So your spur of the moment conclusions, based on partial information and with no regard whatsoever for any explanation or facts that might be unknown to you, and no doubt driven by your own prejudices are
absolutely, totally and definitively a statement that something was unlawful ... what the
fuck makes you so fucking arrogant that you are able to mysteriously discern the fucking absolute truth ...
Could you quit the aggressive and abusive tone please. I've afforded you the courtesy of not calling you names or personalising my posts, I'd be grateful if you could control yourself sufficiently to do the same.
I haven't suggested that I am able to discern the absolute truth, in the absence of other information/evidence. You're putting words into my mouth, and I'd rather you didn't. I am, however, suggesting that the police, as individuals, and as an organisation, have a strong culture of
loyalty, and will do what they can to protect themselves, individually and collectively. I also believe that the police, as a powerful tool of the state, are protected in a way that ordinary members of the public aren't. I believe this is particularly true in situations such as demonstrations where the police are protected by the state in a variety of ways.
detective_boy said:
If there is nothing for them to find there is no problem ... if, as you imply, there is then tough - play big boys games and you'll get hurt ...
So the police are the big boys eh?
So, are you saying I should expect, and accept, that if I have the temerity to complain about being assaulted at a demo, the fact I was there, is enough to warrant subsequent police attention into other areas of my life?
And you suggest it is me that is arrogant?
LOL