Buddy Bradley
Pantheistic solipsist
I'm 47, and have a workplace pension into which I currently pay the minimum allowance, and my employer does the same.
If I can afford to not need to touch the money for another 8 years, it seems to me that - compared to an ISA or other savings account - I would get far and away the most financial benefit from sticking as much of my salary as I can into my works pension plan. Since I can access it at 55, it's effectively just an 8-year-long inaccessible ISA with extra tax relief and reduced NI payments (at least as far as I am understanding things).
Is there anything wrong with this as a plan (aside from the usual risks of pension providers going sideways)?
If I can afford to not need to touch the money for another 8 years, it seems to me that - compared to an ISA or other savings account - I would get far and away the most financial benefit from sticking as much of my salary as I can into my works pension plan. Since I can access it at 55, it's effectively just an 8-year-long inaccessible ISA with extra tax relief and reduced NI payments (at least as far as I am understanding things).
Is there anything wrong with this as a plan (aside from the usual risks of pension providers going sideways)?