Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Notice served and Dulwich Hamlet locked out of ground

But given that it is us who are on fire in this situation, would you let them help put us out (by pissing or otherwise)?
They can support it, but both politically and to me personally they are a TOTAL irrelevance.
Tell you what, seeing as it's us who are on fire in this situation...let's get UKIP on board as well, eh?
I hold the Greens in as much contempt as the Greens to be honest. Can't stand either of those pursuasions.
 
Latest:

Council have made an offer, Meadow still haven't acknowledged receipt of it.
Doesn't surprise me. Typical arrogance and no class whatsoever. Any idea of the possible timeframe for initiating CPO procedure now Meadow are simply refusing to enter into any dialogue?
 
Doesn't surprise me. Typical arrogance and no class whatsoever. Any idea of the possible timeframe for initiating CPO procedure now Meadow are simply refusing to enter into any dialogue?

Given the profile of this specifically, I'd say 2 years for a CPO from last month.
 
And in the Spanish media (auto translation)

Dulwich Hamlet FC, the example of English football

The historic club in south-east London has recently seen Meadow, the company that ran the club and owns its stadium, expelled them from their home and even banned the use of their own name. However, the fight of its fans and the support of local politicians could unleash a government action focused on protecting clubs from their owners.
By Juan Corellano | 02/04/2018 DULWICH HAMLET

Dulwich Hamlet FC, famous in the UK despite being a semi-professional and one of the oldest clubs in the country, celebrates its 125th anniversary this year. It should be a year dedicated to the celebration of the feat that involves completing a century and a quarter of history in a world as volatile as it is sometimes the football. However, it is rather a stage to forget. In this case, the team's sporting performance is the least important, because what is in suspense is the existence of this football club that until now had been tremendously long-lived. The Dulwich Hamlet is a club whose greatest value, for which it is known in the country, does not reside in its actions on the lawn, but in its involvement in charitable causes and community work.

It all started with the arrival of a new investor outside the club, something that sadly is usually a common denominator in similar cases of clubs taken to bankruptcy. This was the case of Meadow Partners, an American construction company that became the new owner of the grounds of the club's stadium, Champion Hill, and managed its finances in 2014. The arrival came about due to the severe financial problems Dulwich was at that time. The new owners landed with real estate plans for the acquired land outside the team and the promise to help the club with its debts and in the construction of a new stadium in the area caused that the initial support of the fans was won.

However, these plans were stopped by several urban problems. First, his proposal, which included the construction of 155 homes, did not meet the municipal requirement of having at least 35% of properties at an affordable price for people with lower incomes. In addition, the lands, qualified as Metropolitan Open Land, are the most technically protected in the London area. As a result of this, his proposal was rejected by the authorities. After this setback, the company decided to withdraw from the management of the team's finances, which were returned to the hands of fans, and went on to own only the field and its grounds. Due to a high rate of seasonal economic losses caused by poor management, Meadow left the club with a significant increase in debt as a legacy. This went from a relatively manageable figure of 150,000 pounds in 2014 before his arrival, to the 700,000 that the club owes today. This economic hole, in addition to having increased, in many cases is of unknown origin due to the opacity of Meadow's management. In short, the club was forced to face completely unaffordable payments for a team led by its fans through a commission of volunteers.

Even with everything, this was not the end of the penance of Dulwich Hamlet. Meadow decided last March 5 to evict without warning the team of the land that had been the home of the club for more than 75 years. Since then, the club plays temporarily their home games in the field of Tooting & Mitcham United FC, a local rival that has welcomed them in a disinterested manner. When it seemed impossible, the story took a new turn and Meadow decided to register the names of 'Dulwich Hamlet FC' and 'The Hamlet' and the initials 'DHFC', as well as prohibiting the club and its fans from using it. «When they registered in name we just laughed. We have received legal advice and they have told us that they can not do that, the name is and has been ours for 125 years, they can not just register it now. It was really stupid on his part and, above all, on his legal team, "says Duncan Hart, former president of the Supporters Trust and member of the Save Dulwich Hamlet platform. The latter is an organization that recently emerged as a coalition of amateur groups whose goal is to bring together the efforts of these in the task that is most urgent at this time: save the team from the disappearance.

