camouflage
gaslit at scale.
Do we count the TRIPS bodycount of people in the 3rd world that could have been saved by cheaper pharmaceuticals?
This from chomsky has stuck in my mind for years:
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Chomsky/ChomOdon_ElSalvador.html
beg pardon,but why?Sorry, nothing pre 20th century. No offence.
http://www.newstatesman.com/200112170007By any measure, this is a war of the rich against the poor. Look at the casualty figures. The toll, says the World Resources Institute, is more than 13 million children every year; or 12 million under the age of five, according to United Nations estimates. "If 100 million have been killed in the formal wars of the 20th century," wrote Michael McKinley, "why are they to be privileged in comprehension over the annual [death] toll of children from structural adjustment programmes since 1982?"
When did 'liberalism' become a synonym for 'capitalism' and 'colonialism?'
well, monarchistic then. I was also thinking about the spanish in south america- monarchy again.
Not really fair to blame all the death on liberals there.Unless you feel the Kaisers mob and the Nazis were liberal democracies.(Though some tea party loon probably would argue Hitler was a socialist so any things possible).
Since about 1847.
So therefore we shouldn't criticise actual classical liberalism in any way, shape, or form.
So therefore we shouldn't criticise actual classical liberalism in any way, shape, or form.
In the US, ultra-conservative gasbags like Rush Limbaugh are using the word 'liberalism' as shorthand for any ideology to the left of theirs.
300 000 Indian farmer suicides over the last few decades - direct result of neo-liberalism.
Several times that iirc. Plus millions in korea
Well it has.I didn't realize that 'neo liberalism' had been around for decades.
I didn't realize that 'neo liberalism' had been around for decades.
Well it has.
I didn't realize that 'neo liberalism' had been around for decades.
So: when did 'liberalism' end, and 'neo liberalism' begin?
So: when did 'liberalism' end, and 'neo liberalism' begin?
Neoliberalism describes a market-driven[1] approach to economic and social policy based on neoclassical theories of economics that stresses the efficiency of private enterprise, liberalized trade and relatively open markets, and therefore seeks to maximize the role of the private sector in determining the political and economic priorities of the state.
So: when did 'liberalism' end, and 'neo liberalism' begin?
Wikipedia defines 'neoliberalism thusly:
That sounds a lot like 'capitalism'. Does it really need a new name?
Keynes and the New Deal arguably ended liberalism.
Neoliberalism describes a market-driven[1] approach to economic and social policy based on neoclassical theories of economics that stresses the efficiency of private enterprise, liberalized trade and relatively open markets, and therefore seeks to maximize the role of the private sector in determining the political and economic priorities of the state.
This definition from wikipedia
is pretty much the antithesis of Keynsianism.
Maybe you should read some economic history? Great depression, response to that, crises of 1970s, response to that, sort of thing
Wikipedia defines 'neoliberalism thusly:
That sounds a lot like 'capitalism'. Does it really need a new name?