I like that the pysicists thought about whether the LHC could create mini black holes which could eat the planet and decided after much research that they probably could not.
. probably .
Not exactly the degree of certainty I would prefer really.
Explain this in terms a fan of sci-fi might understand plaese
</H2>
This confuses me
Just been looking at that link and noticed that they've re-organised the UK research councils again...You sure? RAL have been contributing to the LHC project, even though the experiments are done at CERN
http://www.scitech.ac.uk/SciProg/PP/Projects/LHC.aspx
*desperately wants ChrisFilter Snr to be a top scientist at RAL so he can come on here and explain the wonders of the universe to us *
Dotcommunist - the clever thing about the polywell fusion method is that you don't need massive temperatures or pressures. By setting up a gradient of electric charge throughtout the chamber, ions of what ever you want to fuse whizz back and forth at very high speeds (like ball bearings running back and forth in a big bowl). When two particles collide in the center, they're going fast enough to fuse and release energy. The clever bit is the arrangement of the magnets, which 'herd' a cloud of electrons onto the particular shape that produces a high enough gradient. This magnetic field also prevents the flying ions from colliding with the magnets. The magnetic field also channels the high-energy products of the fusion reaction out along several axes. That energy can either be used to heat a fluid which drives turbines like a regular power station, or (if we can build it) converted directly into electricity with solid-state (ie. no moving parts) electrodes. Even more excitingly, you could use the energy to directly heat a propellant, and create a rocket engine powerful enough to take off from earth, and fly to mars and back under continuous power.
This method of fusion has been done before - it's called a hersh-farnsworth fusor. That design uses 2 spherical grids, oppositely charged, to create the electric gradient. However, most of the whizzing ions collide with the mesh of the grids, preventing most fusions. These devices require much more energy than they produce. By removing the grids, and allowing the ions to circulate freely, the Bussard polywell should allow fusion with an energy product greater than that required to power the magnets.
Wikipedia has a pretty good page, with pictures of the prototype machines (which are housed in a spherical vacuum shell when running)
manned flight to mars by 2030 ftmfw
This method of fusion has been done before - it's called a hersh-farnsworth fusor. That design uses 2 spherical grids, oppositely charged, to create the electric gradient. However, most of the whizzing ions collide with the mesh of the grids, preventing most fusions. These devices require much more energy than they produce. By removing the grids, and allowing the ions to circulate freely, the Bussard polywell should allow fusion with an energy product greater than that required to power the magnets.
me me me me me!!
me me me me me!!
This is what I like to hear
manned flight to mars by 2030 ftmfw
More earth bound. I can imagine things like giant fusion powered desalination plants.
we should be using both. All forms of renewables should be used - they all have a contribution to make.
I was pretty lucky to visit this very collider in dec 2005. Its massive. heres a pic
Wind turbines are an absolute waste of resources.
Look at the production costs, limited life, variable output and the fact that if the grid wasn't forced by law to take their output at a premium price, they wouldn't sell a watt of electricity.
Got some figures for that?
You can arrange a free tour of CERN provided you can get there. just go to their website (CERN). You have to book about 6 months in advance. I have a booking in place for the end of March but nobody i know is geeky enough to go with me
I still don't really understand what it does but it is too cool not to see.
It's thrown up a court case now http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=2688
Is there any possibility they may have a point?
What was the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory has two accelerators; ISIS (http://www.isis.rl.ac.uk/) and Diamond Light Source (www.diamond.ac.uk). ISIS is a low power accelerator that uses protons (hydrogen ions) to generate neutons when they are fired into a target. It has just been extends with the construction of Target Station Two. DLS is a synchrotron, a 3GeV electron accelerator used to generae high intensity beams of light from far IR to X-ray.Haha, I wouldn't have a clue. I googled Hardron Collider and abingdon and a lot of stuff comes up. I'm sure he said something like that.
No correction needed
Although I have my hopes on Inertial Electrodynamic Fusion myself - the Bussard Polywell. They're building and testing a new prototype right now.