Oh yes the iPad is a great camera. I was trying to take some photographs the other day and someone else was holding up a great big iPad occupying a lot of space. "Great" I thought.By this definition, the greatest camera of all time is the iPad.
Oh yes the iPad is a great camera. I was trying to take some photographs the other day and someone else was holding up a great big iPad occupying a lot of space. "Great" I thought.By this definition, the greatest camera of all time is the iPad.
What can one say about photographic quality when the image has been made for all intents and purposes, by a computer?
Are these quality photos?
They are also referred to as mirrorless cameras you muppet!Yes, most sane people (and camera retailers) refer to them as "compact system cameras". The "mirrorless" bit is a no-brainer, given that the cameras aren't SLRs.
Yes, that is one good reason to take one off.Having just read the OP and first page, I'd also like to add that lens hoods can block the throw of a flash, causing dark areas at the bottom of images.
Yes, that is one good reason to take one off.
Produce ONE QUOTE from any one of this "bunch of people" making such a claim, please. Thanks.What I got back was a bunch of people trying to argue that a phone can do everything a DSLR can
Please do this Bungle73. We're all waiting expectantly.Produce ONE QUOTE from any one of this "bunch of people" making such a claim, please. Thanks.
Gosh, that would be convenient if you haven't got a bag or big pockets, wouldn't it?Or turn it backward...... for storage purposes
Or turn it backward...... for storage purposes
Go and read your own posts. It's what you've been arguing with me about for the past 28 pages. I say "DSLRs can do X", you say "Phone cameras can do X too".Produce ONE QUOTE from any one of this "bunch of people" making such a claim, please. Thanks.
A QUOTE please Bungle73.Go and read your own posts. It's what you've been arguing with me about for the past 28 pages. I say "DSLRs can do X", you say "Phone cameras can do X too".
Oh, and thanks for that one, I missed out Ed trying to make out he hasn't been arguing something he very well has been arguing.
That is all.
I know exactly what I've posted, but you claimed that there's been "a bunch of people trying to argue that a phone can do everything a DSLR can."Go and read your own posts. It's what you've been arguing with me about for the past 28 pages. I say "DSLRs can do X", you say "Phone cameras can do X too".
Oh, and thanks for that one, I missed out Ed trying to make out he hasn't been arguing something he very well has been arguing.
That is all.
Tell me what you were and the others were arguing in this thread? Can you do that now?I know exactly what I've posted, but you claimed that there's been "a bunch of people trying to argue that a phone can do everything a DSLR can."
I'm now asking you to name those people and to produce some quotes that back up your assertion. A simple enough request, you'd think.
Can you do that now?
You don't think he is lying do you? I had it figured that he was just not reading and understanding what people had written. If he is lying then that makes him a troll, and you know what we do to trolls. Oh dear.A QUOTE please Bungle73.
Otherwise it starts to look like you're lying, and you've already said how much you dislike that.
Come on. You've made a bold claim about what a "bunch of people" were supposedly saying, so why don't you toddle along and produce some quotes to back it up?Tell me what you were and the others were arguing in this thread? Can you do that now?
It is, sadly, starting to look that wayYou don't think he is lying do you? I had it figured that he was just not reading and understanding what people had written. If he is lying then that makes him a troll, and you know what we do to trolls. Oh dear.
I really don't think I can bothered with this thread any longer.
blah
blah
blah
I'm out.
Oh, so you can't. Because you know full well what you've been saying, as do I.Come on. You've made a bold claim about what a "bunch of people" were supposedly doing, so why don't you toddle along and produce some quote to back it up?
You don't think he is lying do you? I had it figured that he was just not reading and understanding what people had written. If he is lying then that makes him a troll, and you know what we do to trolls. Oh dear.
Yep, I know what I've been saying, but you've made claims about what a whole bunch of people hare have supposedly been saying here.Oh, so you can't. Because you know full well what you've been saying, as do I.
We have yet to get a conviction or confession for these sins. Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition. And while I am slaving at a hot keyboard well done Dr Herbz on the "toys out of the pram" image.What would be the appropriate punishment for this thread about lens hoods?
How ironic that was actually you that started this discussion off, with this litter gem:It is, sadly, starting to look that way
Can you provide a quote Bungle73? Or are you a liar?
I don't see the point in fancy cameras with optical lenses these days. My phone is 26 megapixels with a x30 zoom.
We have yet to get a conviction or confession for these sins. Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition. And while I am slaving at a hot keyboard well done Dr Herbz on the "toys out of the pram" image.
Oh dear. You're a bit... 'literal' aren't you?How ironic that was actually you that started this discussion off, with this litter gem:
A phone doesn't come anywhere near to equalling the quality of even a budget DSLR, no matter how many megapixels it's got
You really haven't much of a clue when it comes to photography because this a statement from Planet Idiot. That is all.
Those context-stripped quotes have no correlation to the claims you're making.How about this?