However dramatic and special the recent history of Dulwich Hamlet is, it is, however, much more common than it seems in the United Kingdom, as many clubs of different levels are facing situations close to disappearance for similar causes. The case of Dulwich has had special repercussion in the media, because it is a club that, despite not competing at a professional level, is well known both for its history and its activity outside the field. Many British clubs are rooted in the community to which they belong and contribute a social value that is often overlooked, such as helping people to integrate and feel part of that community, collecting money for different charitable causes, offering entertainment. for the younger ones, etc. In particular, Dulwich is known to be very active in this facet. «We have organized food banks for the most needy, we were one of the first clubs that supported causes against homophobia, we have collected funds for the refugee crisis ... we have proven to be there, open to anyone who wants to come » Hart.

Precisely this work has made the influx of the public has grown from about 200 fans in 2010 to around 1500, the largest difference in the category. "People come to us because of the things we do for the community. This is not just a few guys kicking a ball on a Saturday at three in the afternoon, it's much more and that's precisely why Dulwich Hamlet should survive, " says Hart.

"People come to us because of the things we do for the community. This is not just a few guys kicking a ball on a Saturday at three in the afternoon. "

This notoriety has led them to receive support from public figures and figures, such as the mayor of London Sadiq Khan, Labor leader Jeremy Corbyn or former Manchester United soccer player Rio Ferdinand. The latter is a creative partner of the Legacy Foundation that he owns with Mark Noble and Bobby Zamora, whose objective is to build affordable housing for people with low incomes. Precisely through this society they made an offer to Meadow to buy the land for 10 million pounds. The plans presented by this company are in the interest of the club, the fans and the community, as they would be more beneficial for all, however, the American company has not accepted the offer, so that its progress is still pending and the future of the club uncertain. «The only thing I tell Meadow is that it's time to go. You have ten million on the table, you put seven so you can still make a profit, why do not you accept them and leave? You are no longer welcome in our club or London, "says Hart.

Within this support received, the representative of the Parliament of the Dulwich & West Norwood Helen Hayes region was especially important. On March 16, she brought this issue to the British Parliament affirming in her speech that " the situation in Dulwich is not isolated, it is representative of a much broader problem in which the short-term financial benefit seeks to assert itself on an institution valued not only in pounds and pennies, but in people, friendship, aspiration and history» Hayes's argument was answered by the Government's appointment of a neutral intermediary to try to bring the Dulwich case to a satisfactory conclusion, as well as the commitment to review this type of situation and contact both the FA and the Ministry of Finance. Planning to study possible actions in order to protect clubs from possible embezzlement by the owners of the field.

Despite all this bizarre history and having been expelled from their own home, the fans of the fight are still struggling to keep the club of their loves alive. After all the support given to the community during all these years, now they are the ones looking to receive it back, because the club is being financed by donations that fans and supporters make through the Save Dulwich Hamlet page .

This may be the story that serves as a trigger for the British Government to act and begin to protect the clubs, their social heritage and, above all, their fans of modern football governed by finances, economic benefits and short-termism. Meanwhile, the struggle of Dulwich Hamlet FC continues: an exemplary club and hopefully the example to follow for English football.

El Dulwich Hamlet FC, el ejemplo a seguir del fútbol inglés
 
Given the profile of this specifically, I'd say 2 years for a CPO from last month.

Unfortunately if we do get the stadium back in two years we'll need to factor in time for the pitch etc. to get sorted as I doubt Meadow will maintain the place. Realistically the club won't be back immediately after any compulsory purchase sadly. We are looking at at least two seasons out of Dulwich and probably at least part of a third season.
 
