Is the photo on it's side or is that the way it's meant to be viewed?View attachment 17670 A friends coffee shop on a Tuesday morning
I had the exact same feeling when I first saw it. Compositionally it's great, but there is nothing to continue the story IYKWIM.Compositionally, it's excellent. You've got the photograph neatly divided into thirds - beach, land, and sky. Everything is artisticly indistinct, giving the whole a slightly abstract feel. The only distinct thing is the contrail. This allows the viewer to superimpose their own youngsters on the children in the foreground. And therein it fails as art. It's too bland and generic.
Is the photo on it's side or is that the way it's meant to be viewed?
I live not far from that place. I was actually on the other side of it and didn't even know that passeway existed. If anyone's ever going let me know. Would love to photograph it.Where is that?
Yep, it's on the piss. Assuming the pic shown is the full source image, if you correct it you'll knock out the edges when cropped to a rectangle, but since it's all empty blue, just make up some more (PS' Content Aware Fill will do nicely).I really like this photo. It's very well composed, and the color tones are sumptuous.
If you're looking for critiqe: it feels just slightly crooked. You can see it if you look at the shoreline and the trees. Probably 1% correction would handle it.
No. There's no important verticals or horizontals - and water is flat, so it's not about some false manipulation that will break something else, it's just about making it look right.If he straightens the shoreline, won't that then put the boat at an awkward angle?
Lovely photo that with a few tweaks could be made really good - lowered gamma and black point, darkened sky with graduated mask and straightened horizon (1.5° anticlockwise).
View attachment 19245
It's too large to post here (about 9MB). PM me with your email address and I'll send it to you.Are you able to enlarge that to the same size as the original? I'd like to be able to compare the overall impact with equivalent sizes.
[I'm not technically proficient enough to do it myself.]
I could make it smaller than 9MB by increasing the jpeg compression. I saved it at 100% quality from the original file on Flickr.The 9MB file size from taking a picture from this page seems excessive.
Here it is, criticism welcome:
It just doesn't work for me. You've cropped it, haven't you? There's a person in the background chopped in half. Also, your subject is looking off to the viewer's left (his right). He really needs to be looking at the ball. Why do you have that ball in the foreground, anyway? Perhaps if you were to crop it some more, cutting out that ball and the person chopped in half?
Cheers for the comment, it's appreciated.
Here it is, criticism welcome:
Small version:
View attachment 19346
Bigger version:
View attachment 19344
All criticism welcome. I'm a beginner. Cropped from a bigger shot (too much crap in the background). Looks over exposed. Probably picked the wrong day (grey sky) and doesn't look particularly sharp. Suggestions?
I think you need to be a bit further back. The sculpture is imposing enough that it needs a bit more of the surroundings to give it place. It's also hard to tell what's behind it on the right. It might be a building, or it might be overexposed sky.
It was a grey day. I'll take a few more shots of it so you can get some context. The problem with moving further back is that it's surrounded by estate agents and other random shops etc which I didn't really want in the shot.
Good thing about outdoor sculptures etc, is they can always be revisited. There are a couple of places around here that I go back to every couple of years to see if my take on the place has changed.