, anything. They deduct the local tax you have paid and you pay any balance to the US treasury. It's a good system which mostly works and means that any off-shoring business is tax evasion and not avoidance. Hence why no Americans bother living in Monaco.
A few years ago the US treasury went after the Swiss banks, who in spite of all their bullshit about numbered accounts coughed at the very first suggestion that their directors could be hauled off the States for some money laundering trials. But they stopped there and didn't go after all the other places which exist pretty much exclusively as tax havens, maybe they will now these papers are out there, or maybe that's where those who run things in the US stash their loot?
ExactlyYes, if for example the US tax rate is 30% and the Saudi one is 10%, you pay the 10% to Saudi and 20% to the US. Of course salaries in Saudi can be massive compared to the US and perks like housing, flights etc. can be untaxable, so Americans do still go and work there.
And yeah, they do go after the big boys occasionally and due to the scale that these people operate, once they are convicted they tend to get sentences in the 100's of years. Which is why the Swiss rolled over so easily.
Exactly
100 years for extradited Swiss employees, slap on the wrist for Yankee Punters
Empires were ever thus
Delaware - half a million companies registered in a shithole with a population of a million.
You were making sense but your need to bow to US views ( Trans:- suck yankee cock vigrus loik) has deluded you;-In the US the system is better, all US citizens pay US tax wherever they earn it, be it income, capital gains, anything. They deduct the local tax you have paid and you pay any balance to the US treasury. It's a good system which mostly works and means that any off-shoring business is tax evasion and not avoidance. Hence why no Americans bother living in Monaco.
I assume you support Piracy as the way forward for small Dorset and Devon seaports "had to get known for something" to launch their Sons to "Galleon Seek" at the Queens Pleasure?Be fair, it had to get known for something.