Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Making votes count against the far right

articul8

Dishonest sociopath
I posted this on the announcements forum, but since I thought (hoped!) it might generate some debate thought I'd post it here too.

Making Votes Count Against the Far Right
Sponsored by Make Votes Count and Compass

Speakers: Billy Bragg, Jon Cruddas MP (tbc), Nick Lowles (Editor, Searchlight), Mick Rix (GMB), Cllr. Patrick Vernon (Labour group, Hackney), Emily Georghiou (Chair).

Wednesday 28th March, 2007, 7.30pm
Boothroyd Room, Portcullis House, Westminster.


see http://www.makemyvotecount.org.uk
[email protected]


Voters are increasingly feeling cheated by the political system. All the major parties know that the outcome of a general election turns on a small number of swing voters in the key “middle England” marginals. Policy-making and political campaigning is almost entirely geared around to the unrepresentative few, whilst the majority of voters who live in ‘safe’ seats find they are practically ignored by the decision makers. Disillusionment with our political leaders means that local parties have become hollowed-out shells. What little contact they have with voters now comes through national call-centres or central mail-outs.

As parties rush to the over-crowded ‘centre-ground’, their core supporters are left feeling angry and disenfranchised. This sense of powerlessness and alienation creates a vacuum into which extreme and racist parties such as the BNP are able to move and pose as the voice of forgotten local communities.

To defeat the forces of the far right and combat racist hatred, we need to build a positive alternative which gives communities a real voice. Whilst they might not figure in the agendas of spin doctors and opinion pollsters, issues like social housing, job security and local services are critical to the quality of life in towns and cites across the country. We need to build a better, more democratic political culture which takes seriously the genuine anxieties of local communities without pandering to racism.

This meeting aims to open up a debate about how we might rebuild confidence in our politics by restoring and extending democracy, and in doing so, marginalize racist parties of the far right.

• How might we rebuild our political structures so that they begin to deliver for voters who now feel completely neglected?
• Can we make sure that a flawed voting system does not see racist extremists elected on a minority of the votes, because the democratic opposition is split between rival candidates?
• Is it possible to re-balance the system so that parties are rewarded for seeking the votes of every voter in every area of the country, and ensure that voters feel that their concerns are being listened to?
 
John Cruddas has an interesting diagnosis of the problems: however one of the most fundamental causes of such a dilemma as we find ourselves in is the Labour Party--and given all listed are Labour supporters (plus a Searchlight low-life), they are part of the problem, not the solution. Indeed, given Bragg's exertions in Dagenham, which saw the BNP sweep the board electorally, is he their secret (musical) weapon?
 
undoutedly New Labour has been a part of the problem. But where does New Labour spring from? There is a strong argument to say that our First-Past-The-Post voting system meant that the spin/pollster approach of winning over Daily Mail reading swing voters was what made this rightward drift a priority.

Opening up the electoral system, such that Labour is rewarded for winning more votes in working class areas (unlike now, where votes piling up in such seats are 'wasted'), would mean a space could emerge for a class-based polititcal alternative to re-emerge. Where would the pressure come from a change of system? Partly from the discontented majority left inside in today's Labour party.
 
articul8 said:
undoutedly New Labour has been a part of the problem. But where does New Labour spring from? There is a strong argument to say that our First-Past-The-Post voting system meant that the spin/pollster approach of winning over Daily Mail reading swing voters was what made this rightward drift a priority.

Opening up the electoral system, such that Labour is rewarded for winning more votes in working class areas (unlike now, where votes piling up in such seats are 'wasted'), would mean a space could emerge for a class-based polititcal alternative to re-emerge. Where would the pressure come from a change of system? Partly from the discontented majority left inside in today's Labour party.

Dream on: this is a maneouvre to keep Labour in power, judging by this line-up.
 
Interesting that, as the reason Labour resist electoral reform for local government is precisely because it would interrupt some of their one-party-state position. It's about Labour people wanting their own party to be given a kick up the backside from what I can see.
 
articul8 said:
Interesting that, as the reason Labour resist electoral reform for local government is precisely because it would interrupt some of their one-party-state position. It's about Labour people wanting their own party to be given a kick up the backside from what I can see.

On the assumption you really believe this, might I respectfully point out you are wrong? It is the way the BNP have made sweeping gains in former Labour heartlands that scares the LP shitless. Hence, under the guise of 'extending democracy' they want a rule-change to rule out the possibility of the BNP or similar winning seats.
 
One interpretation. It guess what alternative system they put forward. It could be a establishment 'fix', yes. Or a more proportional system could give them more seats, in more places, in the short term - but actually reflect what people think. OK I doubt that's what Labour bosses will have in mind. But isn't there something to be said for it in the long run?
 
Never mind the provenance/agenda of the meeting, if I was in London, i would go, just to make some points or get a platform to highlight issues about inequality, etc and how people are being left behind, ignored or even attacked( such as people on welfare) by NL.
 
articul8 said:
the panel would probably agree
And then they'd tell you why it's more important to keep the BNP out, so we'd best just vote Labour anyway (maybe not in those exact words, obviously).

Labour need the BNP, they're the boogeymen that keep leftists voting Labour.
 
Back
Top Bottom