Crispy said:
Well we'd like to help you, but in terms of presentation, you're not doing well. So much so, that it's so hard to tease the actual meaning out that we can't give you meaningful criticisms/help.
...and then as to the meaning of by blog hypothesis, wel there was a guy who contrute to the philophy section of u75 forum who called himself nosos, and who seemed to figure it ou pretty well.
But here, for what it's worth is a summary of the blog argument.
So for a start, unike the standard model of quantum and particle physics that just recogizes the action of the push or pull causes called the forces, my account is the outline, anyway, of an sufficient general explanation of how matter in general exists as observed.
That is, how matter as atoms, molecules and living organisms can persist in their various and particular forms and given that, in the 3D space experienced, you can consider that the world is made just of its smallest parts and the forces that surround such subatomic compoments of matter.
And also how matter can exist given that it consists almost all of the space between its universal components as electrons and atomic nuclei that are measured to be around a billionth of of its volume and this despite the powerful forces acting within and upon matter.
So that basically one can conclude that a universe that everywhere consists just of particles and the push or pull or attract or repel forces and yet is composed of all its various forms of matter as the elements and compounds of inanimate matter and the species of living organisms just doesn't make sense.
And also doesn't make sense however the standard model of quantum theory and partical physics may, by measurement, calculation and mathematical formulae, describe the subatomic particles and their behaviour and the forces that act between them.
So that, with just a knowledge of the action of the forces, Richard Feynman could reasonably insist of the quantum mechanical description of the behaviour of quantum objects - as the photons of radiant energy and the subatomic components of matter - that "nobody knows how it can be like that".
And yet one can ask how and where in the world can there be anything more than these objects that are detected as particles and the forces that act between the particles of matter?
While my blog argues that although
no clear and sufficiently justified answer can possibly be found to this question from any kind of experimental evidence of inanimate matter or the energy it radiates
by itself, it is possible to find an answer when considering certain evidence of living organisms
as well.
So that, in short, enough details could be found, described or represented and sufficiently justified of a cause that acts universally in addition to the forces only by deducing,
(1) hypthetically, that and, in enough clear detail, how, in particular, quantum wave and entanglement behaviour could be the effects of a cause that acts unlike any force and then
(2) how, in the light of such a causal quantum hypothesis and certain problems of mind, how the mind or subject of experience as a distinct and immaterial entity could relate to the body so as to produce consiousness.
And so that this cause could neither be described as pushing or pulling objects so as to produce its effects nor as acting in fields that surround objects nor as acting at a distance with any measurable strength.
But rather this cause could be considered to act universally so as to
maintain or conserve the form and organisation of matter as atoms, molecule and living oranisms and despite the action of all the forces.
And then by acting invariably at any distance between objects and with no strength that reduces or ceases with distance this cause can't be described as surrounding objects in 3D space. So that such a cause could only be diagrammatically represented or pictured as acting upon matter and radiant energy
from additional dimensions of space to the three in the world experienced. And only thus can one think of this cause as being unaffected by the action of all the forces.
While I've shown how this extradimensional action of such a cause resolves the problem of how there can be many immaterial minds each with unique points of view on the world and how the individual's consciousness can be regarded as necessarily indivisible.
In the blog account it can be also found how the form conserving property of the cause can be related to certain general feature of the behaviour of living organisms including human beings.
And although not on my blog, I have had thoughts that a quite detailed theory could be developed of the evolution of consciousness in living organisms.
Why?
