Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Reclaim Brixton movement - meetings and April 25th protest planned

Ok let me come and graffiti your wall. Let's see what happens. We can call it 'The Reclaim my wall theory' I await your reply.
Go right ahead - it's a council flat and the council will be delighted to charge you with criminal damage, which carries a hefty fine. Do try to make it non-racist and non-threatening (ie nothing which encourages hate crimes) graffiti, or it'll be prioritised for removal by the maintenance crew.
 
To be frank - I can't be arsed. However, I remember soon after I graduated from university, some friends of mine moved to Brixton and I used to spend a lot of time in the area, then I moved to Loughborough Junction three years later and also spent a lot of time in Brixton as a result. Over the course of that period 2007-2012 the area changed quite a bit. I was wondering whether this change is a rolling process that has been going on for some time or whether it is quite a sharp about-turn IYSWIM.

You can kind of date it into 3 (somewhat overlapping) blocks,to my way of thinking, which is the "Bohemian" (for want of a better all-round term) block of settlement where the squatters and the "arty types" colonised Brixton because it was cheap, cheerful and inclusive. You could roughly date this from the '70s until the mid-'90s, and it included people buying because you could still get "bang for buck" in terms of the number of bedrooms your money would buy, if you didn't mind some of the local peculiarities.
You then had a "mainstreaming" block, which you could date from the early '90s to around 2012, where Brixton became more of a mainstream housing destination for people not deterred by folk-myth and hysteria, where a lot of people bought or rented because it made financial sense to, and who came to love the local cultures. As with the previous block, this was fairly slow and steady, although it also saw the loss (to development) of several community assets such as Cooltan.
From roughly 2010-ish (would probably have been a little earlier but for das finanzkreis) gentrification has hyper-accelerated. rather than the "slow and steady" change of the previous two blocks - which although they displaced people, tended to displace to nearby locales - gentrification in Lambeth in general - and Brixton in particular - has been fast and brutal, with the local authority leading the way in that brutality with the clearance/eviction of short-life tenants from suddenly-valuable town-centre properties, and the minimisation of their obligations to those they displaced. Speculative buying of property is also a borough-wide (and city-wide) problem, as is the development of "luxury homes" for sale - it changes expectations and markets. What has also driven this is the realisation by various commercial entities of those changed expectations, and their attempts (as diverse as Lexadon's property rentals and Shrub & Shutter's cocktails in a jamjar) to cash in on it. Short-termist profit-making is triumphing over long-term community interests and needs - Brixton is being made over in the image of a group of people who have little interest in the place or the communities, only in the profits realisable, or the social capital accrued from living somewhere "edgy".

The above is a fairly well-simplified overview.
 
You can kind of date it into 3 (somewhat overlapping) blocks,to my way of thinking, which is the "Bohemian" (for want of a better all-round term) block of settlement where the squatters and the "arty types" colonised Brixton because it was cheap, cheerful and inclusive. You could roughly date this from the '70s until the mid-'90s, and it included people buying because you could still get "bang for buck" in terms of the number of bedrooms your money would buy, if you didn't mind some of the local peculiarities.
You then had a "mainstreaming" block, which you could date from the early '90s to around 2012, where Brixton became more of a mainstream housing destination for people not deterred by folk-myth and hysteria, where a lot of people bought or rented because it made financial sense to, and who came to love the local cultures. As with the previous block, this was fairly slow and steady, although it also saw the loss (to development) of several community assets such as Cooltan.
From roughly 2010-ish (would probably have been a little earlier but for das finanzkreis) gentrification has hyper-accelerated. rather than the "slow and steady" change of the previous two blocks - which although they displaced people, tended to displace to nearby locales - gentrification in Lambeth in general - and Brixton in particular - has been fast and brutal, with the local authority leading the way in that brutality with the clearance/eviction of short-life tenants from suddenly-valuable town-centre properties, and the minimisation of their obligations to those they displaced. Speculative buying of property is also a borough-wide (and city-wide) problem, as is the development of "luxury homes" for sale - it changes expectations and markets. What has also driven this is the realisation by various commercial entities of those changed expectations, and their attempts (as diverse as Lexadon's property rentals and Shrub & Shutter's cocktails in a jamjar) to cash in on it. Short-termist profit-making is triumphing over long-term community interests and needs - Brixton is being made over in the image of a group of people who have little interest in the place or the communities, only in the profits realisable, or the social capital accrued from living somewhere "edgy".

