Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Palm: Pre, webOS & app discussion

I like the idea they could license WebOS, something they should have done that straight away. With Android slow but now rapid take up there was some desperation in the ranks to take on the iPhone.

Android is nothing to WebOS
 
I like the idea they could license WebOS, something they should have done that straight away. With Android slow but now rapid take up there was some desperation in the ranks to take on the iPhone.

Android is nothing to WebOS

You sure you dont mean the Android interface is nothing to the WebOS interface?

WebOS is essentially WebKit on linux.
 
You sure you dont mean the Android interface is nothing to the WebOS interface?

WebOS is essentially WebKit on linux.
You make it sound like it's been slapped together in half an hour when in fact it's pretty much recognised as the best mobile OS out there.

It's certainly the best I've ever used.
 
You make it sound like it's been slapped together in half an hour when in fact it's pretty much recognised as the best mobile OS out there.

It's certainly the best I've ever used.

Not at all, its just down to the architecture. WebOS is essentially a visual layer on top of a regular linux kernal. The bottom layers are pretty generic, its the user interface that's put on top of it that makes it magic. So its easy to put it on top of something else. If someone does buy them, I hope its RIM. They have the good hardware that fits the WebOS concept and an interface that by their own admission is not really up to much.
 
Not at all, its just down to the architecture. WebOS is essentially a visual layer on top of a regular linux kernal. The bottom layers are pretty generic, its the user interface that's put on top of it that makes it magic. So its easy to put it on top of something else. If someone does buy them, I hope its RIM. They have the good hardware that fits the WebOS concept and an interface that by their own admission is not really up to much.

They might make a consumer version or just keep Palm.

Blackberries are part of a larger system for employees of large companies. The blackberry OS has full end to end encryption of all its data, one of its key marketing points.

That is something that cannot be shoehorned into an OS it has to be built in from the very start.
 
They might make a consumer version or just keep Palm.

Blackberries are part of a larger system for employees of large companies. The blackberry OS has full end to end encryption of all its data, one of its key marketing points.

That is something that cannot be shoehorned into an OS it has to be built in from the very start.

Its not a trivial job to do it, but with that particular combination its the least messy.
 
The Preware package manager is ace, provides easy access to all the available app stores and configuration patches which add some really nice functionality to the phone. Essential IMO.
 
There's so much to like about Palm, but the company just aren't too interested in the UK.
I'm *still* waiting their promised response to my article from February.
 
I doubt it...why by Palm and service it's considerable debts when Android exists already and is backed by Google? Makes no sense for Dell, or RIM or just about anyone else.
 
I doubt it...why by Palm and service it's considerable debts when Android exists already and is backed by Google? Makes no sense for Dell, or RIM or just about anyone else.

Exactly, I'm not sure if people are willing to spend 500 odd million quid for a few patents.
 
I don't see that as being a very good fit.

HP don't make smart phones for any sector so aren't even a player. Are they trying to take on the world with a failed platform?
 
Oh yeah so they do, the iPaq was a compaq brand.

That set the world alight.

Clearly they can make some nice hardware, but they are very stern and business focused company. That's where they made all their money.

Consumer's orientated stuff always seem a bit of an afterthought with HP
 
Oh yeah so they do, the iPaq was a compaq brand.

That set the world alight.

Never used one, assume its just another me to winmo device (although I think it may have been one of the first "pocket pc's)

It would make sense to buy another company who are better at it then they are. Only time will tell I guess.
 
It's not as bad as it could be i guess; HP are a huge company, with their tentacles in pretty much all areas of IT. Rather them than someone like Dell.

Whether they've really the focus and skills is another matter. Neither Palm or HP have ever really set the world alight with handset design in the past. Good OS, but there's a hell of a lot of work to do.
 
WebOS despite some serious press praise and actually being pretty good, failed.

I can't see how HP can remove the stranglehold that Apple and its App's have. HP have never produced anything as consumer focused as the iPhone and iTunes. Their laptops might be sold to the public, but it seems that no matter how hard HP try, cant quite get away from being a corporate company.
 
WebOS despite some serious press praise and actually being pretty good, failed.

I can't see how HP can remove the stranglehold that Apple and its App's have. HP have never produced anything as consumer focused as the iPhone and iTunes. Their laptops might be sold to the public, but it seems that no matter how hard HP try, cant quite get away from being a corporate company.

Price Differentiation? If they can provide devices of a similar spec, make them "free" on contract and market them well that could give them advantage. The last part will probably prove hardest. TBH I'd say their biggest competition won't be from apple, but from the many android devices that will be released before they get any new hardware out.

If they can make sure they hit all the networks, that would be a massive step up as well.
 
HTC would have been a terrible partner.

They are a huge Taiwanese company that have made a name for themselves making other people stuff. In recent years they have made a further name for themselves copying the best bits of other peoples phones.
 
Webos will make a great tablet OS, battery life is my only qualm with my pre, functionally its superb.

Looks like you may be right

The word is that Palm's existing hardware roadmap is basically untouched at this point by this acquisition, but the good news on the HP end of things is that the company sees webOS as a "prized asset," and they intend to "scale it across multiple connected devices." That sounds like tablets to us, and HP didn't beat back that assumption.

Engadget
 
I think that its wait and see.

I am assuming they are going to be keeping Palm as an entity. Consuming it into HP will lose the creative talents that made WebOS. Just need to underpin their hardware division with some extra industrial quality, sadly lacking in the Pre by all accounts.
 
As an ex HP employee, this really makes me sad, they are going to fuck it up. Its the most ridiculous company I've ever had the misfortune working for.
 
Too early to call but HP doesn't seem a great fit. HP's very problem is its size and reach into all sorts of things. I does good printers, but so it should. After that the company is a mish-mash of conflicting ideas...christ they spend tens of millions a year on a copywriting agency to try understand what they do internally.
 
Back
Top Bottom