My (Autistic) DiL has just been told of her 2 year PIP assessment (to see if she's 'recovered'?) and has been given an unrequested home visit assessment. Anyone got any experience/tips?
Ta
Very useful tips; thanks.dunno if this helps but might be worth making the point that such an assessment would be distressing for your DiL (if this is the case)
also, you can (as I understand) record the assessment and have it used in case of any dispute - but you have to use a dual tape recorder (ie it records two identical versions)
Does she have any sort of care team/professionals?
I can ask around my contacts for info/advice of that would help.
solidarity to you and your daughter in law
Very useful tips; thanks.
The distress issue is an interesting and nuanced factor.
1. She's already gone 6 weeks without £ and is understandably v. anxious not to see any further additional delay.
2. A component of her award recognises her anxiety issues and it is therefore (although unpleasant) not wholly disadvantageous to present in a state of heightened anxiety
3. Eldest son is approaching MPs office to see if they have a dual recorder for lending out
We were just wondering whether or not an unrequested home assessment was indicative of any 'investigatory' motive on the part of the contractors or if it merely reflected a random or back-log induced strategy on their part to progress claims?
That's very helpful and reassuring, thanks for the reply.Answer to the last bit is no brogdale , they now and then decide to do a home visit with no apparent reason. I had one a couple of years ago without requesting it and around the same time I knew of people who needed them a lot more than I did being refused without providing medical certificates etc.
Normal rules apply though with them as they will interpret any comfort, leisure activities your daughter has of proof that she has no problems whatsoever.
As for recorders I've never used one but I always have someone sitting with me taking notes. On the aforementioned home visit the woman got pretty annoyed about this and asked why are you doing this when you will see a copy of my report, to which we both replied because we dont trust you.
That's very helpful and reassuring, thanks for the reply.
It certainly ties in with what I've heard after phoning a Brighton based advocacy charity this am. The only thing they added to what you say is that it may be the case that something within the medical report has triggered the home visit approach.
The comfort and leisure point is well taken, and we're working on how we might adjust her room/circs accordingly.
btw, in your experience, was there any suggestion from the assessor that they wanted to see other parts of the house that were not invited into?
I like & admire your direct response to the assessors annoyed reaction to recording.
Gonna see if the local MP has one of the dual recorders.
Thanks again for the advice.
That's very clear & helpful; thanks again.No request to see the rest of the house but I stayed in bed anyway and refused to get up to do the "physical" tests as they already had enough evidence from real professionals on what I could and could not do.
I suppose if there was good cause ie bathroom adaptations they could reasonably ask to see them but any rooms not relevant to the claim/claimant would certainly be a no.
So sorry and angry to hear that.I'll never forgive them for refusing my Mothers claim on the grounds that she made them a cup of tea. The guy sat there and let her do it before letting the DWP know that despite being terminally ill with cancer everything was fine. She died a day before a successful appeal notification arrived.
The trick seems to be...Answer to the last bit is no brogdale , they now and then decide to do a home visit with no apparent reason. I had one a couple of years ago without requesting it and around the same time I knew of people who needed them a lot more than I did being refused without providing medical certificates etc.
Normal rules apply though with them as they will interpret any comfort, leisure activities your daughter has of proof that she has no problems whatsoever.
As for recorders I've never used one but I always have someone sitting with me taking notes. On the aforementioned home visit the woman got pretty annoyed about this and asked why are you doing this when you will see a copy of my report, to which we both replied because we dont trust you.
More really useful advice; thanks for that.The trick seems to be...
There seems to be some evidence to suggest that having a note-taker tends to help the assessor be a bit more cautious about how they behave.
- Have someone with you assiduously "taking notes".
- Have a phone in your pocket recording the assessment.
- Transcribe the essentials from the recording to provide a complete set of contemporaneous "notes", which are then admissible in a way the recording would not be.
Thanks for that.If none of you can be there, call them up and say it has to be rearranged. They have no legal right of entry so it’s not like they can barge the door down.
Thanks for that.
As ever the decision making is so fucking asymmetric...she really needs the assessment to happen...now 6 weeks & counting without £ after last (24 month) award ended.
My mate Max, for whom this thread was all about, has passed.
He was grand.
- on the use of covert recordings, provided a transcript of the highlighted portion is supplied, with the portion to be used, the recording can be used. Case law has stated that although the manner of the recording may be distasteful, it may be the only way to gain certain evidence. Just don't send in 40 hours of recordings and expect the tribunal to listen to them.
Couldn't agree more. A place I worked at before used the same company for occupational health reports, and you could say any old shit and they'd immediately believe you and put it in the report. They never asked for medical evidence from the GP (probably because it cost money). The difference between my experience of them and people going through benefits assessments is too stark to explain other than they have these targets to reject a proportion of claims.Some assessors come across as a friend. They aren't. They have targets of how many people they have to reject a week.
That's what we did.Sorry to bump this thread as couldn’t find the mega one. Someone I am supporting has their PiP assessment over the phone tomorrow. They want to record it, haven’t to my knowledge requested recording already. If they record it, I assume it’s better to not say anything and accept they can only use the recording for their own benefit, as if they tell them they are recording, likelihood is appointment will be stopped? They’ve waited months for this appointment so won’t want to delay it.
And the recording could also form the basis for "contemperaneous notes" which are, AFAIK, perfectly admissible at appeal.Sorry to bump this thread as couldn’t find the mega one. Someone I am supporting has their PiP assessment over the phone tomorrow. They want to record it, haven’t to my knowledge requested recording already. If they record it, I assume it’s better to not say anything and accept they can only use the recording for their own benefit, as if they tell them they are recording, likelihood is appointment will be stopped? They’ve waited months for this appointment so won’t want to delay it.