Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

NASA Artemis mission

Opinion: this rocket is very impressive and will put on one hell of a show but my god is it a waste of money. The Senate Launch System, designed to funnel NASA money to the most states possible, for as long as possible. Technical performance and cost per launch (they aren't saying, but it's many billions) are not important.
 
Opinion: this rocket is very impressive and will put on one hell of a show but my god is it a waste of money. The Senate Launch System, designed to funnel NASA money to the most states possible, for as long as possible. Technical performance and cost per launch (they aren't saying, but it's many billions) are not important.
The Everyday Astronaut YT channel estimated the launch cost "sticker price" at around $4bn.
 
Is it gonna go? Not looking hopeful right now.

Just send someone out there to hit it with a hammer, that’ll get it going.
 
Unofficial suggestion is it's a scrub for today (based on messages circulated to VIP launch guests).

Launch weather just went red - Cu cloud rule violation.
 
Scrub due to the number three RS-25 core engine bleed. Next launch attempts likely to be 1748BST Friday 2 September (120 minutes), and 2212BST Monday 5 September (90 minutes). There are potential launch windows running between and beyond those dates but there are other factors that reduce the practical opportunities.
 
Last edited:

This is a well-informed article on the political and technical machinations that underlie the development of the SLS. Although it's an impressive machine, it's late, over budget, and not actually fit for purpose (as an advanced upper stage still remains to be built to allow useful lunar activities). The recurring cost of launch is huge, at $4Bn !!! per launch (that is $58k per kg to low earth orbit), according to the NASA Inspector General. NASA plans to launch every other year, a cadence that is too infrequent to support a functioning cis-lunar initiative.

It will be interesting to see what happens when SpaceX finally gets the Starship operational. Starship has a payload capacity similar to SLS, but Elon speculates about a cost of $2M per launch. Even if he optimistic by a factor of a 100, Starship will still be 20 times cheaper than SLS.
 
Last edited:

Artemis: Nasa calls off new Moon rocket launch​



Controllers struggled to get an engine on the 100m-tall vehicle cooled down to its correct operating temperature.
They had previously worried about what appeared to be a crack high up on the rocket but eventually determined it was merely frost build-up.
 
Elon may be arguably the worlds biggest twat, but he* does appear to know how to build rockets :hmm:




*the army of clever SpaceX engineers
The CEO rating for spacex on Glassdoor is 90-something%
Far above any other aerospace company.

The general opinion of spacex engineers seems to be that they love having a boss who's actually interested in their work, and who actually understands the nitty gritty. So what if he's a slavedriving workaholic, they'd happily grind themselves to a bloody stump for the cause of sending humans to mars.

If starship works out, then SLS will have to be put down. I give it two, max three flights.
 
The CEO rating for spacex on Glassdoor is 90-something%
Far above any other aerospace company.

The general opinion of spacex engineers seems to be that they love having a boss who's actually interested in their work, and who actually understands the nitty gritty. So what if he's a slavedriving workaholic, they'd happily grind themselves to a bloody stump for the cause of sending humans to mars.

If starship works out, then SLS will have to be put down. I give it two, max three flights.
I just wish he’d also do what he does for trains, rather than cars.
 
The CEO rating for spacex on Glassdoor is 90-something%
Far above any other aerospace company.

The general opinion of spacex engineers seems to be that they love having a boss who's actually interested in their work, and who actually understands the nitty gritty. So what if he's a slavedriving workaholic, they'd happily grind themselves to a bloody stump for the cause of sending humans to mars.

If starship works out, then SLS will have to be put down. I give it two, max three flights.
But there is no employee validation for leaving glassdoor reviews, so for someone with such a big fanbase as Musk, that number is meaningless.
 
But there is no employee validation for leaving glassdoor reviews, so for someone with such a big fanbase as Musk, that number is meaningless.
Hmm, didn't know that.
The anecdotal evidence does suggest that the engineers consider him a good boss though. When you see him talking about the technical details it's clear he really does get down in the weeds with them. Shame he's such a collosal bellend.
 
Hmm, didn't know that.
The anecdotal evidence does suggest that the engineers consider him a good boss though. When you see him talking about the technical details it's clear he really does get down in the weeds with them. Shame he's such a collosal bellend.
I'm not sure about that, have you seen this?
 
A new broadcast link has been posted, suggesting the intention is to aim for Friday. Current launch forecast suggests only 40% chance of no weather violations for the window that day (risk of storms in the afternoon).
 
A college pal of Mrs Q married a yank many years ago and moved to Arizona with him. Apparently they're currently on holiday in Florida and were posting pics of them waiting to watch the launch that didn't happen.
 
A college pal of Mrs Q married a yank many years ago and moved to Arizona with him. Apparently they're currently on holiday in Florida and were posting pics of them waiting to watch the launch that didn't happen.
3 times I went to see the shuttle go up.

3 times the fucking thing aborted, one at something like t minus 3 seconds, the main engines had even fired up.

Grrrrr. Never did get to see it :(
 

Whatever you think of Musk, his companies are highly aspirational for engineering students, coming 1st and 2nd in the survey above. It's true that he is obsessive, and staff work very hard; for those who leave, Tesla and SpaceX look great on their CVs., and for those who stay, they get accustomed to the pace. It's also worth considering that all that hard work actually generates tangible and exciting results, in the shape of innovative cars and spaceships.

Compare with similarly exhausting jobs, viz investment banking and management consulting: similarly hard work produces nothing of any tangible value (arguably it destroys value).

Or, if you choose an easier life at a competitor legacy manufacturer (eg Ford, GM, Toyota; or Boeing, Lockheed, Northrup), then it's more like being a civil servant: regular hours, pointless meetings, promotion through politics, strangulating bureaucracy.
 
Awaiting management briefing update. Meanwhile, this suggests [hope for] some sort of on-pad approach to resolving issues rather than a VAB rollback.
 
Next launch attempt now targeting this Saturday, 3rd September. Window opens at 1917BST (2 hours long). Forecast currently indicates 60% chance of launch weather violation.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom