Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
but what do you think?could be rubbish.
but what do you think?could be rubbish.
The picture is of "The Bullingdon Club" an Oxbridge dining club for rich students, David Cameron and Boris Johnston are in that photo. Google Search "The Bullingdon Club" to see the original.Please can someone explain that picture now because it's annoying me not knowing.
jizzageIt doesn't look like Corbyn is having one last major mass rally in London before the vote, not wanting to show hubris, etc?
Some one just posted we may be in the new 'Jezz Age'!
A confession: I didn’t originally want a ‘left’ candidate in the Labour leadership election. My view was that, in the midst of general post-election demoralisation, a left candidate could end up being crushed. Such a result would be used by both the Labour party establishment and the British right generally to perform the last rites of the left, dismiss us as irrelevant, and tell us to shut up forever. I originally toyed with starting a campaign to enlist Lisa Nandy, the straight-talking ‘soft left’ Wigan MP, but she had just given birth, so that wasn’t going to happen. [https://twitter.com/OwenJones84/status/600625839231893505] The Shadow Cabinet minister Jon Trickett was originally approached by several people asking him to stand: for the reasons above, I suggested it was bad idea. Instead we began brainstorming a ‘Not The Labour Leadership’ tour alongside a presumably dispiriting leadership contest with three candidates dancing on the head of a pin, with the aim of helping to rebuild a grassroots movement.
https://medium.com/@OwenJones84/my-...-overcoming-formidable-obstacles-de81d4449884
Popular appeal cannot be won by simply focusing on issues that affect those at the bottom of society. Yes, we desperately need policies that transform the lives of the one in five workers who earn less than a living wage; people who lack an affordable home; disabled people having their benefits cut away; those suffering from the bedroom tax; and so on. And yes, one of the main aims of a Corbyn-led campaign will be to mobilise, inspire, political engage poorer people who are significantly less likely to vote. But empathy for the worst affected alone will never win an election. Jeremy has begun outlining policies to support self-employed people and entrepreneurs, as well as expanding home ownership without flogging off social housing. This has to be built on, with a direct appeal to both middle-income and middle-class people that goes beyond being asked to empathise for the poorest people in society.
no its just a very old labour tendency-christ a trot tendency as well- to admit that the petite bourgoise must be won to the cause as well because in theory the prole dem lack the muscle to take power directly and then weather the opprobrium and outright resistance from an angry and resentful lower middle class.Mmm, he may be right but seeing it in print, this is what the other candidates are saying, is Owen sniffing power?
the global corporate asset strippers? there was me thinking they were a uk political party and not e.g. kpmg, pwcOne thing Corbyn could do on identity, patriotism, is reframe the debate so the Tories can be identified as the global corporate asset strippers, with no real concern for this country.
Popular appeal cannot be won by simply focusing on issues that affect those at the bottom of society. Yes, we desperately need policies that transform the lives of the one in five workers who earn less than a living wage;
The scrabbling fuck wit. Makes Osborne' Faslane statement yesterday look like tactical genius. Amazing how far and fast Johnson's star has fallen (til you look at the man)Despite Corbyn having absolutely fuck all to do with it, Boris Johnson is blaming him for London Underground's failure to introduce the night tube on time Boris Johnson blames failure to bring in night Tube on Jeremy Corbyn
Been away from the interwebz for a while now but if you genuinely think that David Miliband would have been less effective than his ridiculously hapless brother and then, beyond that, think that Corbyn could do better and actually win, then you are a prize moron marked by stunning stupidity.
why though? do you think he couldn't actually win? I don't see why not. The man has proved capable hands for a very long time, this isn't some newly minted firebrand (lol) nor is he advocating anything incredibly radical. Its a mark of how well you swallowed all the right wing rhetoric that you've called him hard left in the past, he is not hard left in any way at all. Stop reading papers and start listening to people. Cos there is a lot of them nodding along thoughtfully to corbynite ideas (which aren't his but merely a continuation of old labs keynsian stuff)
tbf he probably has a point about the Millibands. The other brother may well have done better.Rather than ranting, why not make your case? Isn't that what lawyers are supposed to be good at?
Ever get the feeling that Diamond had plans to go the new Labour/Progress route to a political career?
...Does Diamond thinkEd was left-winginsomeany vaguely coherent way?
tbf he probably has a point about the Millibands. The other brother may well have done better.
However, it's odd to link that to Corbyn. Does Diamond think Ed was left-wing in some way?
Based on...? The only difference between the two is that (partly due to starting to climb the greasy pole earlier) Miliband. D was Foreign Secretary (and a singularly-undistinguished one),whereas Miliband. E was "Energy & Climate Change" Minister. Performance-wise, there was barely a fag paper between them.
and its only a few weeks ago that people on this thread thought Corbyn didn't didn't have any hope at all. How things change.Looks like it's a JC win with Burnham coming second going by the bookies and polls.