They can support it, but both politically and to me personally they are a TOTAL irrelevance.
Tell you what, seeing as it's us who are on fire in this situation...let's get UKIP on board as well, eh?
I hold the Greens in as much contempt as the Greens to be honest. Can't stand either of those pursuasions.

Cheers Mishi, so nice that you think we’re as bad as UKIP.
 
Cheers Mishi, so nice that you think we’re as bad as UKIP.
That is not what I said. I would say ukip at their height were far worse as they are potentially so dangerous.
The greens opposed the building of the current ground and every ground development since. I personally have no time for the greens at all.
 
Iam sure I have a few tweets from LibDem Cllr Barber talking about match day chaos and noise (and drumming) and a leaflet handed out by Simon Hughes ex MP opposing any development on the site, but honestly think we need as broad a front as possible on Southwark Council and that includes Greens, LibDems, Conservatives and labour - as for UKIP I believe are well aware of their policies which stand in total opposition to all we stand for at Dulwich Hamlet and dont and wont have any Councillors on Southwark Council anyway
 
That is not what I said. I would say ukip at their height were far worse as they are potentially so dangerous.
The greens opposed the building of the current ground and every ground development since. I personally have no time for the greens at all.

You do realise that there a few active Greens, myself included, who support the club? Personally, I didn't like the Meadow redevelopment plans at all, and am happy that the council rejected them. What happened 25 years ago I can't really comment on, as I wasn't resident on this side of the river, but I will say that the car park is a major blight on the area.
 
Iam sure I have a few tweets from LibDem Cllr Barber talking about match day chaos and noise (and drumming) and a leaflet handed out by Simon Hughes ex MP opposing any development on the site, but honestly think we need as broad a front as possible on Southwark Council and that includes Greens, LibDems, Conservatives and labour - as for UKIP I believe are well aware of their policies which stand in total opposition to all we stand for at Dulwich Hamlet and dont and wont have any Councillors on Southwark Council anyway

From memory it was a Labour council that blocked the Hambase apication on the basis it involved building on MOL.

Had the Meadow proposal the current Labour council would almost certainly have rejected it, amongst other reasons, because it involved building on MOL.

It is a Labour London Mayor who, had Southwark passed it, would have called it in and rejected it. He has an electoral mandate to do so.

The simple fact is that building on MOL is now all but impossible. Mainstream political belief is that it is unacceptable. This is not solely a Green policy in 2018.

The world has moved on. We can either stand here and howl into the wind about the good old days or we recognise the politicL realities of where the club is and work within them.

Party politics needs to be kept out of this unless the local politicians make that impossible. With pretty much cross party consensus existing we can only lose if this turns party political.

Not living in London I don't know what the local electoral cycle is but just to add if you have imminent elections the political purdah period has started which will impact what council officers can do / say in public. One to be aware of.
 
You do realise that there a few active Greens, myself included, who support the club? Personally, I didn't like the Meadow redevelopment plans at all, and am happy that the council rejected them. What happened 25 years ago I can't really comment on, as I wasn't resident on this side of the river, but I will say that the car park is a major blight on the area.
Yes, I do. Your point is? I also know of several Lib Dems, and several Conservative voters who support our club.
I support Dulwich Hamlet. I do not really care who others vote for as long as they don't break our ground regulations and rules while attending our games. Persomally speaking, I think that the wasteland known as the sportsground that was called Greendale, and before that one of the old Champion Hill grounds that ocassionally held 10,000 fans for big games in the 1920's (despite Green supporters claiming it has never been developed) is a huge eyesore, far more than a car park. Each to their own.
 
Where does Cllcr Barber stand on this isn’t CH part of his ward? He normally has a few things to say! Aren’t their local elections coming up?
 
Why ever not? A logo helps communicate a message and the fact that we no longer play in our proper ground is a fairly important message to get out, I would have thought.
Well yes, if it's for a sticker, or t-shirt...but otherwise?
 
Back
Top Bottom