Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Rangers 2011/2012.

Perfectly good goal not given, 3 handballs in the area not given. We are up against it again. The 2 penalties we did get should not prove we get all the calls our way. Great to see Ness playing.
 
Perfectly good goal not given, 3 handballs in the area not given. We are up against it again. The 2 penalties we did get should not prove we get all the calls our way. Great to see Ness playing.

Neither of the penalties you got should have been given. 2 handballs in the first half certainly. The cross that jellyfish headed and Tokely's handball.
 
Rangers denied 3 other penalties and a good goal not given, but all the talk is of 2 penalties given which were soft. The agenda is the same every year.
 
It wasn't a perfectly good goal. Should have had at least one penalty in the first half (I've only seen the one handball so can't comment on the others), but Naismith is ridiculous for throwing himself to the ground. The two penalties you got weren't soft, they just weren't penalties at all.
 
Rangers denied 3 other penalties and a good goal not given, but all the talk is of 2 penalties given which were soft. The agenda is the same every year.

Yep, your agenda is the same every every year. The other three penalties would have been soft if given.
 
Because Jelavic was onside when the original ball was played, but he was not when Edu played it. You really should look again at the laws of the game if you have to ask that question.
 
jelavicoffside.jpg

He's closer to the goal-line than the right back (although I'll give you not by much), ergo he's offside. Looking at the penalty incidents shown in the highlights again, none of them were intentional, so no, they weren't penalties either.

But you can prove anything with facts can't you?
 
Edu, onside hits the ball which then hits off jela goes in not given and it's all the fault of Edu being onside.:rolleyes: The right back is not running as fast as Jela or Edu as the ball is by him. If that had been against shame fc the officials would have had to come out and say sorry for not giving the goal. Same shit ,different season.
 
Oh ffs!

The fact that Edu is onside is irrelevant. As is the speed of the ICT right back.

Jelavic, who played the ball into the net, was offside.

Therefore, it isn't a goal.

I can see now why you have difficulty accepting that the officials aren't all against you. It was much easier when that lovely Richard Gough officiated matches for you wasn't it?

edited to clarify: Had Edu not played the ball at all, then it would've been a goal as Jelavic was onside when the cross first came in. Unfortunately for you, when Edu touches the ball Jelavic is in an offside position.
 
3 games in & youre playing the victim card already.

Years of intimidation from shame fc have made refs scared to give anything to us ,as they know the mhedia and shame fc mouth pieces will be on the war path about it and try and get them sacked. Last season should have been a wake up call to anyone who thought it was a level playing field in scotland.
 
Years of intimidation from shame fc have made refs scared to give anything to us ,as they know the mhedia and shame fc mouth pieces will be on the war path about it and try and get them sacked. Last season should have been a wake up call to anyone who thought it was a level playing field in scotland.

Anything to say about these then?
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/...linesman-over-offside-blunder-86908-20891037/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13138639.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/d/dundee_utd/9100210.stm ("Dougie couldn't get his finger to the spot quickly enough. It's not the first he has given against us,")
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/aberdeenfc/Jim-Jefferies-bemoans-referee39s-denial.6725199.jp

The rest of us have known for years that the playing field is as level as the old Easter Road pitch. But not in the way you claim.
 
Have you read any of them? The first one shows there are double standards against us. The other ones are obvious.
Last year shame fc broke the British record for penalties after their constant moaning.
 
Have you read any of them? The first one shows there are double standards against us. The other ones are obvious.
Last year shame fc broke the British record for penalties after their constant moaning.

How many of the penalties do you think were wrongly given? And if you please, back it up with facts, not frothing at the mouth.
 
How many of the penalties do you think were wrongly given? And if you please, back it up with facts, not frothing at the mouth.

How many would have been given if shame fc hadn't made a climate of fear for refs. They got more penalties than any other team in Britain. That is a fact. As for frothing at the mouth I leave that to the haters like yourself.
 
Back
Top Bottom