Wow, how on earth did it take 5 hours to finish the game when the timer was something like... i can't remember, but just a few minutes? . I'd be pissed off too! That studio did look enormous and being filmed in Bedford - I can see how it'd get very cold... Anyway, it's confusing as I thought they'd compete/film the game in real time...Squid Game The Challenge: Players want compensation over injuries
A law firm says it is representing contestants it claims "suffered hypothermia and nerve damage" injuries.www.bbc.co.uk
Surprised me too.Wow, how on earth did it take 5 hours to finish the game when the timer was something like... i can't remember, but just a few minutes? . I'd be pissed off too! That studio did look enormous and being filmed in Bedford - I can see how it'd get very cold... Anyway, it's confusing as I thought they'd compete/film the game in real time...
Squid Game The Challenge: Players want compensation over injuries
A law firm says it is representing contestants it claims "suffered hypothermia and nerve damage" injuries.www.bbc.co.uk
Agree, ep:5 we were like ‘wankerssssss’I didn’t even think of the editing, let alone find it annoying. If I have to think of a criticism it would be…. two, actually: number of players the programme is following up close is too small given how many players are still in the game: and the nationality pool of the contestants is massively US-centric- at least those being featured regularly.
But whereas I had been hoping it would be good, like many others I had feared it was going to be shit, or best mediocre and devoid of any tension, considering the premise of the series it’s based on, and that the fact that, er, obviously nobody gets killed. And to their credit they have managed to create something gripping and often edge-of-seat so. And I speak as someone who doesn’t like reality shows much.
Above all for me, this is a massive social experiment exercise. It doesn’t reveal anything we don’t already know about human nature, but it’s absolutely absorbing to see the social interactions between the players.
The cleverest thing the show’s creators have done is introduce all those new games not seen in the original series. They are having far a more devastating effect on the players than the games from the original show.
ETA: I kept thinking episode five felt like a filler, but the ending…
They all deserved to be eliminated for that. They all knew what the marbles meant, and they all knew that it was the game coming up next. They should have been utterly on their guard against any attempt to get them to pair up. And they were fooled by picnic blankets? Staggering.
The timer was for five minutes, but they've got to get all the reaction shots from the players who turn out later to be notable. And everyone else can't move because of the wider continuity shot. Tho it [the legal case] does also sound like a bit of a set up to promote it to me. There must have been a reasonably detailed explanation of what was going to be involved (ie, standing around for a long time while things are shot and reshot)Wow, how on earth did it take 5 hours to finish the game when the timer was something like... i can't remember, but just a few minutes? . I'd be pissed off too! That studio did look enormous and being filmed in Bedford - I can see how it'd get very cold... Anyway, it's confusing as I thought they'd compete/film the game in real time...
I was impressed tooCan we consider Phill?
The most plausible explanation for his Circle of Trust performance is that he has a keenly developed sense of smell.
It’s an okay game show but I feel a bit glum watching it because the original show was this wonderful drama about inequality and desperation — people carried on playing even when they knew they would probably die because they had no other options in life. And then it contrasted that horror with the complacency and moral bankruptcy of the rich people paying to watch it. Whereas what these program makers have taken from that incredible premise is just “that looks like a fun game show!”
Participation theatre. We are the art and the medium is the message. I like it.You can get the full effect by watching it wearing animal masks over a lavish takeaway.
I think the final 3 should have shared it.And we have a winner!
I’d have preferred Phil to have won it, but I didn’t dislike any of the three finalists. I do hope Mai does at the very least invite the other two to a fucking lavish dinner, if not give them 50k each, which wouldn’t make much of a dent on her winnings.
There’s a behind-the-scenes making of episode right after, by the way.
I kept thinking that if I were one of them I would certainly propose it. I doubt it’d be prohibited by the programme’s rules. I’d like to think the winner will give them something.I think the final 3 should have shared it.
I kept thinking that if I were one of them I would certainly propose it. I doubt it’d be prohibited by the programme’s rules. I’d like to think the winner will give them something.
But at the very least, unless they don’t want to play the media circus, I’m sure they’ll benefit financially via paid interviews and whatnot.
Ah! I had wondered about that specific thing.so was any attempt to solve induced disputes equitably, eg in the dalgona foursomes, where it seemed astonishing that the contestants didn’t allocate shapes swiftly through a couple of rounds of scissor-paper-stone, but it turns out that this was barred by the producers.