The above is a fairly well-simplified overview.
nice to see you keep it simple for Diamond
 
You can kind of date it into 3 (somewhat overlapping) blocks,to my way of thinking, which is the "Bohemian" (for want of a better all-round term) block of settlement where the squatters and the "arty types" colonised Brixton because it was cheap, cheerful and inclusive. You could roughly date this from the '70s until the mid-'90s, and it included people buying because you could still get "bang for buck" in terms of the number of bedrooms your money would buy, if you didn't mind some of the local peculiarities.
You then had a "mainstreaming" block, which you could date from the early '90s to around 2012, where Brixton became more of a mainstream housing destination for people not deterred by folk-myth and hysteria, where a lot of people bought or rented because it made financial sense to, and who came to love the local cultures. As with the previous block, this was fairly slow and steady, although it also saw the loss (to development) of several community assets such as Cooltan.
From roughly 2010-ish (would probably have been a little earlier but for das finanzkreis) gentrification has hyper-accelerated. rather than the "slow and steady" change of the previous two blocks - which although they displaced people, tended to displace to nearby locales - gentrification in Lambeth in general - and Brixton in particular - has been fast and brutal, with the local authority leading the way in that brutality with the clearance/eviction of short-life tenants from suddenly-valuable town-centre properties, and the minimisation of their obligations to those they displaced. Speculative buying of property is also a borough-wide (and city-wide) problem, as is the development of "luxury homes" for sale - it changes expectations and markets. What has also driven this is the realisation by various commercial entities of those changed expectations, and their attempts (as diverse as Lexadon's property rentals and Shrub & Shutter's cocktails in a jamjar) to cash in on it. Short-termist profit-making is triumphing over long-term community interests and needs - Brixton is being made over in the image of a group of people who have little interest in the place or the communities, only in the profits realisable, or the social capital accrued from living somewhere "edgy".

The above is a fairly well-simplified overview.

Interesting. That periodisation was broadly my impression too but not having lived in the area, I couldn't really comment with certainty. One thing that does strike me though is the causal link between people moving in to the area and the area developing places like this champagne and cheese shop. Presumably there's a kind of positive feedback loop going on there but I don't think a champagne and cheese shop would have a punt without knowing it had a target market to begin with.
 
And it is funny to see Violent Panda and Pickman's patting each others' backs...

Personally, I've got nothing on today at work, hence my presence on these boards but you chaps must have nothing on ever to form such a constant clique...
 
That's a very good synopsis. Personally though I don't think that what you describe as the third wave (2010-) and what is happening now as gentrification. My understanding of gentrification (as defined by urban geographers) is what you describe very well pre-2010. Now it's more about hyper privatisation, asset acquisition; unfettered capitalism in essence.
 
That's a very good synopsis. Personally though I don't think that what you describe as the third wave (2010-) and what is happening now as gentrification. My understanding of gentrification (as defined by urban geographers) is what you describe very well pre-2010. Now it's more about hyper privatisation, asset acquisition; unfettered capitalism in essence.

What is interesting, to my mind anyways, is when you see pictures of Brixton in the Victorian/Edwardian era when it appears to have been a wealthy, middle-class suburb.
 
<snip> Personally, I've got nothing on today at work, hence my presence on these boards but you chaps must have nothing on ever to form such a constant clique...
Do give it a rest, there's a good chap. It's less a clique than a truce. FYI VP is longterm sick and disabled. And I'm his carer, hence my amount of time spent on urban, except when out doing my bit for this estate (as I was this morning), combined with a bit of advocacy and outreach.

Do you have any more jibes you want to get in, you sad little man?
 
Do give it a rest, there's a good chap. It's less a clique than a truce. FYI VP is longterm sick and disabled. And I'm his carer, hence my amount of time spent on urban, except when out doing my bit for this estate (as I was this morning), combined with a bit of advocacy and outreach.

Do you have any more jibes you want to get in, you sad little man?

If someone gives me abuse on a bulletin board, they can expect it back in equal amounts, regardless of their personal situation.
 
From roughly 2010-ish (would probably have been a little earlier but for das finanzkreis) gentrification has hyper-accelerated.

More stats:

During the last year, sold prices in New Addington were 22% up on the previous year and 26% up on 2008 when the average house price was £193,522.

Overall sold prices in Peckham over the last year were 12% up on the previous year and 28% up on the 2012 level of £320,825.


Overall sold prices in Catford over the last year were 19% up on the previous year and 31% up on the 2012 level of £249,085.

Just to support your observation - it's happening all over, even Catford! :D

A common stat appears to be a 25/30% rise in property prices over the last couple of years. Why is this? What happened in 2012 to spark this explosion in prices?
 
<snip> A common stat appears to be a 25/30% rise in property prices over the last couple of years. Why is this? What happened in 2012 to spark this explosion in prices?
The Olympics, social cleansing (carting off a lot of beggars and rough sleepers, and very actively dissuading their return) and the publicity surrounding it. :(
 
That's a very good synopsis. Personally though I don't think that what you describe as the third wave (2010-) and what is happening now as gentrification. My understanding of gentrification (as defined by urban geographers) is what you describe very well pre-2010. Now it's more about hyper privatisation, asset acquisition; unfettered capitalism in essence.
I agree that it's not gentrification as we came to understand it, or to deploy the term in general use. The only reason I still use it is because I see what's happening as an extension and acceleration of traditional gentrification into neoliberalism engraved into a community - commodification of the public space of community into saleable chunks.
 
