Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Nutritional "advice" entering the Twilight Zone?

Give me generic soy every time.
I may start making my own in retirement.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
 
I suppose it might if you only eat the fat off meat :hmm:
A quick Google suggests that broccoli does indeed contain quite a lot of protein but most of it is not usable to humans and you would have to eat a fuck ton of it to get the same amount of essential amino acids that you would get from eating a nice steak. So again, there is a kernal of truth but it is not the whole truth.
 
A quick Google suggests that broccoli does indeed contain quite a lot of protein but most of it is not usable to humans and you would have to eat a fuck ton of it to get the same amount of essential amino acids that you would get from eating a nice steak. So again, there is a kernal of truth but it is not the whole truth.

Oh yeah I wasn't suggesting that was anything other than batshit! :D
 
Actually it may be a mere 80 percent in broccoli.
Protein is seriously over-rated.

I eat a broccoli-based diet - one head / 300g, 4 "portions" every day - as well as a lot more veggies...
 
Broccoli contains more protein per calorie than steak

According the Dr. Furhman’s book, Eat to Live, a 100-calorie portion of sirloin steak has 5.4 grams of protein, and a 100-calorie portion of broccoli has 11.2 grams of protein. This is rubbish. According to the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service’s Nutrient Data Laboratory database, 100 calories of broiled beef, top sirloin steak has exactly 11.08 grams of protein and 100 calories of chopped, raw broccoli has exactly 8.29. I’m not sure what universe Dr. Furhman lives in, but in my universe, 8.29 is less than 11.08.

“Broccoli has more protein than steak”—and other crap
 
I do not doubt that broccoli contains protein and lots of good stuff. I take issue with the statement "broccoli contains more protein than steak" because it is not true and it leads people to think that they can get all their protein needs from a few florets.
 
I do not doubt that broccoli contains protein and lots of good stuff. I take issue with the statement "broccoli contains more protein than steak" because it is not true and it leads people to think that they can get all their protein needs from a few florets.
What people like Joel Fuhrmann are trying to get across is that it's nigh-on impossible to be protein deficient if you are maintaining your calorific balance. (unless you live on doughnuts)
 
What people like Joel Fuhrmann are trying to get across is that it's nigh-on impossible to be protein deficient if you are maintaining your calorific balance. (unless you live on doughnuts)
Fair enough but he is quoting incorrect data so it's difficult to take him seriously IMO.
 
Protein broccoli vs steak: is dr. F wrong???

www.facebook.com/drfuhrman/posts/101
54
079449535360


On Google search and Wikipedia the protein content of broccoli per 100 calories is far less than steak.

Joel Fuhrman, M.D. There is no error or fantasy numbers in my book. People look for any silly reason to deny the reality that you have to eat healthfully to be healthy. The data we used was from a listed cut of meat with 1/4 inch fat edge, which was the way the government reported it back then when the book was written years ago, now the government analysis site and more reference works use 1/8 inch of fat around it. So the numbers can vary based on what cut of steak is used in the comparison. Individuals and commercial hamburgers do blend this fat right in and do not trim it all off, so this is not even inaccurate today. This is all just a smoke screen to attack me because some people would prefer to reject my message. If a person was impartial and a scientific thinker, they would not reject my recommendations because they found steak (with more fat trimmed) is higher in protein then was listed. The argument is not based on this one fact. The bottom line is that broccoli has plenty of protein, as does all greens, beans and seeds, and when we eat them in copious amounts we get sufficient protein. I never said your entire diet should be broccoli or other greens. And, I never make up numbers, I just report them as carefully as possible. That does not mean I can never make an inadvertent error but that would not change the message of eating high nutrient plant foods and restricting animal protein and high glycemic carbohydrates to prevent cancer.
 
His explanation makes me doubt his authenticity. He goes to great pains to justify his figures, whilst simultaneously highlighting how easy it is for figures to be misinterpreted. His message appears to be both a generic one of "eat more veg, less meat", combined with a "here's the exact numbers to back up the argument" approach. This is schizophrenic & dilutes the message. He should just stick to the "eat more veg, less meat" angle & not bother trying to prove it to the nth degree. As soon as you say "X is better than Y by Z percent" you open yourself up to scrutiny & the vagaries of subtly conflicting analysis based on the inaccuracy inherent in such matters. Eat more veg, less meat, end of story. We all know that's true, no need to bang the drum about precise figures.
 
Nothing wrong with checking once in a while.
It's especially easy for me because I prefer to eat the same food every day.
Surely one's health is worth a similar amount of effort to that which one might devote to one's finances for example ?

And as for "nothing is bad" ..... :hmm:
 
Do vitamin pills work or not? Assuming you eat enough fibre and not too much saturated fat. Work in terms of providing nutrients.
 
Back
Top Bottom