Crispy
The following psytrance is baṉned: All
Loads of people go through to get to the park from Tulse Hill.That's what I thought as well. Never actually tried mind you.
Loads of people go through to get to the park from Tulse Hill.That's what I thought as well. Never actually tried mind you.
Thought so yeah.Loads of people go through to get to the park from Tulse Hill.
No gate. That's what you need for a gated community, you see. And it's not a "communal walkway terrace." It's only for people who live on that floor, and the key fobs were programmed to keep out residents from other floors. I've never been on any of the other walkways, unless I'm visiting someone and I have no access at all to the other half of the block. And of course there is no large communal courtyard. And no gate anywhere.Do you think the Barrier Block should not shut out the wider community from its south-facing communal walkway terraces? If not, what's the significant difference?
Loads of people go through to get to the park from Tulse Hill.
Do you think the Barrier Block should not shut out the wider community from its south-facing communal walkway terraces? If not, what's the significant difference?
By the way, Brockwell Gate isn't shut off is it? - maybe to cars, but you can walk through.
I also don't want to stir this up. But I think talk of keeping out the 'wider community' is inflammatory. It's a about controlling who has unfettered access and when.At the risk of stirring things up further, it seems to me that what's important is the intention behind the 'gated' aspect of a development. I think it's pretty clear with Brixton Square and Brockwell Gate that the intention is to shut out the wider community. And that's not a good thing in my book.
No gate. That's what you need for a gated community, you see. And it's not a "communal walkway terrace." It's only for people who live on that floor, and the key fobs were programmed to keep out residents from other floors. I've never been on any of the other walkways, unless I'm visiting someone and I have no access at all to the other half of the block. And of course there is no large communal courtyard. And no gate anywhere.
I hope that clears up that silly misunderstanding once and for all.
Spot on.I also don't want to stir this up. But I think talk of keeping out the 'wider community' is inflammatory. It's a about controlling who has unfettered access and when.
In terms of preventing integration with the local community, if a gated development has loads of its own facilities inside, such as a pub, restaurant, shops, cinema, gym, pool, whatever, as many do making them self sufficient, then of course it affects integration. People outside are prevented from accessing those, usually far superior, facilities and people inside wont use facilities outside the development. These types of places are widespread in the States, Africa, Middle East. But there is no comparison to what is being built in Brixton. The occupants of the buildings are as reliant as anyone else upon outside services and facilities available in the local community. They will drink and eat in pubs and restaurants. Shop in the same market or supermarkets. Go to the Ritzy or Whirled Cineama. Sign up at the Brockwell Lido or Rec. As for the 'wider community' being excluded from the courtyard : from the artist's impression it appears to be mostly raised beds and paths with a couple of benches. And it will be shaded most of the year because it is narrow and surrounded by tall buildings. I really don't think anyone is being excluded from anything important or worthwhile and no pubic rights of way or shortcuts have been lost. I'd go as far as to say, why would anyone want or need to be in there other than curiosity?
I was fascinated by Clifton Mansions for years - there was something exciting, mysterious and even romantic about that hidden courtyard with its artworks, such as the horse's head, mosaics, dim yellow lighting, etc.. I have no recollection of the gate being regularly left open for anyone to casually wander in and out. And the few times I asked people if I could come in and take a look I was told no and was reminded that it was people's homes and "how would you feel if someone was walking around in your front garden", blah blah blah. Which was disappointing but I never really thought it was all that unreasonable.
I put a lockable gate at the front of my house. I did it because I was tired of people wandering into the front garden and taking a piss, being woken by prostitutes shagging clients outside the window (once opening the front door whilst a girl was being shagged against it from beind), dealers, junkies shooting up or smoking pipes, often followed by taking a huge messy shit or, in one case, dry humping the stone paving at 5am screaming "I love you". [Ok the last one was quite amusing but quite frightening for the person downstairs.] Frankly, I can't think of any good reason for someone to be in my 6' front garden.
My Brixton Housing Coop neighbours have also had a locked gate put in for exactly the same reasons.
So whilst it might be nice for the place not to be gated - I think there is a reasonable practical reason why it is. The reason is the same reason that communal areas in a block have security. Pretending that it is something more sinister which reflects on the nature of the occupants is, I think, divisive.
"Affordable"....
Got the precise figures for this "substantial" amount and the costings for the "affordable" housing? Thanks.Let's not forget... A substantial amount of affordable housing will be included behind this infamous gate!
Let's not forget... A substantial amount of affordable housing will be included behind this infamous gate!
Got the precise figures for this "substantial" amount and the costings for the "affordable" housing? Thanks.
They're trying to reduce the amount of "affordable" housing they have to provide.
You guess. This is Lambeth - and I'm guessing that you haven't lived here very long if you guess that the council seriously considers the needs of people living here.<snip>But I guess the fact is was acceptable for Lambeth Council provides some comfort that the needs of the wider community have been appropriately considered...
The amount of affordable housing is a matter of public record - you can look at the Lambeth Council's planning website.
Haven't a clue about how much it will cost people who rent / buy it... But I guess the fact is was acceptable for Lambeth Council provides some comfort that the needs of the wider community have been appropriately considered...
Quite. And this is the real issue, not all the talk of gates, as has already been mentioned more than once.They're trying to reduce the amount of "affordable" housing they have to provide.
I put a lockable gate at the front of my house. I did it because I was tired of people wandering into the front garden and taking a piss, being woken by prostitutes shagging clients outside the window (once opening the front door whilst a girl was being shagged against it from beind), dealers, junkies shooting up or smoking pipes, often followed by taking a huge messy shit or, in one case, dry humping the stone paving at 5am screaming "I love you". [Ok the last one was quite amusing but quite frightening for the person downstairs.] Frankly, I can't think of any good reason for someone to be in my 6' front garden.
Ahahahahahahahaha! HAHAHA! HA!
No, the needs of the community have not been considered at all. The need for LC to line their pockets and schmooze with property developers has.