Well that's nonsense for a start - Combo isn't the only racist in the film, by any means. He's just the one that impacts on the group
Well yes you have the other fash - but they are perifaral characters and that still doesn't detract from my point that the only people with rascit attitudes are the violent freaks of the NF.
you think? in what way? although this film isn't supposed to be a 'depiction of the far right', the Frank Harper character and those scenes seemed to be pretty much as i expected..
They were more like the present day BNP - the NF then were pretty much openly neo-nazi - you'd have had a room full of skinheads sieg-hieling. They also didn't oppose the falklands war and would have had a far more coherent argument than what was put accross by combo. Its like we're not allowed to see why facism has an appeal or that they were (and still are) tapping into widely held fears, prejudices and concners - depicting as isolated loons is an insult to the intelligence of the audience.
Do you think? i thought he was just giving it a context, i wasn't expecting a history lesson or some all-embracing exposition on Thatcher's Britain. I was expecting what Meadows always delivers - human stories on a small scale.
But if you setting that context iy needs to serve more of a purpose than set dressing. The whole alienated youth and the attempts of the far right to expliot that only makes sense in the context of mass unemployment and the thatchers deveastration of industrial britian. Otherwise its just set dressing. Billy Elliot is simialrly flawed on this front. TBH it would have a much better film without the context.
compare with trainspotting - firmly and convincinly set in the 80s dole and drug culture yet definitely not a trot polemic.
so in your world nobody moves? Woody's girlfriend is from that part of the country, that's her own accent. Maybe Woody was from Burnley? fuck knows - that's a weird criticism. it's not Eddie Izzard doing hillbilly in the Riches, is it?
I think your making excuses here. If its supposed to be some urban working class area than you'd expect homogenous accents. Someone with a different accent would not be
that unusual - but it would be remarked upon. Its just seemed a bit lazy on the part of the film-maker.
As for your comment re: it seeming impro-ed. That's one of the film's - and Meadows' - strengths, IMO. Those kids seemed like they really were a gang, the banter and conversation was totally convincing, totally natural, the way the scenes were set up (the Milky and Combo scene took hours of really intense improvised work) was so realistic it made the film that much more compelling.
Its a technique which is great when it works - i.e. the scenes between Sean and Smell or the stuff about flairs (which was historically spot on as well!
).
However some of it didn't - like the touchy feely stuff between the gang members- and looked to me like poor youth drama impro.
Yes, the scene with milky and combo was convincingly performed - but it pissed me off as well - it was all about combo building up for his big violent outburst - explaining away his racism and violence as a result of his 'issues', rather than as a product of the social context he was living in - thus taking the politics out of the film and making it unchallenging and far more 'safe' for its audience (ditto the pussyfooting around the racist language) . Your essentailly told what to think and feel throughout the film - something that I can handle in me hollywood fluff but its not the mark of supposedly challenging and hard hitting drama.
Yeh, and it's a great film. It's also a very different film so i don't see why liking one would lead to criticising the other.
I think - still - you're criticising the film for not delivering on a promise it never made. You've watched it expecting it to be a certain type of film and you're criticising it on that basis.
I wasn't expecting a polemic, or a docu-drama, i was expecting a story about one young guy's experiences. And that's what I got.
Like I said it wasn't set up (or promoted) as that - from the title, to the poster to the opening montage.