In these situations, having a positive and practical alternative can help - rather than coming across as nay-sayers / Luddites.
Accepting the reality that change is coming, and that NR are a commercially driven organisation (
whatever I might think about that ideologically or morally), if I were an existing leaseholder wanting to ensure business continuity, it would seem that a few relatively simple moves might make things better:
1/ Consultation (moderated by Lambeth? Local Chamber of Commerce?) before plans are drawn up, so that the mix of unit sizes proposed is a good fit (some businesses may want more space, some less - there may be potential for building in the micro-shops that inhabit the corners of the arches). If all the businesses would use a single law firm to represent them in these discussions, this would be better value and ensure that 'divide and rule' was not a viable strategy for NR.
2/ Negotiations (including realistic discussions about rent rises and other lease conditions) that make it possible for some units to be 'pre-let' - the businesses paying a deposit to confirm their intentions.
3/ Phased working, so that the units occupied by businesses which won't be returning are re-developed first, allowing businesses that are staying to re-locate without loss of continuity.
Amazingly, that seems to be enough - could be a win-win for all concerned:
- Central Brixton Project gets some tidying up and some shiny new units
- Politicians get to say that they brokered a good deal for the community
- Businesses that are part of the fabric of Brixton get to stay - hopefully strengthened by improved environment.
- Network Rail gets guaranteed rents up-front for some of the units - no 'voids' while they are being marketed - better cash-flow.
- Network Rail gets good corporate PR
- Network Rail gets to amalgamate the units that are not booked by exiting uses to make the larger spaces they want for renting on the open market.
- And we get to keep the shops and services we support.
Any thoughts? Of course, I may have missed out something important.
I'm an architect. If some people with other relevant skills were to offer their time, perhaps we could offer business owners a session to talk these sort of ideas through with the aim of developing an alternative proposal that has sound foundations that could gather broad support?