Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
ironically, that's exactly what your hot take isA lame unoriginal idea that should have never made it out of the student common room.
ironically, that's exactly what your hot take isA lame unoriginal idea that should have never made it out of the student common room.
I'm not trying to avoid anything, but if you are going to make a film of Lord Of The Flies with girls, it needs to be about how girls might behave. I'm sure it is possible to make a film about how the girls' behaviour might be a reaction to the 'toxic masculinity' of the world they've left behind.So, yes, support a film about this. But don't try to make this sort of film out of 'Lord of the Flies which, as one person in their tweet wrote, is about "the replication of systemic masculine toxicity".
Is this central theme of the whole work the subject you are trying to avoid?
The whole point about why is is called Lord of the Flies is that the Lord of the Flies is, in standard demonology, a title of Beelzebub, half-brother of Satan. And that unfettered expression of pre-mature testosterone (the boys without teachers or other controls) is of the demonic nature of evil and death.I'm not trying to avoid anything, but if you are going to make a film of Lord Of The Flies with girls, it needs to be about how girls might behave. I'm sure it is possible to make a film about how the girls' behaviour might be a reaction to the 'toxic masculinity' of the world they've left behind.
it's ONE of the points of the story. It's such a rich story with so much to say about not just "toxic masculinity" (which damages everyone, not just boys). The book is set after an apocalyptic war meant to reflect the total societal breakdown that came with WW2 and its aftermath in Europe - so there is plenty of room for a scenario in which girls are beastly to each other too.The whole point about why is is called Lord of the Flies is that the Lord of the Flies is, in standard demonology, Beelzebub, half-brother of Satan. And that unfettered expression of pre-mature testosterone (the boys without teachers or other controls) is of the nature of evil and death.
Girls wouldn't express this and so the whole point of the story, the theme of it, is gone. So it's not the story because it's not about the Lord of the Flies.
In terms of island-based allegories, I prefer Island by Aldous Huxley (and why doesn't that get made into a fucking TV show?)
In terms books featuring the words Lord of the in the title, I rate Rings over Flies.
In terms of answering the key question, ''What would our fathers do?'', Capital by Karl Marx is way more informative.
Lord of the Flies. I hate that book, not surprised it's been made into a TV show. More pandering to misanthropy.
Only because you want it to be. But not in this book.Humanity is the beast here
I reckon most people hate it just cos it was taught at school
but i'm talking about a potential film adaptation with girls instead of boys and suggesting how the film makers might be able to do it. there's a lot of scope for examining patriarchy (which produces these polarities of masculine and feminine) by examining the behaviour of girls and how they've been socialised to be 'feminine'.Only because you want it to be. But not in this book.
cos it's an astute look at 'life and the world'Yeah, I hate the fact it gets taught to kids, too. So many books to choose from to teach kids about life and the world. Why choose that one?
note that in the end order is restored by the arrival of a british officer who chides them for poor form. The beast is back in the box. Quite telling imo.Yeah, I hate the fact it gets taught to kids, too. So many books to choose from to teach kids about life and the world. Why choose that one?
so? Lord Of The Flies is an excellent book and ought to be taught as there are valuable observations made about masculinity, human nature, civilisation and its breakdown, etc etcThere are lots of those to choose from though.
one can teach that too though, my teacher certainly didnote that in the end order is restored by the arrival of a british officer who chides them for poor form. The beast is back in the box. Quite telling imo.
I can see how it could work, but if it's written by two men, I remain sceptical.
what about what about what aboutAnd if two women wrote male characters?
what about what about what about
oh ffs
People were talking about the Ghostbusters remake and idiots got upset by the idea.I'll let you answer my question in your own time.
Don't have an issue with this and not sure how anyone else can at this stage. Feminists were fapping over a female Ghostbusters after all, and it's not like girls don't bully each other, just supposedly in a different way to boys..
We need meat,” Jackie said. “The little ’uns have had nothing but fruit for days.”
“I’m a vegetarian,” said Ralphy. “So I’m honestly fine.”
Jackie rolled her eyes. “Yeah, I think you’ve mentioned it. But the rest of us would really like to not die from protein deficiency.”
“That’s a common misconception, actually?” Ralphy offered. “There are a lot of ways to get protein without needing meat.”
“Yeah,” Simone added. “I mean, I eat meat, but I’ve read that it’s actually great for the environment and for your health to have at least one meat-free day a week. So that’s what I’m thinking of this as!”
Jackie was annoyed but stopped herself from saying something rude. Hadn’t she just been talking with her therapist about how she always sabotaged new relationships?
“O.K.,” she nodded. “You’re right.”
Back home, she started a blog about what she had learned from her weeks going vegan. Her friends all secretly agreed that it was insufferable, but also that at least she hadn’t murdered any of them, or started worshipping a pig god.
So basically like most literature until fairly recent times, still probably in predominance...It was specifically written about boys. Golding was exploring wider issues about masculinity.
People were talking about the Ghostbusters remake and idiots got upset by the idea.