What is interesting, to my mind anyways, is when you see pictures of Brixton in the Victorian/Edwardian era when it appears to have been a wealthy, middle-class suburb.

That's generally because most of the pictures that make it into mass circulation are those showing main thoroughfares or showing roads of houses soon after they were built - stuff like Water Lane, Tulse Hill and Herne Hill rather than the smaller back-streets where the working class lived.
 
More stats:

During the last year, sold prices in New Addington were 22% up on the previous year and 26% up on 2008 when the average house price was £193,522.

Overall sold prices in Peckham over the last year were 12% up on the previous year and 28% up on the 2012 level of £320,825.


Overall sold prices in Catford over the last year were 19% up on the previous year and 31% up on the 2012 level of £249,085.

Just to support your observation - it's happening all over, even Catford! :D

Sure, absolutely.
Now check out volume turnover by area. We're in the upper reaches for Greater London, if Land Registry stats are to be believed. In other words, we're currently being colonised more heavily than Catford, Peckham or (hawk, spit) New Addington.

A common stat appears to be a 25/30% rise in property prices over the last couple of years. Why is this? What happened in 2012 to spark this explosion in prices?

From about 2010 until 2012, property development in Greater London went into overdrive, mostly on the basis of either seeking an Olympic premium, or using the Olympics as a "window" through which to project London property as a good investment opportunity - especially as prices are tied to the govts' reluctance to deflate the property price bubble.
 
Sure, absolutely.
Now check out volume turnover by area. We're in the upper reaches for Greater London, if Land Registry stats are to be believed. In other words, we're currently being colonised more heavily than Catford, Peckham or (hawk, spit) New Addington.


A common stat appears to be a 25/30% rise in property prices over the last couple of years. Why is this? What happened in 2012 to spark this explosion in prices?
oi, less of the shit about New Addington. Thought better of you than that
 
oi, less of the shit about New Addington. Thought better of you than that

Sorry, had a bad experience there two thirds of a lifetime ago that set me against it. It came to represent my idea of what a community would be like if it were populated with "just minding my own business, don't want to get involved" types (which I realise probably isn't an accurate assessment of the place or its' people).
 
Sorry, had a bad experience there two thirds of a lifetime ago that set me against it. It came to represent my idea of what a community would be like if it were populated with "just minding my own business, don't want to get involved" types (which I realise probably isn't an accurate assessment of the place or its' people).
No, it's pretty much like Thamesmead, where the council used to house families that they thought were problems
 
You can kind of date it into 3 (somewhat overlapping) blocks,to my way of thinking, which is the "Bohemian" (for want of a better all-round term) block of settlement where the squatters and the "arty types" colonised Brixton because it was cheap, cheerful and inclusive. You could roughly date this from the '70s until the mid-'90s, and it included people buying because you could still get "bang for buck" in terms of the number of bedrooms your money would buy, if you didn't mind some of the local peculiarities.
You then had a "mainstreaming" block, which you could date from the early '90s to around 2012, where Brixton became more of a mainstream housing destination for people not deterred by folk-myth and hysteria, where a lot of people bought or rented because it made financial sense to, and who came to love the local cultures. As with the previous block, this was fairly slow and steady, although it also saw the loss (to development) of several community assets such as Cooltan.
From roughly 2010-ish (would probably have been a little earlier but for das finanzkreis) gentrification has hyper-accelerated. rather than the "slow and steady" change of the previous two blocks - which although they displaced people, tended to displace to nearby locales - gentrification in Lambeth in general - and Brixton in particular - has been fast and brutal, with the local authority leading the way in that brutality with the clearance/eviction of short-life tenants from suddenly-valuable town-centre properties, and the minimisation of their obligations to those they displaced. Speculative buying of property is also a borough-wide (and city-wide) problem, as is the development of "luxury homes" for sale - it changes expectations and markets. What has also driven this is the realisation by various commercial entities of those changed expectations, and their attempts (as diverse as Lexadon's property rentals and Shrub & Shutter's cocktails in a jamjar) to cash in on it. Short-termist profit-making is triumphing over long-term community interests and needs - Brixton is being made over in the image of a group of people who have little interest in the place or the communities, only in the profits realisable, or the social capital accrued from living somewhere "edgy".

The above is a fairly well-simplified overview.
Sounds about right but I'm interested to hear what you think the area of Brixton was like in the 20s 30s etc. Was it gentrifide then?
 
Sounds about right but I'm interested to hear what you think the area of Brixton was like in the 20s 30s etc. Was it gentrifide then?
Does it matter in the context of this thread?

If you're that interested in Brixton history there's a dedicated thread on it.
 
Back
Top Bottom