moral arbiters = complaining about racism.I have no idea of Diamonds latest transgression and can't be bother to read the thread in it's entirety.
It is ALWAYS the same moral arbiters turning up on every thread picking apart the slightest points\terminology and that does makes me laugh....cue the outraged.
*Read a bit more and this seems to be about Diamond accusing others of racism in a snidey way, but it then swiftly turned into a group kicking with the glee of the righteous....It has all the makings of a classic
moral arbiters = complaining about racism.
Accept that ranting and hectoring won't make any difference and do something else? Crazy thought, I realise.people have tried the arguments and asking you numerous reasonable questions so what's left?
Can you not use disablist language like lame as well please? It's offensive to those with physical disabilities.lol....I thought he was complaining about inadvertent racism...that was a joke but still to accuse me of being a racist apologist says it all....that's lame!
I have no idea of Diamonds latest transgression and can't be bother to read the thread in it's entirety.
Can you not use disablist language like lame as well please? It's offensive to those with physical disabilities.
Get in the queue behind eq and andysaus to register your disapproval pls...'I haven't read the thread but I'll make my judgements regardless'
no dissaproval, I just find it proper funny when people do that 'not read the thread but here's my 2p' thing. A weighty coin of wisdom there.Get in the queue behind eq and andysaus to register your disapproval pls...
Actually I was pointing out that Diamond had tried to accuse others of being racist but you read into my posts what suits you.Get in the queue behind eq and andysaus to register your disapproval pls...
no dissaproval, I just find it proper funny when people do that 'not read the thread but here's my 2p' thing. A weighty coin of wisdom there.
Actually I was pointing out that Diamond had tried to accuse others of being racist but you read into my posts what suits you.
Nowhere have I called you a racist apologist so cut that shit out.
Actually I was pointing out that Diamond had tried to accuse others of being racist but you read into my posts what suits you.
Nowhere have I called you a racist apologist so cut that shit out.
no dissaproval, I just find it proper funny when people do that 'not read the thread but here's my 2p' thing. A weighty coin of wisdom there.
Actually I was pointing out that Diamond had tried to accuse others of being racist but you read into my posts what suits you.
Nowhere have I called you a racist apologist so cut that shit out.
Yes you have:Actually, let's make that bigger:
I have not accused anyone of being racist on this thread
Article 2 was an Independent report on Article 1 that paraphrased Punter 3's words - who is the the foreign man from Hong Kong remember - of "hopefully the rental and selling price will go up quite a bit" as:
It doesn't really matter whether you want to call it racism or xenophobia but it appears that Mr Chiu makes quite a convenient "bogeyman" for both you and the factually dodgy Independent hacks.
And, I think it is rather bizarre that we're focusing on Mr Chiu in our discussion when there were numerous other applicants quoted in the original article - is it maybe because he is foreign and what does that imply?
It rather whiffs of "British homes for British people", which would be a rather UKIP oriented notion.
Yes you have:
For the clarity of anyone who joined the thread late and obviously can't be arsed trawling through 34 pages of tedious nonsense Mr Chiu was the only one of the three interviewees who self identified as a BTL landlord and this is why discussion had focussed on him. The three posts above are a sample of Diamond 's attempt to use this to smear other posters as racist.
I've bookmarked this post so can easily refer back to it and don't have to drag them out again.
The problem is that your argument simply does not work.
The evidence that you have accumulated does not support your accusation.
It's quite straightforward.
The problem is that your argument simply does not work.
The evidence that you have accumulated does not support your accusation.
It's quite straightforward.
I get offended by the word lame as I do have a physical disability.No you just accused me
No you didn't directly...that being the sneaky fuck you are...you just equated what I said with the above so I decided to reciprocate and no I don't give a fuck about LAME as a perogitive suddenly (it's way down on my list to get offended about) so you can shove that up your arse as well.
Pls provide me with a list of non offensive, offensive words for you and I'll be sure to include them in every future post I direct your way
I don't think I've commented on this question, though I've been following the thread as it progresses.
When the subject at hand is an accusation of dodgy conduct by you, you don't get to decide whether the arguments others are making do or don't work, you don't get to decide if the evidence presented does or does not not support the accusation.
The vast majority of those who have expressed an opinion however are content that the evidence is sufficient and the accusation is proven. The best thing for you to do, IMO, would be for you to admit your guilt and throw yourself on the mercy of the court.
Can you not insinuate people are racist apologists as I find that more offensive than the usage of the word lame....
So I have no rights of defence in the face of allegations made against me?
Rights? The only "rights" any of us have on Urban are those that the editor gives us. As many posters will be keen to inform you, this place is NOT a democracy, it's a Hobbesean nightmare.
Actually, let's make that bigger:
I have not accused anyone of being racist on this thread
Hilarious.