ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Only as long as the free Krug doesn't run out.
Surely you're not implying that Lambeth's Councillors are venal freeloaders?
Only as long as the free Krug doesn't run out.
The person Editor refers to in post 129, of course. And you?What person are you talking about? There's no relevance in your posts to the ones of mine you are replying to - are you talking to yourself?
In the context of architecture, "refurbish" usually means "repair to original condition", not "structurally and cosmetically alter" (which is what they've actually done), I think
so you're arguing with editor in replies to my posts which make no mention of any such person - are you ok?The person Editor refers to in post 129, of course. And you?
Surely you're not implying that Lambeth's Councillors are venal freeloaders?
Perhaps you could now enlighten us all and tell us who you think gets to decide which actions a business take constitute genuine engagement with the local community, and which are just PR exercise, as per your claim in post 148.so you're arguing with editor in replies to my posts which make no mention of any such person - are you ok?
Oh, I would agree it is undefinable, and would add it is a matter of opinion. Which is why nobody really gets to decide the issue, and why lefteri's post was superfluous.I think lefteri's point is that it's "the local community" who gets to decide. In other words, it's sufficiently undefinable that we can argue about it here ad infinitum.
Your comment
made it sound like you had changed your mind since the exhibition - ie, at the time you thought it might be feasible that they could have a meaningful involvement in the ncommunity but that since then their actions have shown otherwise.
Suggested that you think there are things they could do which they are already not doing, or that they are actively doing things that displease you.
Yes really. They're a direct competitor and we have some of the exact same clients.
Times have changed. When I started here, we were doing local authority leisure centres, halls of residence and out-of-town office parks. Now it's all 5 star hotels, Bond Street boutiques and Mayfair apartments. They were the only jobs going during the recession and now it's all we do. It's fascinating work from an architectural POV, but also a sickening view into how the other 0.5% live.
So you can't give an example of a thing that you'd consider as "engaging the local community". Only note the absence of something. Fair enough: as you say they were the ones who mentioned it. I don't really know what "engaging the local community" actually means though.The exhibition was a very long time ago. As part of the present planning application.
Now it's almost completed. Several years have passed. I don't see they have done anything further to engage local community.
They are a profit making business. Working on high end developments mainly. I went to the present planning application to look at the plans. Which looked fine to me. On purely architectural view it's a good development.
I didn't need to hear the PR bollox to judge the plans.
Hefty book that.Gramsci went to British Association of Local History on Saturday. Picked up a copy of "Space, Hope and Brutalism - English architecture from 1945 - 1975" by Elain Harwood (reduced from £60 to £30). I think you might enjoy a coffee Sable book like that over coffee after the election?
This is true - I remember reading about Cedric Price - who went into private practice reluctantly because he was passed over by the local authority architects department, which is who he aspired to work forWhat's happened to architectural profession is reflection of what's changed in society. Post War if you trained as an architect it was likely you would go to work in a public sector team. Lambeth had one. Helping to rebuild post War Britain. Council housing , amenities and the new Universities for example.
tbf, he was bonkers (for the time)This is true - I remember reading about Cedric Price - who went into private practice reluctantly because he was passed over by the local authority architects department, which is who he aspired to work for
What an utter scumbag. Fuck you Patrik Schumacher, you worthless piece of shit.Zaha Hadid successor to run her practice forgot PR image to mouth off about "free loading " Council tenants. His unguarded statements reflects the mentality of those at the top of the profession.
Architect blasts 'free-riding' central London council tenants saying they should be moved
Exactly. And cherry-picking a few high profile, PR friendly causes to enhance their 'community' credentials is unlikely to have any positive impact on the wider community. It's all the same rich-company-PR-spin and I've seen it a hundred times.So Squires are a product of the system. They have done a good job on the building. They won't have any relevance to the people on the estate near me.
If they wanted refer to the building's history as part of the Bon Marché department store and yet be pretentious why didn't they say something like Bon Marché Annexe?I quite like the new green glass dome (although I liked the original copper dome too) but I'm not so sure about the big letters making it look like it is an actual department store rather than a showcase for architects to the super rich. But then that is a trend of gentrification: name buildings and businesses after the things that used to be there for an extra slice of authenticity.
View attachment 108808
What's happened to architectural profession is reflection of what's changed in society. Post War if you trained as an architect it was likely you would go to work in a public sector team. Lambeth had one. Helping to rebuild post War Britain. Council housing , amenities and the new Universities for example.
The Brixton Rec is an example. Part of the reason it was listed. An example of socialist architecture. This at the time made one part of the mainstream. You could be a socially commited architect and have a job. The architect Finch , who designed the Rec and his wife designed many public buildings. At a time post War when it was felt that ordinary people should have good facilities.
The last thirty eight years since Thatcher have seen the post War consensus dismantled. The end result being that architects now serve the needs of the rich and capital. That's the new consensus.
It's worse than just consensus it's now taken as just how things are. The natural order of things. So complaining appears worthy of ridicule.
Zaha Hadid successor to run her practice forgot PR image to mouth off about "free loading " Council tenants. His unguarded statements reflects the mentality of those at the top of the profession.
Architect blasts 'free-riding' central London council tenants saying they should be moved
I'm not blaming architects further down the food chain. There is a new generation of architects who are now critical if the way the profession has gone. ASH for example.
The architects working on the LJ project are another.
But the political climate is largely against them. Unless some like Corbyn gets into power.
So Squires are a product of the system. They have done a good job on the building. They won't have any relevance to the people on the estate near me.
Once the shopping centre goes, Elephant will truly be lost. Thankfully, developer/landowner fuckery is keeping it alive for now.
The one next door with the triangular balconeys is a bit better (and it appears to have some actually affordable housing attached at ground floor. Someone will tell me it's actually "affordable" now I'm sure...)I hate that new tower at Elephant. In the fiddly flimsy flim flam style.
Affordable, you say?The one next door with the triangular balconeys is a bit better (and it appears to have some actually affordable housing attached at ground floor. Someone will tell me it's actually "affordable" now I'm sure...)