Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

submit a photo to the urban75 critics

4880083150


here is mine
 
4880083150


here is mine

It's a photo of a poster. What are we supposed to be criticising - the photo or the poster?

The poster is OK. The photo is of no particular worth other than that it depicts an OK poster. It's not taken flat-on and you haven't even bothered to crop out the bit of another frame at the bottom.

PS you can't make an embedded image from a link to a web page. You should just post the link to the page like this:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sammyi/4880083150/
 
Taken on a mobile from a moving car.

c7.jpg

Although the murky atmosphere is quite appealing, it's not an especially good photograph. It's not surprising to learn that it was snapped from a moving car because it doesn't give the impression that any care has been given to its composition. For me the fact that it's not level (giving the impression that everything is leaning to the right) is distracting. I agree with the other comment that the fact the bench is "skeletal" helps with the ghostlyness. However, it's lost somewhat in the general darkness at the bottom of the picture.

Including something in the foreground might have helped. Then there would have been a clearer progression from a sharply defined silhouette in the foreground to the misty fuzziness in the background. The nearest object to the camera is the tree on the right which is awkwardly cropped out along its trunk.

Converting it to black and white might help too. Apart from anything else it might help disguise the low quality of the image resulting from the camera used.
 
Bike polo

4971953295_d36d0f6f8a_z.jpg


bog standard shot, nothing special

I think the wheel to the right detracts from essential focus of the picture. The luminous wheel to the left is a nice effect but the blur to the right doesn't have quite enough punch to merit inclusion. It's quite an interesting image with action and light aplenty without the extra factor of the blurred wheel.
 
Next time I'll ask the guys not to play polo but just to pose in a convenient position so that there are no blurry distractions :mad:
 
I mean it looks like something from a 1992 photo/stock library catalogue in style and content.

cool it was taken last week

what cultural references are you basing this on? or is it something about lighting or development?

was using a semi fish eye big in 1992? can you link me to some examples of this stock photography please
 
What do you reckon to this panorama I took in Rome a few years ago? That's my missus to the left btw

Click for image

Should've taken it from the other end to prevent the sun washing out what looks like quite an interesting sky

I like the little shopping trolley thing on the left, that would have made a nice subject for a closer pic :)
 
Should've taken it from the other end to prevent the sun washing out what looks like quite an interesting sky

I like the little shopping trolley thing on the left, that would have made a nice subject for a closer pic :)

No idea where that trolley came from, it wasn't ours though now you mention it it does look kind of interesting.

I did get one from the other side but there's hardly any sky in it. This one from the top of the Palatine hill has some sky in it though plus a look across the forum.

Click for image
 
mrvm28.jpg


Taken at Blackpool Zoo. Damn thing kept moving around like it was on speed, finally got to take a picture of the little fecker when it kepts still for a second.
 
Bike polo

4971953295_d36d0f6f8a_z.jpg


bog standard shot, nothing special

Nice photo. There are a couple of nice contrasts working for it - one being the blur of the tire to the right compared to the clarity of the two figures; the other being the nearness of that wheel contrasted with the figures in the distance. The only thing it's lacking, imo, is something with a bit of clarity, maybe in the top right corner, to give a bit more balance. The photo is pretty heavily weighted toward the left.
 
Back
Top Bottom