Is she called Rudolph?All I could find out about the premises is that locals think it is owned by Larry's daughter
Back from skiing, are they?I've been in touch with the guys and have an update about the bar to post up shortly.
No she just hasn't bothered to register a change of ownership by the look of it. Why should she, unless she is/has sold the property?Is she called Rudolph?
Back from skiing, are they?
But Larry was Clifton, so was he also Rudolph?No she just hasn't bothered to register a change of ownership by the look of it. Why should she, unless she is/has sold the property?
You've raised an issue now Rushy. I don't have access to the Jamaican registry of births marriages and deaths - and if it's anything like the Ghanaian one you might be able to chose your preferred name and date of birth.But Larry was Clifton, so was he also Rudolph?
Its similar…. and they don't always register deaths if they take place in Jamaica. Which means that it can be difficult to track and prove ownership, as a friend found to her cost- she had a flat in Ealing, she went to sell and discovered the freeholder was dead, but wasn't recorded as dead and they couldn't trace him ever having been alive to the satisfaction of the british courts, either. And because only the freeholder can sort out some of the insurances, that lapsed too… they are three years into a court case at the momentYou've raised an issue now Rushy. I don't have access to the Jamaican registry of births marriages and deaths - and if it's anything like the Ghanaian one you might be able to chose your preferred name and date of birth.
Can't we settle for that quaint old-English term "it's family property"?
Wow. I must get round to making that will...........Its similar…. and they don't always register deaths if they take place in Jamaica. Which means that it can be difficult to track and prove ownership, as a friend found to her cost- she had a flat in Ealing, she went to sell and discovered the freeholder was dead, but wasn't recorded as dead and they couldn't trace him ever having been alive to the satisfaction of the british courts, either. And because only the freeholder can sort out some of the insurances, that lapsed too… they are three years into a court case at the moment
You must. <<stern face>>Wow. I must get round to making that will...........
Why, you're being positively... positive there, ed.I posted up an updated article with menu selection. It's opening around Easter.
http://www.brixtonbuzz.com/2014/02/...name-announces-menu-details-and-opening-date/
I like the fact that they've kept in touch with me and made an effort. I respect that.Why, you're being positively... positive there, ed.
Yeah, fair fucks. Gotta say I was surprised they are aiming for prices that "low".I like the fact that they've kept in touch with me and made an effort. I respect that.
Did they get much powder in the alps?
I thought market house was the local "speakeasy"?
9 quid cocktails?! Definitely should be illegal!
bloody hellBirthday treat in town revealed that, in places like Browns Hotel, cocktails cost £15 to £20. Terrifying.
that posh eatery called the Dairy in Clapham was doing something with breast milk IIRC, or they may have just been indulging in social media ironybloody hell
i've got some cider and some breastmilk here, might mix 'em up and make my very own modern cocktail. I'll have to give myself an £15 IOU for the pleasure though...
You aren't allowed to sell it in this country due to food safety laws and the impossibility of following the tracing etc laws.that posh eatery called the Dairy in Clapham was doing something with breast milk IIRC, or they may have just been indulging in social media irony
how do you know that ?You aren't allowed to sell it in this country due to food safety laws and the impossibility of following the tracing etc laws.
Don't ask me why I know that
But can't natural processes jump? Wasn't the temporary settlement of people from the Windrush in south London a 'forced' change?"Evolution" implies a natural process of development/re-development/social change. I'd say that over the last 10 years (arguably 15) "forced mutation" is a better description, and that given the plans of this local authority and its neighbours, the mutation will only speed up.
That's very weird!how do you know that ?
( not wishing to derail the thread but when my daughter was a baby I was pushing her down by the oval when a woman stepped in front of us and snatched the milk bottle from my daughters hands, she demanded. a five pound ransom and when it was not forthcoming she drank the lot in one and then asked for a pound for the empty)
But can't natural processes jump? Wasn't the temporary settlement of people from the Windrush in south London a 'forced' change?
Not so much forced as inevitable - South London had more empty housing and cheap rental housing. What we saw from '48-onward was much the same impulse as what made Whitechapel a nexus for immigrants for a hundred years. People first gravitated there for the cheap accommodation, and then gravitated there because it was a nexus for their own immigrant community. It all took about 25 years for Brixton to become (at least in the mind of the media) the bastion of "West Indian"-ness they believed it to be.
I like the fact that they've kept in touch with me and made an effort. I respect that.
What's the difference?