flyingcolumn
Active Member
How's that money-grabbing? If you don't want it - don't fuckin buy it. I know my book shelf will survive without it.
Do you know what money-grabbing means?
How's that money-grabbing? If you don't want it - don't fuckin buy it. I know my book shelf will survive without it.
do you?
If it does not sell, it does not create a profit. Therefore there is no money to grab. In fact I would have thought this particular tome was unlikely to ever produce a profit.
I cannot fathom it's (political?) purpose exactly, but would be fairly confident that 'making money' was not the reason for it's existence.
But the idea of the book of tweets it to grab money. Why else would a book of tweets be produced other than to make money?
Maybe Gerry can buy a fourth house.
Money-grabbing
There's an excellent piece in the new LRB on 'soldier dolls' and rape etc - it's subscriber only i could paste it here but it's take up 3 or 4 posts i think. I will if there's any interest.Might as well go here, I guess - SWP-style IRA investigation of rape allegations:
A woman who says she was subjected against her will to an in-house investigation by the republican movement in West Belfast after being raped by an IRA volunteer will speak out this week on a BBC documentary.
The woman, who will waive her right to anonymity during the programme, claims that she was raped and sexually assaulted by the senior IRA member when she was only 16, and that the abuse continued for a prolonged period.
When her allegations became known, the young woman was taken to a house in the city, where a special IRA team interrogated her at length.
She was also forced to confront her alleged abuser on a separate occasion, in order, the IRA said, for them to decide which of the pair was telling the truth.
She was forbidden throughout to go to the police or to rape crisis counsellors for help, and describes her fear and confusion as she was put through the ordeal, both by her alleged attacker and by IRA and Sinn Fein members who were assigned to deal with it. She had only recently left school, the interrogations lasted for hours at a time and the investigation itself went on for months.
The man was later moved out of the city. He denies the allegations and was subsequently acquitted when, in a dramatic development, no evidence was offered at his trial [...]
Alleged rape victim to tell BBC show of IRA attacker - Independent.ie
Here we go then ( btw, eagle eyed readers may be able to cross ref the use of 'groundsheets' below with the posts of a prolific poster on this thread):Butchers, I think it would interest everyone tbh.
while a crass and stupid tweet, and something he will likely come to very much regret, i think ga might have been trying to get at something which isn't unheard of:
View attachment 86457
View attachment 86456
a long, winding and not always well-made roadYes but he claims he's referring to Ballymurphy over 100 years later . Which while not the best of places certainly wasn't the deep south of the mid 19th century or even approaching it .
And given the beards pathological ego and ability to nurse a slight to an unimaginable degree , I find it a bit of a remarkable coincidence he tweets this repulsive term barely 6 weeks after a Black US president humiliated him on the international stage by denying him access to the white house on St Patricks day . After white house security staff laughably claimed they didn't know who Gerry Adams was and kept him standing at the gate for hours . An incident which led to Adams huffily snorting about " the back of the bus " . And just weeks later he's tweeting about a " n-----r".
Gerry Adams expresses anger after being denied entry to White House
Yet another remarkable coincidence in the GA saga .
i'm not saying he did or didn't let this slight go: i don't know. i'm saying the saga of ga goes along a long, winding and not always well-made road: he's not always in control of things and when he's not then he's uncomfortable.Just 6 weeks later he uses that term in public for the first time ever .
Your probably right, Adams just let the slight go . As he's well known to do .After all he couldnt report Michelle Obama to the social even if he wanted to .
i'm not saying he did or didn't let this slight go: i don't know. i'm saying the saga of ga goes along a long, winding and not always well-made road: he's not always in control of things and when he's not then he's uncomfortable.
OK. Explain to me how this book will make money? How many copies will he/they need to sell?
Most books don't make money. This one won't either.
I can think of many things to say about this, somewhat bizarre, tome. But I'll bet it doesn't make money. Who the fuck will buy it for a start.
Dp you genuinely think Adams is motivated by money? Really? On what evidence do you base that claim?
while a crass and stupid tweet, and something he will likely come to very much regret, i think ga might have been trying to get at something which isn't unheard of:
View attachment 86457
View attachment 86456
e2a: by no means apologising for ga but suggesting what might have gone through his mind.
Some spook is claiming the mind bending drugs were a complete success *
Intelligence claim credit for the "enemies" mistakes when ever possible
If it does not sell, it does not create a profit. Therefore there is no money to grab. In fact I would have thought this particular tome was unlikely to ever produce a profit.
I cannot fathom it's (political?) purpose exactly, but would be fairly confident that 'making money' was not the reason for it's existence.