DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
doing bidenomics with no money is one line I've seen on this. So bullshit basically. Voodoo.
Likewise, anyone who has stood on a picket line or tried to talk to fellow workers about unions has to deal with awkward questions. Most do a lot better than those fools.I’ve done door knocking for campaigns before. The one thing that I’ve always 100% anticipated is that the homeowner might not be pleased to see me. I always took the view that I was imposing myself on somebody’s personal space and should accept that fact with humility.
When I was flying over to the UK last week I sat next to a chap who turned out to be an ex-Tory Councillor from Preston. His opinion was that neither the Tories or Labour had any ambition for the country whatsoever and that whilst they kept harking back to the past they would have been out of their depth in managing the economy and essential services in the past they keep referencing. Absolutely no ambition he kept saying and it's a phrase I kept repeating in the UK for my stay.
When I was flying over to the UK last week I sat next to a chap who turned out to be an ex-Tory Councillor from Preston. His opinion was that neither the Tories or Labour had any ambition for the country whatsoever and that whilst they kept harking back to the past they would have been out of their depth in managing the economy and essential services in the past they keep referencing. Absolutely no ambition he kept saying and it's a phrase I kept repeating in the UK for my stay.
I'll ask for an upgrade on passengers sitting next to me on Ryanair next time I use them. I suppose off the top of my head , mixing things we had and took for granted and things we might need, quite extravagant and frivolous issues like building more houses both public and private , regulation of rents, and mixing things we had and things we might need developing a skilled and rewarded workforce , expanding employment opportunities, an NHS that still had NHS dentistry, opticians, home visits by doctors, and regulation of utility industries so that we don't have shit in rivers and peoples gardens, an industrial and economic plan, perhaps even a green deal underpinning economic expansion?What would “ambition for the country” look like? I can’t see how that goes further than a slogan. It’s certainly not a policy or a goal.
I'll ask for an upgrade on passengers sitting next to me on Ryanair next time I use them. I suppose off the top of my head , mixing things we had and took for granted and things we might need, quite extravagant and frivolous issues like building more houses both public and private , regulation of rents, and mixing things we had and things we might need developing a skilled and rewarded workforce , expanding employment opportunities, an NHS that still had NHS dentistry, opticians, home visits by doctors, and regulation of utility industries so that we don't have shit in rivers and peoples gardens, an industrial and economic plan, perhaps even a green deal underpinning economic expansion?
Didn't you start a thread on what practical steps Starmer could take to move to a Republic?
Those all sound like good goals. I still choose to believe that Labour shares them but is still traumatised enough by 1992 to be terrified of anything that might lead to “tax bombshell” posters. I just don’t relate any of them to a nebulous concept like “ambition for the country”.
It’s always best to pay Ryanair the £5 extra not to be seated next to former Tory councillors.
I'd pay £20 not to sit next to someone who believed in labour and wanted to shareI think it was Mulder in the X-Files who also wanted to believe. I would probably pay a fiver not to sit next to anyone and a £10 not to sit next to someone who believed in Labour tbh
What does "wide ranging supply side reform" mean? Getting stuff cheaper?"...wide ranging supply side reform..." sounds remarkably similar to the Truss/Kwarteng line in their disastrous budget.
View attachment 416467
What does "wide ranging supply side reform" mean? Getting stuff cheaper?
jesus mary and josephHave they just said they are going to mimic Thatcher? Hahaha.
sadly the common market isn't on offerThe most immediately obvious supply-side reform would be to rejoin the common market. Free trade is classic supply side economics.
Have they just said they are going to mimic Thatcher? Hahaha.
doing bidenomics with no money is one line I've seen on this. So bullshit basically. Voodoo.
corporate tax cuts, deregulation, and low capital borrowing ratesWhat does "wide ranging supply side reform" mean? Getting stuff cheaper?
It’s nebulous business speak for people who think the economy is modelled on the Apprentice . Not for the likes of you and me or anyone else not invited to the debate . You’ve got to believe though .What does "wide ranging supply side reform" mean? Getting stuff cheaper?
Hahaha, the shift leftward when they get into power is going to be something to behold.I expect the success of her economic growth plan will allow for Labour to enact redistributive policies
yeh they'll just be on the right then, not the radical right. fucking bunch of pox-ridden posers.Hahaha, the shift leftward when they get into power is going to be something to behold.
yeh they're the party of work not the party of workers.Supply-side includes removing the rights and protections afforded to workers. A great look for the party of labour.
Exactly, and just look at the context of the delivery of that 'lecture'. This is the pawn cocktail offensive on steroids.Supply-side includes removing the rights and protections afforded to workers. A great look for the party of labour.
pawn shops will enjoy a a renaissance under shammerExactly, and just look at the context of the delivery of that 'lecture'. This is the pawn cocktail offensive on steroids.
jesus mary and joseph
yeh anyone who gives the matter any consideration is repulsed by shammer and his nefandous crewWould be turned away